• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Surgical volume and conversion rate in laparoscopic hysterectomy: does volume matter? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术量和转化率:量重要吗?一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):1021-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5780-x. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术中转率及其评估的临床意义。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.006.
3
Risk Factors and Outcomes for Conversion to Laparotomy of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecology.良性妇科腹腔镜子宫切除术中转开腹的危险因素和结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1295-1305. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001743.
4
Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.手术趋势和子宫切除术手术类型的时间框架比较:一项全国范围内基于人群的 15 年研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):65-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Innovations in surgery: the role of residents in the implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy.外科手术中的创新:住院医师在腹腔镜子宫切除术实施中的作用。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Sep;21(7):615-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0443. Epub 2011 May 25.
6
Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.妇科医生特征与行腹腔镜辅助子宫切除术可能性的关联:一项全国基于人群的研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Apr;161(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.12.024. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
7
Does surgical volume influence short-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy?手术量是否会影响腹腔镜子宫切除术的短期结局?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):24.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.070. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
8
Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.微创子宫切除术——对执业妇科医生态度和障碍的调查。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.017.
9
Trends in the implementation of advanced minimally invasive gynecologic surgical procedures in the Netherlands.荷兰先进微创妇科手术的实施趋势。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May-Jun;22(4):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
The laparoscopic approach is more preferred among nurses for benign gynecologic conditions than among nonmedical working women: A nationwide study in Taiwan.在台湾的一项全国性研究中,对于良性妇科疾病,护士比非医疗职业女性更倾向于选择腹腔镜手术方式。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;55(2):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: An Analysis of Complications, Management Techniques, and Lessons Learned From Our Clinical Experience.优化腹腔镜子宫切除术的治疗效果:并发症分析、管理技巧及临床经验总结
Cureus. 2025 May 7;17(5):e83636. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83636. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Conversion to laparotomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and key risk factors.腹腔镜子宫切除术中转为开腹手术:患病率及关键危险因素的荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2025 May 6;12:1522022. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1522022. eCollection 2025.
3
Predictive factors for conversion to laparotomy in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. A re-evaluation of clinicopathological factors in the era of minimally invasive gynaecology.接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性中转开腹手术的预测因素。微创妇科时代临床病理因素的重新评估。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Jun;16(2):185-193. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.2.020.
4
Exploring robotic total hysterectomies: a multi-site experience with the Senhance Surgical System.探索机器人全子宫切除术:Senhance 手术系统的多中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 26;18(1):268. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01944-4.
5
Evaluation of the effect of previous endometriosis surgery on clinical and surgical outcomes of subsequent endometriosis surgery.评估既往子宫内膜异位症手术对后续子宫内膜异位症手术临床和手术结局的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;308(5):1531-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07193-4. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
Multi-Institutional Trends in Gynecological Robotic Surgery in India: A Real-World Scenario.印度妇科机器人手术的多机构趋势:真实世界情况
Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36564. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36564. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Surgical outcome predictor analysis following hand-assisted or pure laparoscopic transperitoneal nephroureterectomy using the Taiwan upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma database.使用台湾上尿路尿路上皮癌数据库对手助或单纯腹腔镜经腹肾输尿管切除术的手术结果预测因素分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 1;9:934355. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.934355. eCollection 2022.
8
Implementation of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy As the Default Technique and Lessons Learnt.将全腹腔镜子宫切除术作为默认技术的实施及经验教训
Cureus. 2021 Jul 16;13(7):e16428. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16428. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Economic evaluation of different routes of surgery for the management of endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.不同手术路径治疗子宫内膜癌的经济学评价:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e045888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045888.

本文引用的文献

1
A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes.一种用于测量腹腔镜子宫切除术手术结果的动态质量评估工具。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):754.e1-754.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
2
Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低年资与高年资妇科手术医师手术结局的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.048. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
3
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
4
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy.外科医生手术量对子宫切除术围手术期结局的影响。
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):174-81. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13753907291594.
5
Annual case volume has no impact on patient outcomes in laparoscopic partial colectomy.每年的病例数量对腹腔镜部分结肠切除术的患者预后没有影响。
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1648-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3365-x. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
6
Achieving consensus on the definition of conversion to laparotomy: a Delphi study among general surgeons, gynecologists, and urologists.达成剖腹手术转换定义共识:普通外科医生、妇科医生和泌尿科医生之间的德尔菲研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4631-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3086-1. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
7
Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review.腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜癌:系统评价。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):413-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
8
Hysterectomy surgery trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade?子宫切除术手术趋势:对过去十年的更准确描述?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;208(4):277.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
9
Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术中转率及其评估的临床意义。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.006.
10
Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹手术在子宫内膜癌分期中的安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术量和转化率:量重要吗?一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

Surgical volume and conversion rate in laparoscopic hysterectomy: does volume matter? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):1021-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5780-x. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5780-x
PMID:28842767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5772131/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was conducted in the Netherlands. The aim was to evaluate whether surgical volume of laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) performed by proven skilled gynecologists had an impact on the conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy.

METHODS

In 14 hospitals, all LHs performed by 19 proven skilled gynecologists between 2007 and 2010 were included in the analysis. Surgical volume, conversion rate and type of conversion (reactive or strategic) were retrospectively assessed. To estimate the impact of surgical volume on the conversion rate, logistic regressions were performed. These regressions were adjusted for patient's age, Body Mass Index (BMI), ASA classification, previous abdominal surgery and the indication (malignant versus benign) for the LH.

RESULTS

During the study period, 19 proven skilled gynecologists performed a total of 1051 LHs. Forty percent of the gynecologists performed over 20 LHs per year (median 17.3, range 5.4-49.5). Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 5.0% of all LHs (53 of 1051); 38 (3.6%) were strategic and 15 (1.4%) were reactive conversions. Performing over 20 LHs per year was significantly associated with a lower overall conversion rate (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.77), a lower strategic conversion rate (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.65), but not with a lower reactive conversion rate (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.33-2.79).

CONCLUSION

A higher annual surgical volume of LHs by proven skilled gynecologists is inversely related to the conversion rate to laparotomy, and results in a lower strategic conversion rate.

摘要

背景

一项多中心、回顾性、队列研究在荷兰进行。目的是评估由经验丰富的妇科医生进行的腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)的手术量是否会影响腹腔镜到剖腹手术的转化率。

方法

在 14 家医院中,分析了 2007 年至 2010 年间由 19 名经验丰富的妇科医生进行的所有 LH。回顾性评估手术量、转化率和转换类型(反应性或策略性)。为了估计手术量对转化率的影响,进行了逻辑回归。这些回归调整了患者的年龄、体重指数(BMI)、ASA 分类、先前的腹部手术以及 LH 的适应证(恶性与良性)。

结果

在研究期间,19 名经验丰富的妇科医生共进行了 1051 例 LH。40%的妇科医生每年进行超过 20 例 LH(中位数为 17.3,范围为 5.4-49.5)。所有 LH 中有 5.0%(53/1051)转为剖腹手术;38 例(3.6%)为策略性转换,15 例(1.4%)为反应性转换。每年进行超过 20 例 LH 与整体转化率较低显著相关(OR 0.43,95%CI 0.24-0.77),策略性转化率较低(OR 0.32,95%CI 0.16-0.65),但与反应性转化率较低无关(OR 0.96,95%CI 0.33-2.79)。

结论

由经验丰富的妇科医生进行的 LH 每年手术量较高与转化为剖腹手术的比率呈反比,并且导致策略性转化比率降低。