Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Oct;75:91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
Hand stereotypies (HS) are a primary diagnostic criterion for Rett syndrome (RTT) but are difficult to characterize and quantify systematically.
We collected video on 27 girls (2-12 years of age) with classic RTT who participated in a mecasermin trial. The present study focused exclusively on video analyses, by reviewing two five-minute windows per subject to identify the two most common HS. Three raters with expertise in movement disorders independently rated the five-minute windows using standardized terminology to determine the level of agreement. We iteratively refined the protocol in three stages to improve descriptive accuracy, categorizing HS as "central" or "peripheral," "simple" or "complex," scoring each hand separately. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistics.
In the initial protocol evaluating HS by video, inter-rater agreement was 20.7%. In the final protocol, inter-rater agreement for the two most frequent HS was higher than the initial protocol at 50%.
Phenotypic variability makes standardized evaluation of HS in RTT a challenge; we achieved only 50% level of agreement and only for the most frequent HS. Therefore, objective measures are needed to evaluate HS.
手刻板动作(HS)是雷特综合征(RTT)的主要诊断标准,但难以系统地进行特征描述和量化。
我们收集了 27 名患有经典 RTT 的女孩(2-12 岁)的视频,这些女孩参加了 mecasermin 试验。本研究仅专注于视频分析,通过对每个受试者的两个五分钟窗口进行回顾,以确定两种最常见的 HS。三名具有运动障碍专业知识的评分员使用标准化术语对五分钟窗口进行独立评分,以确定一致性水平。我们通过三个阶段逐步改进方案,以提高描述准确性,将 HS 分类为“中央”或“周围”、“简单”或“复杂”,分别对每只手进行评分。使用 Kappa 统计分析了组内一致性。
在最初通过视频评估 HS 的方案中,组内一致性为 20.7%。在最终方案中,对于两种最常见的 HS,组内一致性高于初始方案,达到 50%。
表型变异性使得 RTT 中 HS 的标准化评估具有挑战性;我们仅达到了 50%的一致性,且仅针对最常见的 HS。因此,需要客观的措施来评估 HS。