• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第八版 AJCC 膀胱癌新亚分期在不同分期环境下的验证。

Validation of the Eighth AJCC New Substages for Bladder Cancer Among Different Staging Contexts.

机构信息

Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):e1095-e1106. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2017.07.025
PMID:28843376
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To validate the prognostic value of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (eighth edition) among different staging contexts (clinical vs. pathologic).

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2014) was accessed through SEER*Stat program and both AJCC seventh and eighth edition stages were assigned for each patient. Overall and cancer-specific survival analyses according to both editions were conducted through Kaplan-Meier analysis. Concordance index (c-index) was assessed for each edition.

RESULTS

A total of 7074 patients with pathologically staged and 26,698 with clinically staged urinary bladder carcinoma were identified in the period from 2010 to 2014. Among patients with pathologically staged disease without neoadjuvant treatment, P values for all pairwise comparisons among different stages (according to AJCC seventh and eighth systems) were significant for both overall and cancer-specific survivals (< .01). Moreover, within the same cohort, c-index (using death from urinary bladder cancer as the dependent variable) for AJCC seventh system was 0.714 (SE 0.008; 95% CI, 0.699-0.729); whereas the c-index for the AJCC eighth system was 0.718 (SE 0.008; 95% CI, 0.702-0.733). Likewise, among patients with clinically staged disease, P values for all pairwise comparisons among different AJCC eighth stages were significant for overall survival (< .05) except for stage IIIA versus stage IIIB; whereas P values for all pairwise comparisons among different AJCC eighth stages were significant for cancer-specific survival (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

This analysis supports the prognostic relevance of the added substages described within AJCC eighth edition stages III and IV for clinically staged and pathologically staged disease without neoadjuvant treatment.

摘要

目的

验证新的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统(第八版)在不同分期环境(临床与病理)中的预后价值。

方法

通过 SEER*Stat 程序访问监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2010-2014 年),并为每位患者分配 AJCC 第七和第八版分期。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析对两个版本的总生存和癌症特异性生存进行分析。评估每个版本的一致性指数(c-index)。

结果

在 2010 年至 2014 年期间,共确定了 7074 例经病理分期和 26698 例经临床分期的膀胱癌患者。在未经新辅助治疗的病理分期疾病患者中,AJCC 第七和第八系统不同分期之间的所有两两比较的 P 值均为总生存和癌症特异性生存(<0.01)。此外,在同一队列中,AJCC 第七版系统的 c-index(以膀胱癌死亡为因变量)为 0.714(SE 0.008;95%CI,0.699-0.729);而 AJCC 第八版系统的 c-index 为 0.718(SE 0.008;95%CI,0.702-0.733)。同样,在临床分期疾病患者中,除 IIIA 期与 IIIB 期外,AJCC 第八版不同分期之间的所有两两比较的 P 值均为总生存(<0.05);而 AJCC 第八版不同分期之间的所有两两比较的 P 值均为癌症特异性生存(P<0.05)。

结论

这项分析支持 AJCC 第八版中 III 期和 IV 期描述的附加亚期对未经新辅助治疗的临床分期和病理分期疾病的预后相关性。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Eighth AJCC New Substages for Bladder Cancer Among Different Staging Contexts.第八版 AJCC 膀胱癌新亚分期在不同分期环境下的验证。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):e1095-e1106. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
2
Validation of the 8th AJCC staging system for gastric cancer in a population-based setting.基于人群的胃癌第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统的验证。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;12(5):525-530. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1413348. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
3
Validation of the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma initially receiving chemoradiotherapy and proposal of modifications.验证第八版 AJCC 分期系统在最初接受放化疗的胰腺腺癌患者中的应用,并提出修改建议。
Cancer Biol Med. 2020 May 15;17(2):492-500. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0101.
4
Assessment of the prognostic value of the 8th AJCC staging system for patients with clinically staged prostate cancer; A time to sub-classify stage IV?评估第8版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统对临床分期前列腺癌患者的预后价值;是时候对IV期进行细分了吗?
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188450. eCollection 2017.
5
Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?评估第 8 版 AJCC 病理分期与临床分期系统在胰腺腺癌中的应用:是否需要重新审视这一传统观点?
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018 Feb;17(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Challenging a dogma; AJCC 8th staging system is not sufficient to predict outcomes of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.挑战传统观念;第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统不足以预测恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的预后。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;113:128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Validation of the eighth clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer stage grouping for esophageal cancer.第八版美国癌症联合委员会食管癌临床分期分组的验证。
Future Oncol. 2018 Jan;14(1):65-75. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0376. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Projecting Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging Systems in Two Contemporary National Patient Cohorts.预测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的生存情况:在两个当代国家患者队列中比较第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联合会分期系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Nov;27(11):1408-1416. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0306. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer.AJCC 第 8 版肺癌分期系统在小细胞肺癌患者中的验证。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Apr;20(4):550-556. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1739-6. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
10
Assessment of the external validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for anal carcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会第八版肛管癌分期系统的外部效度评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 May;34(5):923-929. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1441817. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A nomogram integrating mutation signatures and clinical features for prognostic stratification in bladder cancer.一种整合突变特征和临床特征用于膀胱癌预后分层的列线图。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Aug 15;16(1):1562. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03338-w.
2
Development and Validation of a Competitive Risk Model in Elderly Patients with Transitional Cell Bladder Carcinoma.老年移行细胞膀胱癌患者竞争风险模型的建立与验证
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jan 29;31:e946332. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946332.
3
Racial disparities in stage at bladder cancer diagnosis in the US Veterans Affairs healthcare system.
美国退伍军人事务医疗体系中膀胱癌诊断时的种族差异。
BJU Int. 2024 Sep;134(3):473-483. doi: 10.1111/bju.16380. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives.上尿路尿路上皮癌的淋巴结清扫术:现状与未来展望。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1327-1344. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
5
Pathologic collision of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma with small cell carcinoma: a case report.膀胱尿路上皮癌合并小细胞癌的病理性碰撞:一例报告。
Diagn Pathol. 2023 Jul 11;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13000-023-01369-x.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Prognosis Analysis of Younger Bladder Cancer Patients.年轻膀胱癌患者的临床结局和预后分析。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jan 28;29(2):578-588. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020052.
7
Can American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic groups be individualized in patients undergoing surgery for Stage IV invasive upper tract Urothelial Carcinoma?美国癌症联合委员会的预后分组能否在接受手术治疗的IV期浸润性上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中实现个体化?
J Cancer. 2021 Feb 2;12(7):2023-2029. doi: 10.7150/jca.50417. eCollection 2021.
8
Bladder cancer survival nomogram: Development and validation of a prediction tool, using the SEER and TCGA databases.膀胱癌生存列线图:利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库及癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库开发并验证一种预测工具
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17725. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017725.