Karlin Robin, Tesch Emily, Tang Ding-Lan, Zeng Yuyu, Niziolek Caroline A, Parrell Benjamin
Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
J Neurophysiol. 2025 May 1;133(5):1382-1391. doi: 10.1152/jn.00605.2024. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
Sensory feedback is crucial for accurate motor control. One process of movement correction is sensorimotor adaptation, or motor learning in response to perceived sensory errors. Recent studies demonstrate that people can adapt to opposing errors on a single movement given a context that differentiates when each error occurs. In speech production, linguistic structure (e.g., the same vowel in different words) can provide context for differential adaptation, but it is unclear whether this is restricted to the same effectors (i.e., lips, tongue, jaw) or also includes movements of other speech effectors (i.e., the larynx). Reaching studies show that contextual movements need not be produced with the same effector as the learning target, but so far, they have only tested left-right pairs. We present three simultaneous adaptation experiments in speech that examine whether laryngeal movements for pitch can provide context for oral articulator movements for vowels. In each experiment, the resonances that correlate with vowel articulator position were perturbed in three directions that were predictable given a pitch context. First, Mandarin speakers differentially adapted given pitch contexts that signal differences in word meaning, suggesting that lexical pitch provides context for vowels. Second, English speakers differentially adapted given arbitrary pitch matching contexts on the word "head," suggesting that nonmeaningful pitch movements provide context for vowels. Third, English speakers did not differentially adapt when listening to contextual pitch, indicating that mere auditory input of pitch is insufficient. Together, these results suggest that sensorimotor context for learning can be provided by effectors other than the learning target. Previous work shows that sensorimotor learning can be specific to different motor contexts, but to date, this research has only examined contexts provided by the same effector as the learning target or its contralateral pair. We show that laryngeal movements for pitch enable differentiated learning of oral articulator movements for vowels, even when the pitch is linguistically meaningless. This indicates that motor contexts that enable learning can be generated by effectors distinct from those that undergo learning.
感觉反馈对于精确的运动控制至关重要。运动校正的一个过程是感觉运动适应,即根据感知到的感觉误差进行运动学习。最近的研究表明,在给定区分每个误差何时发生的情境下,人们可以在单个运动中适应相反的误差。在言语产生中,语言结构(例如,不同单词中的相同元音)可以为差异适应提供情境,但尚不清楚这是否仅限于相同的效应器(即嘴唇、舌头、下巴),还是也包括其他言语效应器(即喉部)的运动。伸手研究表明,情境运动不一定与学习目标使用相同的效应器来产生,但到目前为止,他们只测试了左右对。我们进行了三项同时进行的言语适应实验,以研究音高的喉部运动是否可以为元音的口腔发音器运动提供情境。在每个实验中,与元音发音器位置相关的共振在三个方向上受到扰动,这些方向在给定音高情境下是可预测的。首先,说普通话的人在表示词义差异的音高情境下进行差异适应,这表明词汇音高为元音提供了情境。其次,说英语的人在单词“head”上给定任意音高匹配情境时进行差异适应,这表明无意义的音高运动为元音提供了情境。第三,说英语的人在听情境音高时没有进行差异适应,这表明仅仅是音高的听觉输入是不够的。总之,这些结果表明,学习的感觉运动情境可以由学习目标以外的效应器提供。先前的研究表明,感觉运动学习可以特定于不同的运动情境,但迄今为止,这项研究只考察了由与学习目标相同的效应器或其对侧效应器提供的情境。我们表明,即使音高在语言上没有意义,音高的喉部运动也能使元音的口腔发音器运动进行差异学习。这表明能够实现学习的运动情境可以由与进行学习的效应器不同的效应器产生。