Suppr超能文献

扰动作用点在垂直姿势控制中的作用。

Role of point of application of perturbation in control of vertical posture.

作者信息

Chen Bing, Lee Yun-Ju, Aruin Alexander S

机构信息

PhD Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3449-3457. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5069-2. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

The role of point of application of perturbation in the anticipatory (APAs) and compensatory (CPAs) postural control was studied. Twelve healthy participants stood on a sliding board (that was either locked and as such motionless or unlocked and as such free to move in the anterior-posterior direction). The body perturbations were applied either to the shoulders (by a pendulum impact) or the feet (by the movement of the sliding board). Electromyographic activity (EMG) of the trunk and lower extremity muscles was recorded. Latencies, integrals of EMG and muscle co-contraction (C) and reciprocal (R) activation indices were calculated and analyzed within the intervals typical for the APAs and CPAs. Higher EMG integrals were seen in the APAs phase when perturbation was applied to the shoulders. Reciprocal activation of muscles was seen in the APAs phase in the shoulders perturbation condition, while co-contraction was seen in the feet perturbation condition. Co-contraction was observed within the CPA phase in both experimental conditions. Higher C values were found in the feet perturbation condition in the CPA phase. The results suggest that different motor control strategies are employed by the central nervous system when encounter perturbations of similar magnitude but applied to different parts of the body. The outcome highlights the importance of investigation of the role of the point of application of the perturbation.

摘要

研究了扰动作用点在预期性姿势调整(APAs)和补偿性姿势调整(CPAs)中的作用。12名健康参与者站在一块滑板上(滑板要么锁定从而静止不动,要么解锁从而可在前后方向自由移动)。身体扰动要么施加于肩部(通过摆锤冲击),要么施加于足部(通过滑板的移动)。记录了躯干和下肢肌肉的肌电图活动(EMG)。计算并分析了APAs和CPAs典型时间段内的潜伏期、EMG积分以及肌肉协同收缩(C)和交互(R)激活指数。当扰动施加于肩部时,在APAs阶段观察到更高的EMG积分。在肩部扰动条件下的APAs阶段观察到肌肉的交互激活,而在足部扰动条件下观察到协同收缩。在两种实验条件下的CPAs阶段均观察到协同收缩。在CPAs阶段,足部扰动条件下的C值更高。结果表明,当遇到幅度相似但施加于身体不同部位的扰动时,中枢神经系统会采用不同的运动控制策略。该结果突出了研究扰动作用点作用的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验