Horak F, Bruttmann G, Pedrali P, Weeke B, Frølund L, Wolff H H, Christophers E
1st Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, University of Vienna, Austria.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1988 Jan;38(1):124-8.
This multicentric study compared 14-day treatment with loratadine (Clarityne) 10 mg once daily, terfenadine 60 mg twice daily and placebo in outpatients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Of 275 patients enrolled, 256 (87 in the loratadine group, 89 in the terfenadine group and 80 in the placebo group) were evaluable for efficacy and 266 (90, 91 and 85 in respective groups) were evaluable for safety. Investigators graded the severity of 4 nasal and 4 nonnasal signs/symptoms and investigators and patients rated overall disease condition and therapeutic response on treatment days 3, 7 and 14; patients recorded when signs/symptoms of rhinitis were relieved, as well. Hematology and blood chemistry tests were conducted before and after therapy, and patients were questioned throughout the study about possible adverse experiences. At all visits, loratadine and terfenadine were significantly superior to placebo (p less than or equal to 0.004), and the two active medications were statistically comparable, based on mean totals of sign/symptom severity scores and ratings of overall disease condition and therapeutic response. By patients' last valid visit, mean totals of sign/symptoms severity scores improved by 56% and 53% for loratadine and terfenadine groups, respectively, but exacerbated by 5% for the placebo group. Moreover, an excellent or a good therapeutic response was observed in 58/87 (67%) loratadine-treated patients and 58/89 (65%) terfenadine-treated patients, as compared to 13/80 (16%) placebo-treated patients (p less than 0.01). A total of 61/76 (30%) patients in the loratadine group and 57/78 (73%) in the terfenadine group versus 22/71 (31%) in the placebo group experienced relief within the first 3 days of therapy (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
这项多中心研究比较了氯雷他定(克敏能)10毫克每日一次、特非那定60毫克每日两次以及安慰剂对季节性变应性鼻炎门诊患者进行14天治疗的效果。在纳入的275例患者中,256例(氯雷他定组87例、特非那定组89例、安慰剂组80例)可进行疗效评估,266例(各组分别为90例、91例和85例)可进行安全性评估。研究者对4项鼻部和4项非鼻部体征/症状的严重程度进行分级,研究者和患者在治疗第3、7和14天对整体疾病状况和治疗反应进行评分;患者也记录鼻炎体征/症状缓解的时间。在治疗前后进行血液学和血液化学检测,并且在整个研究过程中询问患者可能的不良经历。在所有访视中,基于体征/症状严重程度评分的均值总和以及整体疾病状况和治疗反应的评分,氯雷他定和特非那定显著优于安慰剂(p≤0.004),并且两种活性药物在统计学上具有可比性。到患者最后一次有效访视时,氯雷他定组和特非那定组体征/症状严重程度评分的均值总和分别改善了56%和53%,而安慰剂组恶化了5%。此外,氯雷他定治疗的患者中有58/87(67%)、特非那定治疗的患者中有58/89(65%)观察到优或良的治疗反应,相比之下,安慰剂治疗的患者中为13/80(16%)(p<0.01)。氯雷他定组共有61/76(30%)患者、特非那定组有57/78(73%)患者在治疗的前3天内症状得到缓解,而安慰剂组为22/71(31%)(p<0.01)。(摘要截短至250字)