Medical student, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141.
One way to provide performance feedback to hospitalists is through the use of dashboards, which deliver data based on agreed-upon standards. Despite the growing trend on feedback performance on quality metrics, there remain limited data on the means, frequency and content of feedback that should be provided to frontline hospitalists.
The objective of our research is to report our experience with a comprehensive feedback system for frontline hospitalists, as well as report the change in our quality metrics after implementation.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement project was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre among our hospitalist group consisting of 46 full-time faculty members.
A monthly performance feedback report was distributed to provide ongoing feedback to our hospitalist faculty, including an individual dashboard and a peer comparison report, complemented by coaching to incorporate process improvement tactics into providers' daily workflow.
The main outcome of our study is the change in quality metrics after implementation of the monthly performance feedback report RESULTS: The dashboard and rank order list were sent to all faculty members every month. An improvement was seen in the following quality metrics: length of stay index, 30-day readmission rate, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, provider component of Healthcare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores, attendance at care coordination rounds and percentage of discharge orders placed by 10:00.
Implementation of a monthly performance feedback report for hospitalists, complemented by peer comparison and guidance on tactics to achieve these metrics, created a culture of quality and improvement in the quality of care delivered.
为医院医师提供绩效反馈的一种方法是使用仪表板,根据商定的标准提供数据。尽管反馈质量指标绩效的趋势日益增长,但仍缺乏关于应向一线医院医师提供的反馈方式、频率和内容的有限数据。
我们研究的目的是报告我们在一线医院医师综合反馈系统方面的经验,并报告实施后的质量指标变化。
设计、设置和参与者:这项质量改进项目在我们的医院医师组(由 46 名全职教师组成)在一家三级学术医疗中心进行。
每月分发绩效反馈报告,为我们的医院医师教师提供持续反馈,包括个人仪表板和同行比较报告,并提供辅导,将流程改进策略纳入提供者的日常工作流程。
我们研究的主要结果是实施每月绩效反馈报告后的质量指标变化。
每月向所有教师发送仪表板和排名列表。以下质量指标有所改善:住院指数、30 天再入院率、导管相关尿路感染、中心静脉相关血流感染、医疗保健消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统评分中的提供者组成部分、参加护理协调轮次的情况以及 10:00 前下达的出院医嘱的百分比。
为医院医师实施每月绩效反馈报告,并辅以同行比较和实现这些指标的策略指导,营造了质量文化,并改善了提供的护理质量。