Suppr超能文献

评估阿肯色州孕期产科出血和重度高血压产妇安全综合措施的实施情况。

Evaluating the implementation of maternal safety bundles for obstetric hemorrhage and severe hypertension during pregnancy in Arkansas.

作者信息

Peng Cheng, Acharya Mahip, Khattab Batool, Callaghan-Koru Jennifer A, Brown Dawn, Perkins Rosalyn, Eswaran Hari

机构信息

Divison of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Institute for Digital Health & Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07896-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal mortality remains a critical public health concern in the U.S., with rising rates in recent years. Obstetric hemorrhage and hypertension in pregnancy are leading causes of preventable maternal mortality and morbidity. Maternal safety bundles, developed by the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health, provide guidelines to improve maternal health outcomes. This study examined the implementation of obstetric hemorrhage and severe hypertension safety bundles in Arkansas hospitals, identifying factors associated with successful adoption.

METHODS

Safety bundle implementation data were collected from 37 hospitals in the third quarter of 2023. Hospital characteristics were obtained from the American Hospital Association database. Implementation index scores were calculated as the percentage of recommended elements adopted, both overall and within specific domains. Descriptive statistics summarized hospital characteristics and implementation status. Implementation differences across domains were assessed using Friedman's test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while between-bundle comparisons were evaluated using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

A total of 23 hospitals (62%) were in the urban region, while 14 hospitals (38%) were located in rural areas. In the obstetrical hemorrhage bundle, Readiness domain had significantly higher implementation than Recognition and Prevention (p = 0.0005) and Reporting and Systems Learning domains (p < 0.0001). In the severe hypertension bundle, Readiness (p < 0.0001), Recognition and Prevention (p = 0.0035), and Response (p < 0.0001) domains all had higher scores than Reporting and Systems Learning domain. The Recognition and Prevention domain had significantly higher implementation in the severe hypertension bundle than in the obstetrical hemorrhage bundle (p = 0.0351). Urban hospitals had significantly higher obstetrical hemorrhage bundle implementation scores than rural hospitals (p = 0.0121). Hospitals with more full-time facility personnel and registered nurses demonstrated better implementation of both obstetrical hemorrhage (facility personnel: p = 0.0454; registered nurses: p = 0.0126) and severe hypertension (facility personnel: p = 0.0180; registered nurses: p = 0.0093) bundles.

CONCLUSIONS

Readiness components were the most frequently implemented, while Reporting and Systems Learning elements had lower adoption rates. Urban hospitals had higher obstetric hemorrhage bundle implementation levels than rural hospitals. Hospitals with greater staffing resources, particularly full-time facility personnel and registered nurses, demonstrated better implementation of safety bundles. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to enhance maternal safety bundle adoption, especially in rural hospitals and under-implemented domains.

摘要

背景

孕产妇死亡率在美国仍然是一个关键的公共卫生问题,近年来呈上升趋势。产科出血和妊娠期高血压是可预防的孕产妇死亡和发病的主要原因。由孕产妇健康创新联盟制定的孕产妇安全综合措施提供了改善孕产妇健康结局的指导方针。本研究调查了阿肯色州医院产科出血和严重高血压安全综合措施的实施情况,确定了与成功采用相关的因素。

方法

收集了2023年第三季度37家医院安全综合措施的实施数据。医院特征来自美国医院协会数据库。实施指数得分计算为所采用的推荐要素的百分比,包括总体和特定领域内的百分比。描述性统计总结了医院特征和实施状况。使用弗里德曼检验和威尔科克森符号秩检验评估各领域之间的实施差异,而使用威尔科克森-曼-惠特尼检验评估不同综合措施之间的比较。

结果

共有23家医院(62%)位于城市地区,14家医院(38%)位于农村地区。在产科出血综合措施中,准备领域的实施情况显著高于识别与预防领域(p = 0.0005)和报告与系统学习领域(p < 0.0001)。在严重高血压综合措施中,准备领域(p < 0.0001)、识别与预防领域(p = 0.0035)和应对领域(p < 0.0001)的得分均高于报告与系统学习领域。识别与预防领域在严重高血压综合措施中的实施情况显著高于产科出血综合措施(p = 0.0351)。城市医院的产科出血综合措施实施得分显著高于农村医院(p = 0.0121)。全职医院工作人员和注册护士较多的医院在产科出血(医院工作人员:p = 0.0454;注册护士:p = 0.0126)和严重高血压(医院工作人员:p = 0.0180;注册护士:p = 0.0093)综合措施方面的实施情况更好。

结论

准备部分是实施最频繁的,而报告与系统学习要素的采用率较低。城市医院的产科出血综合措施实施水平高于农村医院。人员配备资源更多的医院,特别是全职医院工作人员和注册护士,在安全综合措施的实施方面表现更好。研究结果凸显了有针对性干预措施的必要性,以提高孕产妇安全综合措施的采用率,尤其是在农村医院和实施不足的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7a7/12302679/042b7e518378/12884_2025_7896_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验