Schunter Jo Ana, Stöcker Benedikt, Brehler Randolf
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;173(4):233-236. doi: 10.1159/000478700. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
We present the case of a 77-year-old female patient who suffered from severe anaphylaxis during wound care. Allergologic evaluation yielded specific IgE antibodies to chlorhexidine, but anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine was not congruent with the patient history and dermal provocation tests. However, skin prick tests provided evidence for a sensitization to polyhexanide that was further supported by the detection of specific IgE antibodies to polyhexanide, the results of basophil activation tests and IgE inhibition analysis. We presume cross-reactive IgE antibodies binding to both biguanide antiseptics and identified polyhexanide as the likely cause of the anaphylactic reaction. We recognize polyhexanide as an emerging allergen that has to be considered as a cause of anaphylaxis.
我们报告了一例77岁女性患者,她在伤口护理期间发生了严重过敏反应。过敏学评估发现了针对洗必泰的特异性IgE抗体,但洗必泰过敏与患者病史和皮肤激发试验不一致。然而,皮肤点刺试验提供了对聚己缩胍致敏的证据,针对聚己缩胍的特异性IgE抗体检测、嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验结果和IgE抑制分析进一步支持了这一点。我们推测存在与两种双胍类防腐剂结合的交叉反应性IgE抗体,并确定聚己缩胍是过敏反应的可能原因。我们认识到聚己缩胍是一种新出现的变应原,必须将其视为过敏反应的一个原因。