• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物可降解聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架植入后 5 年的最终结果。

Final five-year outcomes after implantation of biodegradable polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1336-1344. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00434.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00434
PMID:28846543
Abstract

AIMS

Our aim was to report the long-term safety and efficacy of the biodegradable polymer-coated biolimus- eluting Nobori stent compared to the durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting CYPHER stent.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SORT OUT V randomised 2,468 patients 1:1 to the Nobori (n=1,229) versus the CYPHER stent (n=1,239). Clinically driven event detection based on Danish registries was used. The primary endpoint was a composite of safety (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis) and efficacy (target vessel revascularisation). Individual components of the primary endpoint comprise the secondary endpoints. At five-year follow-up, the composite endpoint rate was found to be similar in patients treated with the two study stents (Nobori 182/1,229 [14.8%] vs. CYPHER 197/1,239 [15.8%]; odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.16; p=0.53). The rates of definite stent thrombosis were also found to be similar in patients treated with the two study stents (Nobori 23/1,229 [1.9%] vs. CYPHER 18/1,239 [1.5%]; OR 1.31, 95% CI: 0.70-2.47; p=0.40), as were the other secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

At five-year follow-up, the Nobori stent with a biodegradable polymer coating provided a similar safety and efficacy profile when compared to the durable polymer first-generation CYPHER stent.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告可生物降解聚合物涂层的比马前列素洗脱 Nobori 支架与持久性聚合物涂层的西罗莫司洗脱 Cypher 支架相比的长期安全性和疗效。

方法和结果

SORT OUT V 研究将 2468 例患者按 1:1 随机分为 Nobori 组(n=1229)和 Cypher 组(n=1239)。采用基于丹麦注册中心的临床驱动事件检测。主要终点是安全性(心源性死亡、心肌梗死、明确支架血栓形成)和疗效(靶血管血运重建)的复合终点。主要终点的各个组成部分构成次要终点。在 5 年随访时,两种研究支架治疗的患者复合终点发生率相似(Nobori 组 1229 例中有 182 例[14.8%],Cypher 组 1239 例中有 197 例[15.8%];比值比[OR]0.93,95%CI:0.75-1.16;p=0.53)。两种研究支架治疗的患者明确支架血栓形成发生率也相似(Nobori 组 1229 例中有 23 例[1.9%],Cypher 组 1239 例中有 18 例[1.5%];OR 1.31,95%CI:0.70-2.47;p=0.40),其他次要终点也是如此。

结论

在 5 年随访时,与持久性聚合物第一代 Cypher 支架相比,具有可生物降解聚合物涂层的 Nobori 支架具有相似的安全性和疗效。

相似文献

1
Final five-year outcomes after implantation of biodegradable polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents.生物可降解聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架植入后 5 年的最终结果。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1336-1344. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00434.
2
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
3
Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:来自 COMPARE II 试验的最终 5 年报告(管腔生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1215-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Randomized comparison of the Nobori biolimus A9-eluting stent with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with stenosis in native coronary arteries.随机比较 Nobori 生物可吸收雷帕霉素洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗原发性冠状动脉狭窄患者的疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 1;80(5):789-96. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23280. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
5
Comparison of Durable-Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting and Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the Randomized SORT OUT VI Trial.比较载有雷帕霉素的可降解聚合物涂层与载有紫杉醇的可降解聚合物涂层冠状动脉支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用:随机 SORT OUT VI 试验 3 年的临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
6
Biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer-coated stent versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (SORT OUT V): a randomised non-inferiority trial.无聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的疗效比较:一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61962-X. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
7
Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT VII Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中可生物降解聚合物超薄支柱西罗莫司洗脱支架与可生物降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架的随机对照比较:SORT OUT VII试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003610.
8
A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial.靶向研究 I 试验:新型无内膜凹槽填充型可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的随机比较:临床和血管造影随访结果
EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):75-83. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A12.
9
Five-year outcomes from a trial of three limus-eluting stents with different polymer coatings in patients with coronary artery disease: final results from the ISAR-TEST 4 randomised trial.一项针对冠心病患者使用三种不同聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架的试验的五年结果:ISAR-TEST 4随机试验的最终结果
EuroIntervention. 2016 Mar;11(12):1372-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M11_02.
10
Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.冠状动脉疾病患者中三种不同聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架的十年临床结果研究。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):325-333. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038065.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term (5-Years) Outcomes of Current Drug-Eluting Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中当前药物洗脱支架的长期(5年)疗效:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):1196-1211. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31668. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Everolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers in unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: five-year results of the randomised, non-inferiority SORT OUT VIII trial.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的未选择患者中,依维莫司洗脱支架与含可生物降解聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架对比:随机、非劣效性SORT OUT VIII试验的五年结果
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jun 2;21(11):e629-e638. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00763.
3
Evolution of drug-eluting biomedical implants for sustained drug delivery.药物洗脱生物医学植入物的演变用于持续药物输送。
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2021 Feb;159:21-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
4
CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2018.2018年心血管介入治疗学会(CVIT)关于急性心肌梗死(AMI)的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)专家共识文件。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018 Apr;33(2):178-203. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-0516-y. Epub 2018 Mar 29.