Hicks J Kevin, Saller James, Wang Emilie, Boyle Theresa, Gray Jhanelle E
DeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;111:135-138. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) is emerging as a noninvasive technique for detecting targetable mutations. We describe two lung adenocarcinoma cases that show the clinical utility of supplementing tumor biopsy molecular interrogation with ctDNA NGS. For both cases, ctDNA NGS identified actionable mutations that were previously not reported by molecular interrogation of tissue. Explanations are provided for the observed differences between ctDNA and tumor biopsy genomic results along with considerations for reconciling findings. Case 1 consisted of a patient with multiple lesions in the left and right lung that was initially suspected to be related to malignancy. A tumor biopsy was positive for EGFR-mutated lung cancer. ctDNA NGS reported an activating KRAS mutation, which was unexpected given the rare occurrence of EGFR/KRAS co-mutations. Radiologic imaging and ctDNA NGS resulted in the diagnoses of synchronous EGFR-mutated left lung cancer and KRAS-mutated right lung cancer. The second case describes a patient who was negative for RET rearrangements by tissue interrogation, but positive for a RET-KIF5B fusion by ctDNA NGS. Further tissue analysis demonstrated heterogeneity was the cause of differing results. We demonstrate that supplementing tumor biopsies with ctDNA NGS has a crucial role in patient care. Understanding the causes of differing ctDNA and tumor biopsy genomic results is essential for reconciling findings and application to precision medicine management.
游离循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)下一代测序(NGS)正在成为一种检测可靶向突变的非侵入性技术。我们描述了两例肺腺癌病例,展示了用ctDNA NGS补充肿瘤活检分子检测的临床效用。对于这两个病例,ctDNA NGS都鉴定出了可操作的突变,而这些突变在组织分子检测中此前并未报告。文中对观察到的ctDNA与肿瘤活检基因组结果之间的差异给出了解释,并对协调结果的注意事项进行了讨论。病例1是一名左右肺均有多处病变的患者,最初怀疑与恶性肿瘤有关。肿瘤活检显示为EGFR突变型肺癌阳性。鉴于EGFR/KRAS共突变罕见,ctDNA NGS报告了一个激活型KRAS突变,这在意料之外。放射影像学检查和ctDNA NGS诊断为同步性EGFR突变型左肺癌和KRAS突变型右肺癌。第二个病例描述的是一名患者,其组织检测RET重排为阴性,但ctDNA NGS检测RET-KIF5B融合为阳性。进一步的组织分析表明,结果差异的原因是异质性。我们证明,用ctDNA NGS补充肿瘤活检在患者护理中具有关键作用。了解ctDNA与肿瘤活检基因组结果不同的原因对于协调结果并应用于精准医学管理至关重要。