Jo Young-Hoon, Park Ki-Chul, Song Young-Sik, Sung Il-Hoon
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicie, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153 Kyoungchun-ro, Guri-si, Gyeonggi-do, 11923, Republic of Korea.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 25;18(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1729-4.
Clinical and radiological outcomes including fixation stability of osteotomy site were compared in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who underwent modified Ludloff osteotomy to correct hallux valgus with osteotomy site fixation using two screws versus those who underwent additional fixation using a plate.
The fixation technique performed with two screws was used to fix the osteotomy sites following modified Ludloff osteotomy in 15 patients (15 feet, Group S), while the augmented plate fixation technique was used in 14 patients (16 feet, Group P). Surgical outcomes were analysed using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and radiologic parameters measured before surgery and during follow-up examinations. To evaluate the stability of each osteotomy site fixation technique, the 1-2 inter-metatarsal angle (IMA) and angle of the altered margin of the lateral cortex (AMLC) were measured immediately and 6 weeks after surgery, and variations in the angles were compared. In addition, bone mineral density (BMD) values were compared between patients with correction loss at the osteotomy site and those with no loss of correction.
No significant differences between groups were found for total AOFAS scores before surgery and at the final follow-up. However, significant differences were observed in the 1-2 IMA, beginning at 6 weeks postoperatively and continuing through the final follow-up. The 1-2 IMA and angle of AMLC measured immediately after and 6 weeks after surgery showed significantly greater variation in Group S than in Group P. In Group S, patients with correction loss (5 feet) at osteotomy site showed significantly lower BMD values than those with no loss of correction (10 feet). Despite the lower BMD values of patients in Group P than in Group S, a loss of correction did not occur in these patients.
Correction loss occurred at the osteotomy site within 6 weeks postoperatively in patients who underwent fixation using only the two-screw fixation technique following modified Ludloff osteotomy; such loss could be reduced using the augmented plate fixation technique even in patients with osteoporosis.
对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者进行改良Ludloff截骨术矫正拇外翻,比较采用两枚螺钉固定截骨部位与采用钢板额外固定的患者的临床和影像学结果,包括截骨部位的固定稳定性。
15例患者(15足,S组)采用改良Ludloff截骨术后用两枚螺钉固定截骨部位,14例患者(16足,P组)采用增强钢板固定技术。采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分分析手术结果,并在术前和随访检查时测量影像学参数。为评估每种截骨部位固定技术的稳定性,在术后即刻和6周测量第1-2跖骨间角(IMA)和外侧皮质改变边缘角(AMLC),并比较角度变化。此外,比较截骨部位有矫正丢失的患者和无矫正丢失的患者的骨密度(BMD)值。
术前和最终随访时两组的AOFAS总分无显著差异。然而,术后6周开始直至最终随访,1-2 IMA存在显著差异。术后即刻和6周测量的1-2 IMA和AMLC在S组的变化显著大于P组。在S组,截骨部位有矫正丢失(5足)的患者的BMD值显著低于无矫正丢失(10足)的患者。尽管P组患者的BMD值低于S组,但这些患者未发生矫正丢失。
改良Ludloff截骨术后仅采用两枚螺钉固定技术的患者在术后6周内截骨部位发生了矫正丢失;即使是骨质疏松患者,采用增强钢板固定技术也可减少这种丢失。