Lai Eric C H, Tang Chung Ngai
Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017 Aug;6(4):222-229. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.21.
The introduction of robotic surgical systems has revolutionized the practice of minimal invasive surgery (MIS). Although little data regarding robotic hepatectomies have been reported, it appears to be similar to conventional laparoscopic approach in terms of blood loss, morbidity rate, mortality rate and hospital stay at least. The application of robotic system in liver surgery was not well evaluated yet, particularly learning curve. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and PubMed databases for articles from January 2001 to May 2016 using the keywords "laparoscopic hepatectomy", "robotic hepatectomy", and "learning curve". With the limited data in robotic hepatectomy, the learning curve model of robotic hepatectomy needs to base on the experience of conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy. Based on the learning curve study experience for laparoscopic hepatectomies, the minimal number laparoscopic minor and major hepatectomies to overcome learning curve are 22-64 cases, and 45-75 cases, respectively. Left lateral sectionectomy technique is more standardized, and it is a good start for training of MIS liver surgery. However, the training program required for the robotic liver surgeons still highly depends on the surgeons' experience of previous open and laparoscopic liver surgery, the surgeons' previous experience of other robotic surgeries, the experience of the surgical team including the assistant surgeons and nursing staffs, and the complexity of the diseases. We discourage performance of robotic hepatectomy in the occasional patient by a team that is not well prepared and is not embedded in a specialized center. Knowledge and practical skills are both required in MIS liver surgery and cannot be replaced by newer tools, including the most advanced robotic system.
机器人手术系统的引入彻底改变了微创手术(MIS)的实践方式。尽管关于机器人肝切除术的报道数据较少,但至少在失血量、发病率、死亡率和住院时间方面,它似乎与传统腹腔镜手术方法相似。机器人系统在肝脏手术中的应用尚未得到充分评估,尤其是学习曲线方面。通过在MEDLINE和PubMed数据库中搜索2001年1月至2016年5月期间使用关键词“腹腔镜肝切除术”、“机器人肝切除术”和“学习曲线”的文章来确定相关研究。由于机器人肝切除术的数据有限,机器人肝切除术的学习曲线模型需要基于传统腹腔镜肝切除术的经验。根据腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线研究经验,克服学习曲线所需的腹腔镜小肝切除术和大肝切除术的最少病例数分别为22 - 64例和45 - 75例。左外侧肝段切除术技术更为标准化,是MIS肝脏手术培训的良好开端。然而,机器人肝脏外科医生所需的培训计划仍然高度依赖于外科医生以往开放和腹腔镜肝脏手术的经验、外科医生以往其他机器人手术的经验、包括助理外科医生和护理人员在内的手术团队的经验以及疾病的复杂性。我们不鼓励由准备不充分且未隶属于专业中心的团队为偶尔的患者进行机器人肝切除术。MIS肝脏手术既需要知识也需要实践技能,不能被更新的工具所取代,包括最先进的机器人系统。