Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开腹保肝实质肝切除术在后上叶段:病例匹配研究。

Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.

机构信息

Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.

HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, CHUM St-Luc, University of Montreal, 1058 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X 3J4, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1478-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5835-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with lesions in the posterosuperior (PS) segments of the liver have been considered poor candidates for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). This study aims to compare short-term outcomes of LLR and open liver resections (OLR) in the PS segments.

METHODS

This multicenter study consisted of all patients who underwent LLR in the PS segments and all patients who underwent OLR in the PS segments between October 2011 and July 2016. Laparoscopic cases were case-matched with those who had an identical open procedure during the same period based on tumor location (same segment) and the Brisbane classification of the resection. Demographics, comorbid factors, perioperative outcomes, short-term outcomes, necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy, and the interval between surgery and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy were compared between the two groups. Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained electronic database.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable for age, sex, ASA score, maximum tumor diameter, and number of patients with additional liver resections outside the posterior segments. Operative time was similar in both groups (median 140 min; p = 0.92). Blood loss was less in the LLR-group (median: 150 vs. 300 ml in OLR-group). Median hospital stay was 6 days in both groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications (OLR-group: 31.4% vs. LLR-group: 25.7%; p = 0.60). There was no significant difference in R0 resections (LLR: 97.2 vs. 100% in OLR; p = 1.00). Tumor-free margins were less in the LLR group (LLR: 5 vs. 9.5 mm in OLR; p = 0.012). Patients undergoing LLR were treated with chemotherapy sooner compared to those undergoing OLR (41 vs. 56 days, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that laparoscopic parenchymal preserving liver resections in the PS segments can be performed with comparable short-term outcomes as similar OLR. The shorter interval to chemotherapy might provide long-term oncologic benefits in patients who underwent LLR.

摘要

背景

肝脏后上(PS)段病变的患者被认为是腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)的较差候选者。本研究旨在比较 PS 段 LLR 和开腹肝切除术(OLR)的短期结果。

方法

这项多中心研究包括 2011 年 10 月至 2016 年 7 月期间接受 PS 段 LLR 的所有患者,以及接受 PS 段 OLR 的所有患者。腹腔镜病例根据肿瘤位置(同一节段)和布里斯班切除术分类,与同期相同开放手术的病例进行匹配。比较两组患者的一般资料、合并症因素、围手术期结果、短期结果、辅助化疗的必要性以及手术与辅助化疗开始之间的时间间隔。数据从一个前瞻性维护的电子数据库中检索。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别、ASA 评分、最大肿瘤直径和额外在后段以外进行的肝切除术患者数量均相似。两组手术时间相似(中位数 140 分钟;p=0.92)。LLR 组出血量较少(中位数:150 比 OLR 组 300ml)。两组患者的中位住院时间均为 6 天。两组术后并发症无显著差异(OLR 组:31.4%vs.LLR 组:25.7%;p=0.60)。两组 R0 切除率无显著差异(LLR:97.2%vs.OLR:100%;p=1.00)。LLR 组肿瘤切缘无显著差异(LLR:5mmvs.OLR:9.5mm;p=0.012)。与接受 OLR 的患者相比,接受 LLR 的患者接受化疗的时间更早(41 天 vs.56 天,p=0.02)。

结论

本研究表明,PS 段腹腔镜保肝切除术可获得与类似 OLR 相当的短期结果。与接受 OLR 的患者相比,接受 LLR 的患者接受化疗的时间更早,这可能为接受 LLR 的患者带来长期的肿瘤学获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验