Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK; Human Anatomy Resource Centre, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Neurochirurgie. 2022 Dec;68(6):e84-e96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
In the history of hydrocephalus treatment, a variety of diversion sites have been explored to ensure an adequate alternative when the peritoneum was not a feasible option. An interesting choice was the elimination of excessive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the skeletal system. The purpose of this review was to evaluate all shunting systems that have been implemented in bone structures and to determine their therapeutic potential. All articles pertaining to bone derivations were selected from PubMed, Medline, EBSCO and Scopus, using relevant search terms. The search revealed 6 types of osseous shunts that have been used throughout history: vertebral, diploic, ventriculomastoid, ventriculoiliac, ventriculosternal and ventriculohumeral. Some of them are purely of historical significance, but data from more recent clinical and experimental studies have rendered this type of receptacle a potential site for diverting CSF. Having knowledge of all the alternatives used in cases of refractory hydrocephalus is vital for choosing the appropriate surgical intervention.
在脑积水治疗的历史中,人们探索了各种分流部位,以确保在腹膜不可行时,有足够的替代方案。一个有趣的选择是消除骨骼系统中过多的脑脊液(CSF)。本综述的目的是评估所有已在骨骼结构中实施的分流系统,并确定其治疗潜力。使用相关的搜索词,从 PubMed、Medline、EBSCO 和 Scopus 中选择了所有与骨衍生相关的文章。搜索结果显示,历史上曾使用过 6 种类型的骨质分流器:椎骨、板障、脑室-乳突、脑室-髂骨、脑室-胸骨和脑室-肱骨。其中一些仅具有历史意义,但来自最近的临床和实验研究的数据使这种类型的容器成为分流 CSF 的潜在部位。了解难治性脑积水病例中使用的所有替代方案对于选择合适的手术干预至关重要。