Suppr超能文献

脑磁图揭示了英语句子中意外句法类别错误的不匹配场增强。

Magnetoencephalography Reveals Mismatch Field Enhancement from Unexpected Syntactic Category Errors in English Sentences.

机构信息

Department of English, Seijo University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Children's Learning Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Kanagawa Dental College, Kanagawa, Japan; Department of Electronics and Bioinformatics, Meiji University, Kanagawa, Japan; Department of Electrical Engineering and Bioscience, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jan 1;662:195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.051. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

Abstract

The type of syntactic operations that increase neuronal activation in humans as a result of syntactically erroneous, unexpected lexical items in hearing sentences has remained unclear. In the present study, we used recordings of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity to compare bare infinitive and full infinitive constructions in English. This research aims to identify the type of syntactic deviance that may trigger an early syntax-related mismatch field (MMF) component when unexpected words appear in sentences. Six speakers of English as a first language were presented with auditory stimuli of sentences or words in a passive odd-ball paradigm while watching a silent movie. The experimental protocol included four sessions, specifically investigating the sentential (structural) versions of full (with the 'to' infinitival particle) and bare infinitival structures (without the particle) and the lexical (non-structure) versions of the verb either with or without the particle to determine whether the structure processing of sentences was a more crucial factor in the detection of the MMF than the simple processing of lexical items in verb-only conditions. The amplitude analysis of the resulting evoked fields showed that the presence of the syntactic category error of bare infinitival structures against syntactic predictions evoked a significantly larger MMF activation with a peak latency of approximately 200ms in the anterior superior temporal sulci in the left hemisphere, compared with the lexical items that did not have any syntactic status. These results clearly demonstrate that syntactically unexpected, illegal input in the bare infinitival structure is likely to be noticed more robustly in the brain while processing the structural information of the entire sentence than the corresponding verb-only items.

摘要

由于在听力句子中出现语法错误、意料之外的词汇,导致人类神经元激活的语法操作类型仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们使用脑磁图(MEG)活动记录来比较英语中的bare infinitive 和 full infinitive 结构。本研究旨在确定当句子中出现意外词汇时,可能引发早期与语法相关的失配场(MMF)成分的语法偏差类型。六位以英语为第一语言的说话者在观看无声电影的同时,以被动式奇特球范式接受句子或单词的听觉刺激。实验方案包括四个会话,专门研究完整(带“to”不定式粒子)和 bare infinitival 结构的句子(不带粒子)的结构版本,以及动词的词汇(非结构)版本,带或不带粒子,以确定句子的结构处理是否比简单的动词处理更能在检测 MMF 中作为更关键的因素。得出的诱发场的振幅分析表明,bare infinitival 结构的语法类别错误(与语法预测不符)引起了明显更大的 MMF 激活,在左半球额上前颞回的潜伏期约为 200ms,而词汇项目没有任何语法地位。这些结果清楚地表明,在处理整个句子的结构信息时,bare infinitival 结构中语法上意外的、非法输入比相应的仅动词项目更有可能在大脑中更稳健地被注意到。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验