Fuentes Agustin
Department of Anthropology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Interface Focus. 2017 Oct 6;7(5):20160136. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0136. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
The concept of a 'human nature' or 'human natures' retains a central role in theorizing about the human experience. In it is clear that we have a suite of capacities generated via our evolutionary past, and present, and a flexible capacity to create and sustain particular kinds of cultures and to be shaped by them. Regardless of whether we label these capacities 'human natures' or not, humans occupy a distinctive niche and an evolutionary approach to examining it is critical. At present we are faced with a few different narratives as to exactly what such an evolutionary approach entails. There is a need for a robust and dynamic theoretical toolkit in order to develop a richer, and more nuanced, understanding of the cognitively sophisticated genus and the diverse sorts of niches humans constructed and occupied across the Pleistocene, Holocene, and into the Anthropocene. Here I review current evolutionary approaches to 'human nature', arguing that we benefit from re-framing our investigations via the concept of the human niche and in the context of the extended evolutionary synthesis (EES). While not a replacement of standard evolutionary approaches, this is an expansion and enhancement of our toolkit. I offer brief examples from human evolution in support of these assertions.
“人性”或“多种人性”的概念在关于人类体验的理论化过程中仍然占据核心地位。很明显,我们拥有一系列经由进化的过去和现在所产生的能力,以及创造和维系特定文化类型并受其塑造的灵活能力。无论我们是否将这些能力称为“人性”,人类都占据着一个独特的生态位,采用进化方法来审视它至关重要。目前,关于这种进化方法究竟包含什么,我们面临着几种不同的说法。为了更深入、更细致地理解这个认知复杂的属类,以及人类在更新世、全新世直至人类世所构建和占据的各种不同生态位,需要一个强大而动态的理论工具包。在此,我回顾当前关于“人性”的进化方法,认为我们通过人类生态位的概念并在扩展进化综合理论(EES)的背景下重新构建我们的研究能有所收获。这并非是对标准进化方法的替代,而是对我们工具包的扩展和强化。我提供人类进化的简要例子来支持这些观点。