Parrell Benjamin, Agnew Zarinah, Nagarajan Srikantan, Houde John, Ivry Richard B
Department of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716,
Department of Psychology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, and.
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;37(38):9249-9258. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3363-16.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
The cerebellum has been hypothesized to form a crucial part of the speech motor control network. Evidence for this comes from patients with cerebellar damage, who exhibit a variety of speech deficits, as well as imaging studies showing cerebellar activation during speech production in healthy individuals. To date, the precise role of the cerebellum in speech motor control remains unclear, as it has been implicated in both anticipatory (feedforward) and reactive (feedback) control. Here, we assess both anticipatory and reactive aspects of speech motor control, comparing the performance of patients with cerebellar degeneration and matched controls. Experiment 1 tested feedforward control by examining speech adaptation across trials in response to a consistent perturbation of auditory feedback. Experiment 2 tested feedback control, examining online corrections in response to inconsistent perturbations of auditory feedback. Both male and female patients and controls were tested. The patients were impaired in adapting their feedforward control system relative to controls, exhibiting an attenuated anticipatory response to the perturbation. In contrast, the patients produced even larger compensatory responses than controls, suggesting an increased reliance on sensory feedback to guide speech articulation in this population. Together, these results suggest that the cerebellum is crucial for maintaining accurate feedforward control of speech, but relatively uninvolved in feedback control. Speech motor control is a complex activity that is thought to rely on both predictive, feedforward control as well as reactive, feedback control. While the cerebellum has been shown to be part of the speech motor control network, its functional contribution to feedback and feedforward control remains controversial. Here, we use real-time auditory perturbations of speech to show that patients with cerebellar degeneration are impaired in adapting feedforward control of speech but retain the ability to make online feedback corrections; indeed, the patients show an increased sensitivity to feedback. These results indicate that the cerebellum forms a crucial part of the feedforward control system for speech but is not essential for online, feedback control.
小脑被认为是言语运动控制网络的关键组成部分。这一观点的证据来自小脑损伤患者,他们表现出各种言语缺陷,以及成像研究表明健康个体在言语产生过程中小脑会被激活。迄今为止,小脑在言语运动控制中的确切作用仍不清楚,因为它既涉及预期(前馈)控制,也涉及反应性(反馈)控制。在此,我们评估言语运动控制的预期和反应两个方面,比较小脑变性患者和匹配对照组的表现。实验1通过检查在一系列试验中对听觉反馈的持续扰动的言语适应性来测试前馈控制。实验2测试反馈控制,检查对听觉反馈不一致扰动的在线校正。对男性和女性患者及对照组都进行了测试。与对照组相比,患者在前馈控制系统的适应性方面受损,对扰动的预期反应减弱。相反,患者产生的补偿反应比对照组更大,这表明该群体在引导言语发音时对感觉反馈的依赖增加。总之,这些结果表明小脑对于维持准确的言语前馈控制至关重要,但相对而言与反馈控制无关。言语运动控制是一项复杂的活动,被认为既依赖于预测性的前馈控制,也依赖于反应性的反馈控制。虽然小脑已被证明是言语运动控制网络的一部分,但其对反馈和前馈控制的功能贡献仍存在争议。在此,我们利用言语的实时听觉扰动表明,小脑变性患者在言语前馈控制的适应性方面受损,但仍保留进行在线反馈校正的能力;事实上,患者对反馈表现出更高的敏感性。这些结果表明,小脑是言语前馈控制系统的关键组成部分,但对于在线反馈控制并非必不可少。