乳腺癌手术应在门诊进行吗?:服务提供者视角下的卫生经济学
Should Breast Cancer Surgery Be Done in an Outpatient Setting?: Health Economics From the Perspective of Service Providers.
作者信息
Formago Margaret, Schrauder Michael G, Rauh Claudia, Hack Carolin C, Jud Sebastian M, Hildebrandt Thomas, Schulz-Wendtland Rüdiger, Frentz S, Graubert S, Beckmann Matthias W, Lux Michael P
机构信息
Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
出版信息
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Aug;77(8):879-886. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-114427. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
INTRODUCTION
The care of patients with breast cancer is extremely complex and requires interdisciplinary care in certified facilities. These specialized facilities provide numerous services without being correspondingly remunerated. The question whether breast cancer surgery should be performed in an outpatient setting to reduce costs is increasingly being debated. This study compares inpatient surgical treatment with a model of the same surgery performed on an outpatient basis to examine the potential financial impact.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A theoretical model was developed and the DRG fees for surgical interventions to treat primary breast cancer were calculated. A theoretical 1-day DRG was then calculated to permit comparisons with outpatient procedures. The costs of outpatient surgery were calculated based on the remuneration rates of the AOP (Outpatient Surgery) Contract and the EBM (Uniform Assessment Scale) and compared to the costs of the 1-day DRG.
RESULTS
The DRG fee for both breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy is higher than the fee paid in the context of the EBM system, although the same procedures were carried out in both systems. If a hospital were to carry out breast-conserving surgery as an outpatient procedure, the fee would be € 1313.81; depending on the type of surgery, the hospital would therefore only receive between 39.20% and 52.82% of the DRG fee. This was the case even for a 1-day treatment. Compared to the real DRG fees the difference would be even more striking.
CONCLUSION
Carrying out breast cancer surgery as an outpatient procedure would result in a significant shortfall of revenues. Additional services from certified centers, such as the interdisciplinary planning of treatment, psycho-oncological and social-medical care with the involvement of relatives, detailed documentation, etc., which are currently provided without surcharge or adequate remuneration, could no longer be maintained. The quality of processes and excellent results which have been achieved and ultimately the care given by certified facilities would be significantly at risk.
引言
乳腺癌患者的护理极其复杂,需要在经过认证的机构中进行跨学科护理。这些专业机构提供了众多服务,但却没有得到相应的报酬。关于是否应在门诊环境中进行乳腺癌手术以降低成本的问题,正引发越来越多的讨论。本研究比较了住院手术治疗与门诊进行相同手术的模式,以检验其潜在的财务影响。
材料与方法
建立了一个理论模型,并计算了治疗原发性乳腺癌手术干预的疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)费用。然后计算了一个理论上的1天DRG,以便与门诊手术进行比较。门诊手术的费用根据门诊手术(AOP)合同和统一评估量表(EBM)的报酬率进行计算,并与1天DRG的费用进行比较。
结果
保乳手术和乳房切除术的DRG费用均高于EBM系统下支付的费用,尽管两个系统进行的是相同的手术。如果医院将保乳手术作为门诊手术进行,费用将为1313.81欧元;因此,根据手术类型,医院只能获得DRG费用的39.20%至52.82%。即使是1天的治疗也是如此。与实际的DRG费用相比,差异会更加显著。
结论
将乳腺癌手术作为门诊手术进行会导致收入大幅短缺。认证中心目前免费或没有获得足够报酬就提供的额外服务,如跨学科治疗规划、亲属参与下的心理肿瘤学和社会医疗护理、详细记录等,将无法继续维持。已取得的流程质量和优异结果,以及认证机构最终提供的护理质量都将面临重大风险。