Zandi Souska, Lereuil Théo, Freiberg Florentina, Pfau Maximilian, Pfister Isabel B, Gerhardt Christin, Michels Stephan, Kodjikian Laurent, Garweg Justus G
1 Swiss Eye Institute and Berner Augenklinik am Lindenhofspital , Bern, Switzerland .
2 Hopital de la Croix-Rousse , Lyon, France .
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Oct;33(8):620-628. doi: 10.1089/jop.2017.0020. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
The aim of this study is to assess the effect of repeated injections of dexamethasone implants in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) despite prior therapies.
This retrospective interventional study involved 47 DME-afflicted eyes, which were administered ≥2 intravitreal injections of dexamethasone. Group 1 (34 eyes) received a dexamethasone monotherapy, whereas group 2 (13 eyes) received a combination therapy with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor as needed. The duration of dexamethasone effect until retreatment and the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were defined as outcome measures.
A total of 197 injections of dexamethasone were administered in group 1 and 52 in group 2 during a mean follow-up of 23 ± 10 and 24 ± 13 months, respectively. Mean time to reinjection was 4.6 ± 0.5 (group 1) and 5.3 ± 1.0 months (group 2; P = 0.17). Reinjection intervals did not shorten over time for up to 10 dexamethasone injections per eye in group 1 and BCVA improved from before 1 month after the first implantation, 7.0 letters (P = 0.04). In group 2, there was no significant improvement in BCVA at any time point. CRT decreased from 534 ± 208 and 529 ± 215 μm to 287 ± 115 and 371 ± 78 μm at 3 months and increased to 460 ± 186 μm and 547 ± 175 μm before reinjection (groups1 and 2, respectively). The maximal CRT before each implantation remained stable over time.
In eyes with chronic DME that respond incompletely to prior therapy or require frequent reinjections, dexamethasone shows promising long-term anatomic and functional improvement. The absence of a treatment effect reduction over time argues against a relevant rebound phenomenon.
本研究旨在评估对于既往治疗后仍患有持续性糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的患者,重复注射地塞米松植入剂的效果。
这项回顾性干预研究纳入了47只患DME的眼睛,这些眼睛接受了≥2次玻璃体内地塞米松注射。第1组(34只眼)接受地塞米松单一疗法,而第2组(13只眼)根据需要接受玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子联合疗法。将地塞米松作用直至再次治疗的持续时间以及最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心视网膜厚度(CRT)的变化定义为观察指标。
在平均随访23±10个月和24±13个月期间,第1组共注射地塞米松197次,第2组共注射52次。再次注射的平均时间在第1组为4.6±0.5个月,在第2组为5.3±1.0个月(P = 0.17)。在第1组中,每只眼睛注射多达10次地塞米松时,再次注射间隔并未随时间缩短,且BCVA在首次植入后1个月内较之前有所改善,提高了7.0个字母(P = 0.04)。在第2组中,任何时间点的BCVA均无显著改善。CRT在第1组和第2组中分别在3个月时从534±208和529±215μm降至287±115和371±78μm,并在再次注射前增至460±186μm和547±175μm。每次植入前的最大CRT随时间保持稳定。
在对既往治疗反应不完全或需要频繁再次注射的慢性DME眼中,地塞米松显示出有前景的长期解剖和功能改善。随着时间推移未出现治疗效果降低,这与相关的反弹现象不符。