Johansen L V, Bjerrum P, Illum P
Rhinology. 1987 Mar;25(1):35-40.
In order to evaluate the efficacy of and adverse reactions to terfenadine compared to dexchlorpheniramine, a double blind, group comparative study was carried out in 42 patients suffering from grass-pollen induced allergic rhinitis. The treatment was either terfenadine tablets 60 mg twice daily or dexchlorpheniramine tablets 6 mg twice daily. Nasal and eye symptoms as well as tiredness were rated daily on a scale from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). Terfenadine and dexchlorpheniramine performed almost equally well in keeping symptoms at a mild level with a superiority of dexchlorpheniramine in the control of runny nose. Dexchlorpheniramine was associated with a significant increase in the score for tiredness in contrast to terfenadine which caused no significant change. Two patients in the group treated with dexchlorpheniramine stopped treatment because of tiredness. Other adverse reactions were few, mild and transient.
为了评估特非那定与右氯苯那敏相比的疗效及不良反应,对42例草花粉诱发的过敏性鼻炎患者进行了一项双盲分组对照研究。治疗方案为每日两次服用60毫克特非那定片或每日两次服用6毫克右氯苯那敏片。每天对鼻眼症状以及疲劳程度进行评分,范围从0(无)至3(严重)。在将症状维持在轻度水平方面,特非那定和右氯苯那敏的表现几乎相同,右氯苯那敏在控制流鼻涕方面更具优势。与特非那定未引起显著变化相比,右氯苯那敏与疲劳评分显著增加有关。右氯苯那敏治疗组有两名患者因疲劳而停止治疗。其他不良反应很少,症状轻微且为一过性。