The vascularization pattern of acellular nerve allografts after nerve repair in Sprague-Dawley rats.

OBJECTIVE

We have demonstrated that angiogenesis in acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) can promote neuroregeneration. The present study aimed to investigate the microvascular regeneration pattern of ANAs in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats.

METHODS

Sixty male SD rats were randomly divided into an autologous group and a rat acellular nerve allograft group (rANA), and 10-mm sciatic nerve defects were induced in these rats. On the 7th, 14th and 21st days after surgery, systemic perfusion with Evans Blue (EB) or lead oxide was performed on the rats through carotid intubation. Samples were then collected for gross observation, and the microvessels in the nerves were reconstructed through microscopic CT scans using MIMICS software. The vascular volume fraction (VF, %) and microvessel growth rate (V, mm/d) in both groups were then measured, and 1 month after surgery, NF-200 staining was performed to observe and compare the growth condition of the axons.

RESULTS

Early post-operative perfusion with gelatin/EB showed EB permeation around the acellular nerve. Perfusion with gelatin/lead oxide showed that the blood vessels had grown into the allograft from both ends 7 days after the operation. Fourteen days after the operation, the microvessel growth rate of the autologous group was faster than that of the rANA group (0.39 ± 0.17 mm/d vs. 0.26 ± 0.14 mm/d, p < 0.05), and the vascular VF was also higher than that of the rANA group (8.92% ± 1.54% vs. 6.31% ± 1.21%, p < 0.05). Twenty-one days after the operation, the blood vessels at both ends of the allograft had connected to form a microvessel network. The growth rate was not significantly different between the two groups; however, the vascular VF of the autologous group was higher than that of the rANA group (12.18% ± 2.27% vs. 9.92% ± 0.84%, p < 0.05). One month after the operation, the NF-200 fluorescence (IOD) in the autologous group significantly increased compared with that of the rANA group (540,278 ± 17,424 vs. 473,310 ± 14,636, respectively, p < 0.05), suggesting that the results of the repair after nerve injury were significantly better in the autologous group than in the rANA group.

CONCLUSION

Both the autologous nerve and ANAs rely on the permeation of tissue fluids to supply nutrients during the early stage, and microvessel growth mainly starts at both ends of the graft and enters the graft along the long axis. Compared to ANAs, the growth speed of revascularization in autologous nerve grafts was faster, leading to a better outcome in the autologous nerve group.