a Department of Electrical Engineering , National Cheng-Kung University , Tainan , Taiwan.
b School of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology , Chung Shan Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Assist Technol. 2018;30(5):226-232. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1317674. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
This study investigated whether a self-designed assistive listening device (ALD) that incorporates an adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) amplification strategy can surpass a commercially available monaurally worn linear ALD, SM100. Both subjective and objective measurements were implemented. Mandarin Hearing-In-Noise Test (MHINT) scores were the objective measurement, whereas participant satisfaction was the subjective measurement. The comparison was performed in a mixed design (i.e., subjects' hearing status being mild or moderate, quiet versus noisy, and linear versus ADRO scheme). The participants were two groups of hearing-impaired subjects, nine mild and eight moderate, respectively. The results of the ADRO system revealed a significant difference in the MHINT sentence reception threshold (SRT) in noisy environments between monaurally aided and unaided conditions, whereas the linear system did not. The benchmark results showed that the ADRO scheme is effectively beneficial to people who experience mild or moderate hearing loss in noisy environments. The satisfaction rating regarding overall speech quality indicated that the participants were satisfied with the speech quality of both ADRO and linear schemes in quiet environments, and they were more satisfied with ADRO than they with the linear scheme in noisy environments.
本研究旨在探讨一种自主设计的助听设备(ALD),其采用自适应动态范围优化(ADRO)放大策略,是否能超越市售的单耳线性 ALD,SM100。本研究同时采用了主观和客观的测量方法。普通话言语测听测试(MHINT)得分是客观测量,而参与者满意度是主观测量。该比较采用了混合设计(即受试者的听力状况为轻度或中度,安静与嘈杂环境,线性与 ADRO 方案)。参与者是两组听力受损的受试者,分别为 9 名轻度和 8 名中度患者。ADRO 系统的结果显示,在嘈杂环境中单耳助听和未助听条件下的 MHINT 句子接收阈值(SRT)存在显著差异,而线性系统则没有。基准结果表明,ADRO 方案对在嘈杂环境中患有轻度或中度听力损失的人有效有益。关于整体语音质量的满意度评分表明,参与者对安静环境下 ADRO 和线性方案的语音质量均满意,而在嘈杂环境下,他们对 ADRO 的满意度高于对线性方案的满意度。