Suppr超能文献

人类进化的技术条件:作为基础科学的石器研究

The Technological Condition of Human Evolution: Lithic Studies as Basic Science.

作者信息

Hussain Shumon Tobias, Soressi Marie

机构信息

Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University, Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark.

Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333CC Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Paleolit Archaeol. 2021;4(3):25. doi: 10.1007/s41982-021-00098-1. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

Abstract

The recent elaboration and rapid expansion of aDNA, paleoproteomics, and related fields have propelled a profound "biomolecular turn" in archaeology and fundamentally changed the topology of archaeological knowledge production. Such a transformation of the archaeological research landscape is not without consequence for long-standing research practices in the field, such as lithic analysis. This special issue derives from the session organized by the authors at the UISPP World Congress in Paris in 2018, which aimed to explore the future of lithic studies. An underlying theme of our session was the felt need to respond to the increasing marginalization of lithic research in terms of its capacity to (1) contribute to the grand narratives of early human evolution and (2) better articulate the role and significance of lithic studies in interdisciplinary human origins research. In this editorial, we briefly outline some of the questions and challenges raised by the biomolecular turn and advocate for a more self-conscious and reflexive stance among lithic experts. We argue that lithic studies fulfill all necessary requirements to act as a basic science for human origins research and that its role and status depends less on technological advances, such as, e.g., improved computing facilities, novel analytical software, or automated shape capture technologies, than on continuous work on the conceptual and methodological foundations of inquiry. We finally draw attention to the unique capability of lithic studies to shed light on the human technological condition and illustrate this potential by introducing and briefly discussing the papers included in this issue.

摘要

古DNA、古蛋白质组学及相关领域最近的精心研究和迅速发展推动了考古学领域深刻的“生物分子转向”,并从根本上改变了考古知识生产的格局。考古研究格局的这种转变对该领域长期以来的研究实践(如石器分析)并非没有影响。本期特刊源自作者于2018年在巴黎举行的国际史前与原史科学联盟世界大会上组织的一场会议,其目的是探索石器研究的未来。我们会议的一个潜在主题是,人们感到有必要应对石器研究在以下方面日益边缘化的问题:(1)对早期人类进化的宏大叙事做出贡献的能力;(2)更好地阐明石器研究在跨学科人类起源研究中的作用和意义。在这篇社论中,我们简要概述了生物分子转向引发的一些问题和挑战,并倡导石器专家采取更自觉和反思的立场。我们认为,石器研究满足作为人类起源研究基础科学的所有必要条件,其作用和地位与其说取决于技术进步(如改进的计算设备、新颖的分析软件或自动形状捕捉技术),不如说取决于在研究的概念和方法基础上的持续努力。我们最后提请注意石器研究在揭示人类技术状况方面的独特能力,并通过介绍和简要讨论本期所收录的论文来说明这种潜力。

相似文献

1
The Technological Condition of Human Evolution: Lithic Studies as Basic Science.
J Paleolit Archaeol. 2021;4(3):25. doi: 10.1007/s41982-021-00098-1. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
2
Curated character of the Initial Upper Palaeolithic lithic artefact assemblages in Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria).
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 4;19(9):e0307435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307435. eCollection 2024.
3
Inferring cultural reproduction from lithic data: A critical review.
Evol Anthropol. 2023 Apr;32(2):83-99. doi: 10.1002/evan.21964. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
Lithic raw material acquisition and use by early Homo sapiens at Skhul, Israel.
J Hum Evol. 2019 Feb;127:149-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.005. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Characterizing the Late Pleistocene MSA Lithic Technology of Sibudu, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e98359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098359. eCollection 2014.
7
Primate archaeology 3.0.
Am J Biol Anthropol. 2024 Mar;183(3):e24835. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24835. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
8
The behavioral and cultural stratigraphic contexts of the lithic assemblages from Schöningen.
J Hum Evol. 2015 Dec;89:287-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
9
The dawn of the Middle Paleolithic in Atapuerca: the lithic assemblage of TD10.1 from Gran Dolina.
J Hum Evol. 2020 Aug;145:102812. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102812. Epub 2020 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Materiality, Agency and Evolution of Lithic Technology: an Integrated Perspective for Palaeolithic Archaeology.
J Archaeol Method Theory. 2021;28(2):617-670. doi: 10.1007/s10816-020-09483-6. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
The cognitive science of technology.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;25(11):964-977. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
3
Operationalizing niche construction theory with stone tools.
Evol Anthropol. 2021 Jan;30(1):28-39. doi: 10.1002/evan.21881. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Muscle recruitment and stone tool use ergonomics across three million years of Palaeolithic technological transitions.
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102796. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Ancient Biomolecules and Evolutionary Inference.
Annu Rev Biochem. 2018 Jun 20;87:1029-1060. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012002. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Two million years of flaking stone and the evolutionary efficiency of stone tool technology.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Apr;2(4):628-633. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0488-4. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
7
Occasional, obligatory, and habitual stone tool use in hominin evolution.
Evol Anthropol. 2017 Sep;26(5):200-217. doi: 10.1002/evan.21547.
8
Human niche, human behaviour, human nature.
Interface Focus. 2017 Oct 6;7(5):20160136. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0136. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
[aDNA Research From a Historical Perspective].
NTM. 2017 Mar;25(1):99-142. doi: 10.1007/s00048-017-0168-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验