Kassem Mohammad W, Chern Joshua, Loukas Marios, Tubbs R Shane
Seattle Science Foundation, 550 17th Avenue, Suite 600, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA.
Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, True Blue, Grenada.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Dec;33(12):2095-2098. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3575-y. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Intraosseous (IO) vascular access has been used since the Second World War and is warranted when there is an emergency and/or urgent need to replenish the vascular pool. Despite long-term and satisfactory results from delivering large quantities of intravenous fluid via the medullary space of bone, use of this space for a distant receptacle for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion has seldom been considered.
The current paper reviews the literature regarding the bony medullary space as a receptacle for intravenous fluid and CSF.
Previous authors have demonstrated the potential of the diploic space of the calvaria for CSF shunting. Pugh and colleagues tested the ability of the cranium to receive and absorb a small amount of tracer fluid.
The literature suggests that intraosseous placement of ventricular diversionary shunts is an alternative to more traditional sites such as the pleural cavity and peritoneum. When these latter locations are not available or are contraindicated, placement in the medullary space of bone is another option available to the surgeon.
自第二次世界大战以来,骨内(IO)血管通路就已被使用,当出现紧急和/或迫切需要补充血容量的情况时,它是必要的。尽管通过骨髓腔输送大量静脉输液取得了长期且令人满意的效果,但很少有人考虑将这个空间用作脑脊液(CSF)分流的远处容器。
本文回顾了有关将骨髓腔用作静脉输液和脑脊液容器的文献。
先前的作者已证明颅骨板障间隙用于脑脊液分流的潜力。普格及其同事测试了颅骨接收和吸收少量示踪液的能力。
文献表明,脑室分流管的骨内放置是胸膜腔和腹膜等更传统部位的替代方法。当这些后者的部位不可用或存在禁忌时,在骨髓腔放置是外科医生可用的另一种选择。