Abdel-Malek Raafat, Abbas Noha, Shohdy Kyrillus S, Ismail Mohamed, Fawzy Radwa, Salem Dalal S, Safwat Ezzat
Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Alainy Center of Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Medicine (NEMROCK), Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo, University, Cairo University Hospitals, Al-Saray St., El-Maniel, 11451 Cairo, Egypt.
Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Alainy Center of Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Medicine (NEMROCK), Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo, University, Cairo University Hospitals, Al-Saray St., El-Maniel, 11451 Cairo, Egypt.
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2017 Sep;29(3):155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jnci.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, such as aprepitant are currently emerging as powerful prophylactic agents for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Therefore, it is important to adjust the anti-emetic regimens based on personal risk factors of the patient, duration of the chemotherapy regimen and cost-effectiveness.
To determine the efficacy of the 3-day aprepitant along with ondansetron and dexamethasone in controlling CINV in patients with large B cell lymphoma receiving multiday-cisplatin regimen chemotherapy.
This is a pilot prospective cross-over trial. Patients were allocated to either aprepitant 125mg on day 1 and 80mg on days 2 & 3 or placebo in the first 2 cycles, with crossover to the opposite treatment in the 3rd and 4th cycles. The primary end point was complete response (CR) of both acute (days 1-5) and delayed (days 6-8) CINV. CR means neither to develop emetic episodes nor to use rescue anti-emetics medication.
Twelve of the 15 patients recruited for the study were fully evaluable and completed 4 cycles of ESHAP regimen with a total of 48 cycles given. In the cycles with aprepitant and those without the CR were 83.3% and 0% respectively (p<0.05). Patients receiving aprepitant in the first 2 cycles recorded less nausea in subsequent cycles that were given without aprepitant. This was not statistically significant.
This triple anti-emetic regimen showed efficacy in controlling the multi-day cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to compare between 3-day and 7-day aprepitant for multi-day cisplatin regimens.
神经激肽-1受体拮抗剂,如阿瑞匹坦,目前正成为化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的强效预防药物。因此,根据患者的个人风险因素、化疗方案的持续时间和成本效益来调整止吐方案很重要。
确定3天阿瑞匹坦联合昂丹司琼和地塞米松在控制接受多日顺铂方案化疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者CINV中的疗效。
这是一项前瞻性交叉试验。在前两个周期中,患者被分配接受第1天125mg、第2天和第3天80mg的阿瑞匹坦或安慰剂,在第3和第4周期交叉接受相反的治疗。主要终点是急性(第1 - 5天)和延迟性(第6 - 8天)CINV的完全缓解(CR)。CR是指既不发生呕吐发作也不使用急救止吐药物。
招募进行该研究的15名患者中有12名可进行全面评估,并完成了4个周期的ESHAP方案,共进行了48个周期。使用阿瑞匹坦的周期和未使用阿瑞匹坦的周期的CR率分别为83.3%和0%(p<0.05)。在前两个周期接受阿瑞匹坦治疗的患者在随后未使用阿瑞匹坦的周期中恶心症状较少。这在统计学上无显著意义。
这种三联止吐方案在控制多日顺铂引起的恶心和呕吐方面显示出疗效。需要进一步的随机对照试验来比较多日顺铂方案中3天和7天阿瑞匹坦的疗效。