• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肝脏手术从创新到应用再到精通的演进:来自4个欧洲专业中心的2238例患者的围手术期及肿瘤学结局

Evolution of Laparoscopic Liver Surgery from Innovation to Implementation to Mastery: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of 2,238 Patients from 4 European Specialized Centers.

作者信息

Berardi Giammauro, Van Cleven Stijn, Fretland Åsmund Avdem, Barkhatov Leonid, Halls Mark, Cipriani Federica, Aldrighetti Luca, Abu Hilal Mohammed, Edwin Bjørn, Troisi Roberto I

机构信息

Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium.

The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):639-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.006
PMID:28838869
Abstract

BACKGROUND

First seen as an innovation for select patients, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has evolved since its introduction, resulting in worldwide use. Despite this, it is still limited mainly to referral centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate a large cohort undergoing LLR from 2000 to 2015, focusing on the technical approaches, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and evolution of practice over time.

STUDY DESIGN

The demographics and indications, intraoperative, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes of 2,238 patients were evaluated. Trends in practice and outcomes over time were assessed.

RESULTS

The percentage of LLR performed yearly has increased from 5% in 2000 to 43% in 2015. Pure laparoscopy was used in 98.3% of cases. Wedge resections were the most common operation; they were predominant at the beginning of LLR and then decreased and remained steady at approximately 53%. Major hepatectomies were initially uncommon, then increased and reached a stable level at approximately 16%. Overall, 410 patients underwent resection in the posterosuperior segments; these were more frequent with time, and the highest percentage was in 2015 (26%). Blood loss, operative time, and conversion rate improved significantly with time. The 5-year overall survival rates were 73% and 54% for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), respectively. The 5-year, recurrence-free survival rates were 50% and 37% for HCC and CRLM, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Since laparoscopy was introduced, a long implementation process has been necessary to allow for standardization and improvement in surgical care, mastery of the technique, and the ability to obtain good perioperative results with safe oncologic outcomes.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)最初被视为针对特定患者的一项创新技术,自引入以来不断发展,现已在全球范围内得到应用。尽管如此,它仍主要局限于转诊中心。本研究的目的是评估2000年至2015年接受LLR的一大群患者,重点关注技术方法、围手术期和肿瘤学结局以及随时间推移的实践演变。

研究设计

评估了2238例患者的人口统计学和适应证、术中、围手术期及肿瘤学结局。评估了随时间推移实践和结局的趋势。

结果

每年进行LLR的比例从2000年的5%增加到2015年的43%。98.3%的病例采用单纯腹腔镜手术。楔形切除术是最常见的手术方式;在LLR开始时占主导地位,随后减少并稳定在约53%。大肝切除术最初不常见,随后增加并稳定在约16%。总体而言,410例患者接受了后上段切除术;随着时间的推移,此类手术更为频繁,2015年的比例最高(26%)。随着时间的推移,失血量、手术时间和中转率显著改善。肝细胞癌(HCC)和结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的5年总生存率分别为73%和54%。HCC和CRLM的5年无复发生存率分别为50%和37%。

结论

自腹腔镜技术引入以来,需要一个漫长的实施过程来实现手术护理的标准化和改进、技术的掌握以及在确保肿瘤学结局安全的情况下获得良好的围手术期效果。

相似文献

1
Evolution of Laparoscopic Liver Surgery from Innovation to Implementation to Mastery: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of 2,238 Patients from 4 European Specialized Centers.腹腔镜肝脏手术从创新到应用再到精通的演进:来自4个欧洲专业中心的2238例患者的围手术期及肿瘤学结局
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):639-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterosuperior segments.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝后上段肝细胞癌的比较
Surg Endosc. 2015 Oct;29(10):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4214-x. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
3
Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.倾向评分匹配下腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期及围手术期结局:一项多机构日本研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):721-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.276. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
Outcome after laparoscopic and open resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver.腹腔镜与开腹肝后上段切除术的疗效比较。
Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):751-759. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10489. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
5
A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.一项关于腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的倾向评分匹配病例对照比较研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Dec;24(12):872-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0273.
6
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.腹腔镜与开腹保肝实质肝切除术在后上叶段:病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1478-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5835-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterosuperior segments or anterolateral segments: A case-matched analysis.位于肝后上段或肝前外侧段的肝细胞癌的腹腔镜肝切除术比较:病例匹配分析
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1219-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
8
Favorable Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Laparoscopic Liver Resection.腹腔镜肝切除术后肝细胞癌的良好长期肿瘤学结局
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Jun;26(6):447-52. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0534. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: 10-year single-center experience.肝硬化患者肝细胞癌的腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心10年经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):638-648. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4253-3. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
10
Operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases located in the posterosuperior liver: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗位于后上肝的结直肠癌肝转移的手术和短期肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1776-1786. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5861-x. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (ORANGE Segments): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放保留实质的肝后上段(橙色段)肝切除术:一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Feb 20;51:101228. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101228. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Complete transition from laparoscopic to robotic liver surgery achieves superior outcomes in difficult hepatectomies: a seven-year retrospective study.完全从腹腔镜肝手术过渡到机器人肝手术在困难肝切除术中取得了更好的结果:一项七年回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1600-1608. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11474-7. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
3
Combining occlusion of the right hepatic vein with the Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic anatomic right posterior liver resection.
在腹腔镜解剖性右后肝切除术中联合应用右肝静脉阻断与Pringle手法。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7627-7633. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11363-z. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
4
Is prolonged operative time associated with postoperative complications in liver surgery? An international multicentre cohort study of 5424 patients.肝脏手术中手术时间延长与术后并发症有关吗?一项对5424例患者的国际多中心队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7118-7130. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11276-x. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
5
The differential benefit of laparoscopic over open minor liver resection for lesions situated in the anterolateral or posterosuperior segments.对于位于前外侧或后上段的病变,腹腔镜下小肝切除术相对于开腹小肝切除术的差异获益。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Aug 1;13(4):604-615. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-494. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术在各种情况下的比较:一项 10075 例患者的国际多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jul 1;280(1):108-117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006267. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
7
Comparison of clinical outcome between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy of high difficulty score for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗高难度评分肝细胞癌的临床疗效比较:倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):857-871. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10634-5. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Current status of liver surgery for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: the NON.LI.MET. Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE) and Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe (ACIE) collaborative international survey.非结直肠神经内分泌肝转移瘤的肝外科治疗现状:意大利内镜外科学和新技术协会(SICE)与欧洲意大利外科医生协会(ACIE)合作的国际调查。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01649-7. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
9
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Short- and Long-Term Results.肝门部胆管癌的微创手术:短期和长期结果的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 3;15(11):3048. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113048.
10
Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic major hepatectomies.体重指数对腹腔镜下肝切除术围手术期结局的影响。
Surgery. 2023 Aug;174(2):259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.016. Epub 2023 Jun 3.