• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施失血量量化并不能改善对平均失血量分娩中血红蛋白下降的预测。

Implementation of Quantification of Blood Loss Does Not Improve Prediction of Hemoglobin Drop in Deliveries with Average Blood Loss.

作者信息

Hamm Rebecca F, Wang Eileen, Romanos April, O'Rourke Kathleen, Srinivas Sindhu K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health Research Program, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;35(2):134-139. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606275. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1606275
PMID:28838005
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The National Partnership for Maternal Safety released a postpartum hemorrhage bundle in 2015 recommending quantification of blood loss (QBL) for all deliveries. We sought to determine whether QBL more accurately predicts hemoglobin (Hb) drop than visually estimated blood loss (EBL).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective observational study. Preintervention data (PRE) were collected on all deliveries between October 15, 2013 and December 15, 2013. Deliveries were included if EBL, admission Hb, and 12-hour postpartum Hb (12hrCBC) were available. QBL was implemented in July 2015. Postintervention data (POST) were collected between October 20, 2015 and December 20, 2015. A total of 500 mL EBL was predicted to result in 1 g/dL Hb drop at 12hrCBC. Student's -test was used to compare the means.

RESULTS

A total of 592 of 626 (95%) PRE and 583 of 613 (95%) POST deliveries were included. Overall, 278 (48%) POST deliveries had QBL recorded. In both PRE and POST, actual Hb drop differed from predicted by 0.6 g/dL in both groups of deliveries. When evaluating deliveries with EBL > 1,000 mL, QBL in POST was slightly better at predicting Hb drop versus EBL in PRE, although not statistically significant (0.2 vs. 0.5 g/dL,  = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

In all deliveries, QBL does not predict Hb drop more accurately than EBL. The decision to perform QBL needs to balance accuracy with a resource intense measurement process.

摘要

目的

国家孕产妇安全伙伴关系于2015年发布了产后出血综合措施,建议对所有分娩进行失血量量化(QBL)。我们试图确定QBL是否比目测估计失血量(EBL)更准确地预测血红蛋白(Hb)下降。

研究设计

这是一项前瞻性观察性研究。收集了2013年10月15日至2013年12月15日期间所有分娩的干预前数据(PRE)。如果有EBL、入院时Hb和产后12小时Hb(12小时血常规)数据,则纳入分娩病例。QBL于2015年7月实施。收集了2015年10月20日至2015年12月20日期间的干预后数据(POST)。预计12小时血常规时总失血量500 mL会导致Hb下降1 g/dL。采用学生t检验比较均值。

结果

626例(95%)PRE分娩中有592例、613例(95%)POST分娩中有583例被纳入研究。总体而言,278例(48%)POST分娩记录了QBL。在PRE和POST中,两组分娩的实际Hb下降与预测值均相差0.6 g/dL。当评估EBL>1000 mL的分娩时,POST中的QBL在预测Hb下降方面比PRE中的EBL稍好,尽管差异无统计学意义(0.2 vs. 0.5 g/dL,P = 0.17)。

结论

在所有分娩中,QBL预测Hb下降并不比EBL更准确。实施QBL的决定需要在准确性与资源密集的测量过程之间取得平衡。

相似文献

1
Implementation of Quantification of Blood Loss Does Not Improve Prediction of Hemoglobin Drop in Deliveries with Average Blood Loss.实施失血量量化并不能改善对平均失血量分娩中血红蛋白下降的预测。
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;35(2):134-139. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606275. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Effect of Implementing Quantitative Blood Loss Assessment at the Time of Delivery.实施分娩时定量失血量评估的效果。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Nov;36(13):1332-1336. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688823. Epub 2019 May 14.
3
Automated Quantification of Blood Loss versus Visual Estimation in 274 Vaginal Deliveries.274 例阴道分娩中出血量的自动定量与目测估计的比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(10):1031-1035. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701507. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
4
Quantification of Blood Loss Improves Detection of Postpartum Hemorrhage and Accuracy of Postpartum Hemorrhage Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study.失血量量化可提高产后出血的检测率及产后出血率的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 27;13(2):e13591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13591.
5
Impact of measuring quantification of blood loss versus estimation of blood loss during cesarean deliveries.剖宫产术中测量失血量与估计失血量的影响
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;160(2):670-677. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14337. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Institution of a Comprehensive Postpartum Hemorrhage Bundle at a Large Academic Center does not Immediately Reduce Maternal Morbidity.在大型学术中心实施全面产后出血套餐并不能立即降低产妇发病率。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jan;36(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1629910. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Assessing reVITALize: Should the Definition of Postpartum Hemorrhage Differ by Mode of Delivery?评估“恢复活力”研究:产后出血的定义是否应因分娩方式而异?
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Apr;34(5):503-507. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593535. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
8
Introduction of standardized, cumulative quantitative measurement of blood loss into routine maternity care.将标准化的、累积的失血量定量测量引入常规产科护理。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Apr;35(8):1491-1497. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1759534. Epub 2020 May 4.
9
Effect of Quantification of Blood Loss on Activation of a Postpartum Hemorrhage Protocol and Use of Resources.出血量量化对产后出血方案激活和资源使用的影响。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Mar;49(2):137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
10
External Validation of Postpartum Hemorrhage Prediction Models Using Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据对产后出血预测模型进行外部验证。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Apr;41(5):598-605. doi: 10.1055/a-1745-1348. Epub 2022 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the implementation of maternal safety bundles for obstetric hemorrhage and severe hypertension during pregnancy in Arkansas.评估阿肯色州孕期产科出血和重度高血压产妇安全综合措施的实施情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07896-3.
2
Quantitative blood loss values reveal high rates of undiagnosed postpartum hemorrhage.定量失血值显示未诊断出的产后出血发生率很高。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Aug;170(2):614-620. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70037. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
3
Hemoglobin and Its Relationship with Fatigue in Long-COVID Patients Three to Six Months after SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
新冠病毒感染三至六个月后长期新冠患者的血红蛋白及其与疲劳的关系
Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 1;12(6):1234. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061234.
4
Predictive Modelling of Postpartum Haemorrhage Using Early Risk Factors: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical and Machine Learning Models.利用早期风险因素预测产后出血:统计和机器学习模型的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 7;21(5):600. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050600.
5
Review of Current Insights and Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Refractory Postpartum Hemorrhage.难治性产后出血治疗的当前见解与治疗方法综述
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Jun 1;15:905-926. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S366675. eCollection 2023.
6
Incidence and predictors of severe postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean delivery in South Central Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study.中埃塞南部剖宫产术后严重产后出血的发生率及预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 3;13(1):3635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30839-x.
7
Machine learning approach to predict postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review protocol.机器学习预测产后出血的方法:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):e067661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067661.
8
Limitations of Gravimetric Quantitative Blood Loss during Cesarean Delivery.剖宫产术中重量法测定失血量的局限性。
AJP Rep. 2022 Feb 4;12(1):e36-e40. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1742267. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Quantification of Blood Loss Improves Detection of Postpartum Hemorrhage and Accuracy of Postpartum Hemorrhage Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study.失血量量化可提高产后出血的检测率及产后出血率的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 27;13(2):e13591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13591.
10
Implementation Science is Imperative to the Optimization of Obstetric Care.实施科学对于优化产科护理至关重要。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Jun;38(7):643-648. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721728. Epub 2020 Dec 15.