Suppr超能文献

虐待和忽视儿童风险家长识别工具(IPARAN)的同时效度、区分能力和可行性。

Concurrent validity, discriminatory power and feasibility of the instrument for Identification of Parents At Risk for child Abuse and Neglect (IPARAN).

作者信息

Horrevorts Esther M B, van Grieken Amy, Mieloo Cathelijne L, Hafkamp-de Groen Esther, Bannink Rienke, Bouwmeester-Landweer Merian B R, Broeren Suzanne, Raat Hein

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Municipality of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 23;7(8):e016140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016140.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility, concurrent validity and discriminatory power of the instrument for Identification of Parents At Risk for child Abuse and Neglect (IPARAN) among Dutch parents with a newborn child.

SETTING

Community paediatrics.

PARTICIPANTS

Data from a controlled trial were used. In total, 2659 Dutch parents with a newborn child were invited to participate. Of the 2659 parents, 759 parents filled in the consent form and participated in the study.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Concurrent validity was determined by calculating correlations-using the Pearson's correlation (r)-between the IPARAN score and related constructs from the following instruments: the Empowerment Questionnaire 2.0, the Family Functioning Questionnaire and the Parenting Stress Questionnaire. Discriminatory power was determined by calculating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves between high-risk mothers and low-risk mothers according to their scores on the related constructs. Feasibility was determined by examining the percentage of missing answers.

RESULTS

In terms of concurrent validity, we found that 3 out of 12 correlations between the IPARAN score and related constructs were strong (ie, r>0.50) and 4 out of 12 were medium (ie, r=0.30-0.49). In terms of discriminatory power, mothers with a score in the borderline/clinical range or lowest 10 percent (P10) range of the related constructs (high-risk mothers) had a higher IPARAN score than mothers with a score in the normal range or highest 90 percent (P90) range of the related constructs (low-risk mothers). Effect sizes varied from d=0.37 to d=1.93, and the area under the ROC curve varied from 0.62 to 0.93. Regarding feasibility, the part of the IPARAN filled in by the mother had on average 0.7% missing answers, whereas the part of the IPARAN filled in by the father had on average 1.7% missing answers.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support the concurrent validity, discriminatory power and feasibility of the IPARAN among a population of Dutch parents with a newborn child.

摘要

目的

确定虐待和忽视儿童风险家长识别工具(IPARAN)在荷兰有新生儿的家长群体中的可行性、同时效度和区分能力。

设置

社区儿科学。

参与者

使用了一项对照试验的数据。总共邀请了2659名荷兰有新生儿的家长参与。在这2659名家长中,759名家长填写了同意书并参与了研究。

主要和次要结局指标

通过计算IPARAN得分与以下工具的相关结构之间的相关性(使用Pearson相关系数r)来确定同时效度:赋权问卷2.0、家庭功能问卷和育儿压力问卷。根据高危母亲和低危母亲在相关结构上的得分计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来确定区分能力。通过检查缺失答案的百分比来确定可行性。

结果

在同时效度方面,我们发现IPARAN得分与相关结构之间的12个相关性中有3个较强(即r>0.50),12个中有4个中等(即r = 0.30 - 0.49)。在区分能力方面,在相关结构的临界/临床范围或最低10%(P10)范围内得分的母亲(高危母亲)的IPARAN得分高于在相关结构的正常范围或最高90%(P90)范围内得分的母亲(低危母亲)。效应大小从d = 0.37到d = 1.93不等,ROC曲线下面积从0.62到0.93不等。关于可行性,母亲填写的IPARAN部分平均有0.7%的缺失答案,而父亲填写的IPARAN部分平均有1.7%的缺失答案。

结论

本研究结果支持IPARAN在荷兰有新生儿的家长群体中的同时效度、区分能力和可行性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验