Suppr超能文献

压电与传统技术在正颌手术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Piezoelectric versus conventional techniques for orthognathic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Sergipe, Brazil.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;45(10):1607-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of complications after orthognathic surgery comparing piezo-surgery with conventional osteotomy.

METHODS

We conducted this study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Lilacs, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and OpenThesis to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs and nRCTs, respectively) comparing patient outcomes (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative swelling, pain, neurosensitivity) after orthognathic surgery by piezoelectric or conventional osteotomy. We pooled individual results of continuous and dichotomous outcome data using the mean difference (MD) and risk difference (RD) with the 95% confidence interval, respectively.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and five nRCTs were selected. No difference in operative time was observed between piezo-surgery and conventional osteotomies. We found a decrease of intraoperative blood loss with piezo-surgery (MD -128 mL; P < 0.001) and a pooled difference in severe blood loss of 35% (P = 0.008) favouring piezo-surgery. Based on pooled individual results of studies evaluating neurosensitivity by clinical neurosensory testing, our meta-analysis showed a pooled difference in severe nerve disturbance of 25% (P < 0.0001) favouring piezo-surgery. Test for subgroup differences (I2 = 26.6%) indicated that follow-up time may have an effect on neurosensory disturbance. We found differences between piezo-surgery and conventional osteotomy at 3 months (RD 28%; P < 0.001) and 6 months (RD 15%; P = 0.001) after surgery. Meta-analyses for pain and swelling were not performed because of a lack of sufficient studies.

CONCLUSION

Currently available evidence suggests that piezo-surgery has favorable effects on complications associated with orthognathic surgery, including reductions in intraoperative blood loss and severe nerve disturbance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对使用超声骨刀与传统截骨术行正颌手术后的并发症进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。

方法

我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了这项研究。我们对 PubMed、Scopus、Science Direct、Lilacs、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Google Scholar 和 OpenThesis 进行了系统检索,以确定比较超声骨刀法与传统截骨术治疗正颌手术后患者结局(手术时间、术中失血量、术后肿胀、疼痛、神经感觉)的随机和非随机对照试验(RCT 和 nRCT)。我们分别使用均数差值(MD)和风险差(RD)及其 95%置信区间对连续和二分类结局数据的个体结果进行汇总。

结果

纳入了 3 项 RCT 和 5 项 nRCT。超声骨刀法与传统截骨术的手术时间无差异。我们发现超声骨刀法可减少术中失血量(MD-128mL;P<0.001),且严重出血的 pooled 差异为 35%(P=0.008),有利于超声骨刀法。基于评估临床神经感觉测试的神经感觉的研究的 pooled 个体结果,我们的荟萃分析显示严重神经功能障碍的 pooled 差异为 25%(P<0.0001),有利于超声骨刀法。亚组差异检验(I2=26.6%)表明,随访时间可能对神经感觉障碍有影响。我们发现超声骨刀法与传统截骨术在术后 3 个月(RD 28%;P<0.001)和 6 个月(RD 15%;P=0.001)时存在差异。由于缺乏足够的研究,未进行疼痛和肿胀的荟萃分析。

结论

目前的证据表明,超声骨刀在减少正颌手术后并发症方面具有有利影响,包括术中失血量减少和严重神经损伤减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验