Suppr超能文献

基于人群样本的骨密度与抑郁症状之间的关联。

Association Between Bone Mineral Density and Depressive Symptoms in a Population-Based Sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 May/Jun;79(3). doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m11276.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and depressive symptoms in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the second phase of the Dallas Heart Study (DHS-2), a large, multiethnic population sample in Dallas County, Texas, from September 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009. Depressive symptom severity was measured with the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR₁₆), which is derived from DSM-IV major depressive disorder criteria. BMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Multiple linear regressions examined the relationship between QIDS-SR₁₆ score and BMD controlling for age, body mass index, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, alcohol use status, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration, antidepressant use, and physical activity as measured by total vigorous and moderate metabolic equivalents. Subgroup analyses explored differences related to age.

RESULTS

QIDS-SR₁₆ score was not a significant predictor of either lumbar spine or total hip T-score (β = -0.01, P = .61 and β = -0.02, P = .39) in the overall population (n = 2,285). There was a significant negative interaction term between age and QIDS-SR₁₆ group (β = -0.01, P = .01). In participants aged 60 years or older (n = 465), QIDS-SR₁₆ score was a significant predictor of BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip (β = -0.14, P = .003 and β = -0.12, P = .006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

QIDS-SR₁₆ score did not significantly predict BMD in the overall DHS-2 sample. There was, however, a significant association observed in participants aged ≥ 60 years. Results suggest that diagnosis and treatment of depressive symptoms may be of clinical importance in older individuals, a subgroup at high risk for osteoporosis and fractures.

摘要

目的

本分析旨在确定人群中骨密度(BMD)与抑郁症状之间的关系。

方法

数据来自于 2007 年 9 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间在德克萨斯州达拉斯县进行的大型多民族人群样本达拉斯心脏研究(DHS-2)的第二阶段。使用 16 项抑郁症状快速自评量表(QIDS-SR₁₆)来测量抑郁症状严重程度,该量表源自 DSM-IV 重性抑郁障碍标准。使用双能 X 线吸收法测量 BMD。多元线性回归分析控制年龄、体重指数、性别、种族、吸烟状况、饮酒状况、血清 25-羟维生素 D 浓度、抗抑郁药使用和体力活动(总剧烈和中度代谢当量)后,研究 QIDS-SR₁₆ 评分与 BMD 之间的关系。亚组分析探讨了与年龄相关的差异。

结果

在总体人群(n = 2285)中,QIDS-SR₁₆ 评分与腰椎或全髋 T 评分均无显著相关性(β = -0.01,P =.61 和 β = -0.02,P =.39)。年龄和 QIDS-SR₁₆ 组之间存在显著的负交互项(β = -0.01,P =.01)。在 60 岁或以上的参与者(n = 465)中,QIDS-SR₁₆ 评分与腰椎和全髋的 BMD 显著相关(β = -0.14,P =.003 和 β = -0.12,P =.006)。

结论

在 DHS-2 总体样本中,QIDS-SR₁₆ 评分与 BMD 无显著相关性。然而,在年龄≥60 岁的参与者中观察到了显著的相关性。结果表明,在骨质疏松症和骨折风险较高的老年人群中,抑郁症状的诊断和治疗可能具有重要的临床意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验