Kim Youngwook, Vakula Michael N, Bolton David A E, Dakin Christopher J, Thompson Brennan J, Slocum Timothy A, Teramoto Masaru, Bressel Eadric
Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jan 18;13:764826. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.764826. eCollection 2021.
Reactive balance is the last line of defense to prevent a fall when the body loses stability, and beneficial effects of various exercise-based interventions on reactive balance in older adults have been reported. However, their pooled evidence on the relative effects has yet to be described.
To review and evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various exercise-based interventions on reactive balance in older adults.
Nine electronic databases and reference lists were searched from inception to August 2021. Eligibility criteria according to PICOS criteria were as follows: (1) population: older adults with the mean age of 65 years or above; (2) intervention and comparison: at least two distinct exercise interventions or one exercise intervention with a no-exercise controlled intervention (NE) compared in each trial; (3) outcome: at least one measure of reactive balance; (4) study: randomized controlled trial. The main network meta-analysis was performed on data from the entire older adult population, involving all clinical conditions as well as healthy older adults. Subgroup analyses stratified by characteristics of participants (healthy only) and reactive balance outcomes (simulated slip or trip while walking, simulated forward falls, being pushed or pulled, and movable platform) were also conducted.
Thirty-nine RCTs ( = 1388) investigating 17 different types of exercise interventions were included in the network meta-analysis. Reactive balance training as a single intervention presented the highest probability (surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) score) of being the best intervention for improving reactive balance and the greatest relative effects vs. NE in the entire sample involving all clinical conditions [SUCRA = 0.9; mean difference (95% Credible Interval): 2.7 (1.0 to 4.3)]. The results were not affected by characteristics of participants (i.e., healthy older adults only) or reactive balance outcomes.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The findings from the NMA suggest that a task-specific reactive balance exercise could be the optimal intervention for improving reactive balance in older adults, and power training can be considered as a secondary training exercise.
反应性平衡是身体失去稳定性时防止跌倒的最后一道防线,并且已有报道各种基于运动的干预措施对老年人反应性平衡具有有益影响。然而,关于它们相对效果的汇总证据尚未得到描述。
回顾和评估各种基于运动的干预措施对老年人反应性平衡的比较效果。
从数据库建立至2021年8月检索了九个电子数据库和参考文献列表。根据PICOS标准的纳入标准如下:(1)研究对象:平均年龄65岁及以上的老年人;(2)干预和对照:每项试验中至少比较两种不同的运动干预措施或一种运动干预措施与无运动对照干预(NE);(3)结局:至少一项反应性平衡测量指标;(4)研究类型:随机对照试验。对来自所有老年人总体的数据进行主要的网状Meta分析,包括所有临床情况以及健康老年人。还进行了按参与者特征(仅健康者)和反应性平衡结局(行走时模拟滑倒或绊倒、模拟向前跌倒、被推或拉以及可移动平台)分层的亚组分析。
网状Meta分析纳入了39项随机对照试验(n = 1388),研究了17种不同类型的运动干预措施。在涉及所有临床情况的整个样本中,反应性平衡训练作为单一干预措施是改善反应性平衡的最佳干预措施的概率最高(累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)评分),并且相对于NE具有最大的相对效果[SUCRA = 0.9;平均差(95%可信区间):2.7(1.0至4.3)]。结果不受参与者特征(即仅健康老年人)或反应性平衡结局的影响。
总结/结论:网状Meta分析的结果表明,特定任务的反应性平衡运动可能是改善老年人反应性平衡的最佳干预措施,力量训练可被视为次要的训练运动。