Grubba Rafał, Kaniewska Kinga, Ponikiewski Łukasz, Cristóvão Beata, Ferenc Wiesława, Dragulescu-Andrasi Alina, Krzystek J, Stoian Sebastian A, Pikies Jerzy
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Faculty, Gdańsk University of Technology , G. Narutowicza St. 11/12, Gdańsk PL-80-233, Poland.
Department of General and Coordination Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University , Maria Curie-Skłodowska Sq. 2, Lublin PL-20-031, Poland.
Inorg Chem. 2017 Sep 18;56(18):11030-11042. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01374. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
This work describes a series of iron(II) phosphanylphosphido complexes. These compounds were obtained by reacting lithiated diphosphanes RPP(SiMe)Li (R = t-Bu, i-Pr) with an iron(II) β-diketiminate complex, [LFe(μ-Cl)Li(DME)] (1), where DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane and L = Dippnacnac (β-diketiminate). While the reaction of 1 with t-BuPP(SiMe)Li yields [LFe(η-MeSiPP-t-Bu)] (2), that of 1 with equimolar amounts of i-PrPP(SiMe)Li, in DME, leads to [LFe(η-i-PrPPSiMe)] (3). In contrast, the reaction of 1 with (i-PrN)PP(SiMe)Li provides not an iron-containing complex but 1-[(diisopropylamino)phosphine]-2,4-bis(diisopropylamino)-3-(trimethylsilyl)tetraphosphetane (4). The structures of 2-4 were determined using diffractometry. Thus, 2 exhibits a three-coordinate iron site and 3 a four-coordinate iron site. The increase in the coordination number is induced by the change from an anticlinal to a synclinal conformation of the phoshpanylphosphido ligands. The electronic structures of 2 and 3 were assessed through a combined field-dependent Fe Mössbauer and high-frequency and -field electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic investigation in conjunction with analysis of their magnetic susceptibility and magnetization data. These studies revealed two high-spin iron(II) sites with S = 2 ground states that have different properties. While 2 exhibits a zero-field splitting described by a positive D parameter (D = +17.4 cm; E/D = 0.11) for 3, this parameter is negative [D = -25(5) cm; E/D = 0.15(5)]. Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations provide insights into the origin of these differences and allow us to rationalize the fine and hyperfine structure parameters of 2 and 3. Thus, for 2, the spin-orbit coupling mixes a z-type ground state with two low-lying {xz/yz} orbital states. These interactions lead to an easy plane of magnetization, which is essentially parallel to the plane defined by the N-Fe-N atoms. For 3, we find a yz-type ground state that is strongly mixed with a low-lying z-type orbital state. In this case, the spin-orbit interaction leads to a partial unquenching of the orbital momentum along the x axis, that is, to an easy axis of magnetization oriented roughly along the Fe-P bond of the phosphido moiety.
这项工作描述了一系列磷亚膦酸铁(II)配合物。这些化合物是通过使锂化的二膦RPP(SiMe)Li(R = t-Bu,i-Pr)与铁(II)β-二酮亚胺配合物[LFe(μ-Cl)Li(DME)](1)反应得到的,其中DME = 1,2-二甲氧基乙烷,L = Dippnacnac(β-二酮亚胺)。虽然1与t-BuPP(SiMe)Li反应生成[LFe(η-MeSiPP-t-Bu)](2),但1在DME中与等摩尔量的i-PrPP(SiMe)Li反应则生成[LFe(η-i-PrPPSiMe)](3)。相比之下,1与(i-PrN)PP(SiMe)Li反应得到的不是含铁配合物,而是1-[(二异丙基氨基)膦]-2,4-双(二异丙基氨基)-3-(三甲基甲硅烷基)四磷杂环丁烷(4)。通过衍射测定法确定了2 - 4的结构。因此,2呈现三配位铁位点,3呈现四配位铁位点。配位数的增加是由磷亚膦酸配体从反式构象变为顺式构象引起的。通过结合场依赖的Fe穆斯堡尔谱、高频和高场电子顺磁共振光谱研究以及对它们的磁化率和磁化数据的分析,评估了2和3的电子结构。这些研究揭示了两个具有S = 2基态的高自旋铁(II)位点,它们具有不同的性质。虽然2表现出由正D参数(D = +17.4 cm;E/D = 0.11)描述的零场分裂,但对于3,该参数为负[D = -25(5) cm;E/D = 0.15(5)]。密度泛函理论(DFT)和含时密度泛函理论(TDDFT)计算为这些差异的起源提供了见解,并使我们能够合理化2和3的精细和超精细结构参数。因此,对于2,自旋轨道耦合将z型基态与两个低能的{xz/yz}轨道态混合。这些相互作用导致一个易于磁化的平面,该平面基本上平行于由N-Fe-N原子定义的平面。对于3,我们发现一个yz型基态与一个低能的z型轨道态强烈混合。在这种情况下,自旋轨道相互作用导致沿x轴的轨道动量部分未被淬灭,即导致一个大致沿磷酰基部分的Fe-P键取向的易于磁化轴。