• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与机器人肝切除术:单中心经验

Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre.

作者信息

Lee Kit-Fai, Cheung Yue-Sun, Chong Charing C N, Wong John, Fong Anthony K W, Lai Paul B S

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2016 Mar;86(3):122-6. doi: 10.1111/ans.13339. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1111/ans.13339
PMID:26423216
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy have been adopted in our centre for selected patients with benign or malignant liver diseases. This article reports the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches and tries to determine any difference between them.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for all patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and robotic hepatectomy (RH) in our institute. The perioperative results were reported and compared. In order to standardise the type of liver resection performed, a subgroup analysis was made for laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LS) and robotic left lateral sectionectomy (RS).

RESULTS

Sixty-six LH and 70 RH were performed between November 2003 and January 2015. The two groups were comparable in demographic data and disease characteristics except more patient with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) occurred in RH group. More major hepatectomies were performed in RH (20.0% versus 3.0%, P = 0.002). There was no mortality. No difference was noted in morbidity (LH 4.5%, RH 11.4%), conversion rate (LH 12.1%, RH 5.7%), median blood loss (both 100 mL) and median length of post-operative hospital stay (both 5 days) but operative time was longer in RH (251.5 min versus 215 min, P = 0.008). There were 29 LS and 38 RS, no difference was noted in all perioperative outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy are safe and their perioperative outcomes are comparable and favourable.

摘要

背景

在我们中心,对于选定的患有良性或恶性肝脏疾病的患者,已采用腹腔镜肝切除术和机器人辅助肝切除术。本文报告了这两种手术方式的围手术期结果,并试图确定它们之间的差异。

方法

对我院所有接受腹腔镜肝切除术(LH)和机器人辅助肝切除术(RH)的患者进行了前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。报告并比较围手术期结果。为了标准化所进行的肝切除类型,对腹腔镜左外侧段切除术(LS)和机器人辅助左外侧段切除术(RS)进行了亚组分析。

结果

2003年11月至2015年1月期间共进行了66例LH和70例RH。除RH组复发性化脓性胆管炎(RPC)患者更多外,两组在人口统计学数据和疾病特征方面具有可比性。RH组进行的大肝切除术更多(20.0%对3.0%,P = 0.002)。无死亡病例。在发病率(LH 4.5%,RH 11.4%)、转化率(LH 12.1%,RH 5.7%)、中位失血量(均为100 mL)和术后住院中位时间(均为5天)方面未发现差异,但RH组手术时间更长(251.5分钟对215分钟,P = 0.008)。有29例LS和38例RS,两组在所有围手术期结果方面均未发现差异。

结论

腹腔镜肝切除术和机器人辅助肝切除术均安全,其围手术期结果具有可比性且良好。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre.腹腔镜与机器人肝切除术:单中心经验
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Mar;86(3):122-6. doi: 10.1111/ans.13339. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肝左外叶切除术
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4756-4764. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4803-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in complex cases of left lateral sectionectomy.机器人与腹腔镜左外叶切除术治疗复杂病例。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jul;67:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Robotic Minor Hepatectomy Offers a Favorable Learning Curve and May Result in Superior Perioperative Outcomes Compared with Laparoscopic Approach.与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助小肝切除术具有良好的学习曲线,且围手术期结果可能更佳。
Am Surg. 2017 Oct 1;83(10):1085-1088.
5
Robotic, laparoscopic or open hemihepatectomy for giant liver haemangiomas over 10 cm in diameter.机器人辅助、腹腔镜或开放半肝切除术治疗直径超过10厘米的巨大肝血管瘤。
BMC Surg. 2020 May 6;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00760-5.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术:来自单一中心的比较研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec;399(8):1039-45. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1238-y. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: A single-center, propensity score- matched study.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心、倾向评分匹配研究。
Asian J Surg. 2023 Sep;46(9):3593-3600. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.07.049. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
8
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy.倾向评分匹配分析比较机器人与腹腔镜右半肝及右三叶切除术。
JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):436-444. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0161.
9
Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients.新加坡机器人肝切除术的初步经验:对43例连续患者的48例切除术的分析
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):201-205. doi: 10.1111/ans.14417. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Long-term Survival Analysis of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜肝癌切除术的长期生存分析:一项比较研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Apr;26(2):162-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000254.

引用本文的文献

1
An updated meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopy hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of liver tumors.机器人辅助腹腔镜肝切除术与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝肿瘤的疗效及安全性的最新荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 3;104(1):e40866. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040866.
2
International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023.2023 年国际专家机器人肝切除术共识指南。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 28;29(32):4815-4830. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815.
3
Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis of 224 patients.
肝细胞癌的微创与开放肝切除术:224例患者的倾向评分匹配分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Mar 14;408(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02857-w.
4
Does Robotic Liver Surgery Enhance R0 Results in Liver Malignancies during Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人肝脏手术在微创肝脏手术中是否能提高肝脏恶性肿瘤的R0切除率?一项系统评价和Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 11;14(14):3360. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143360.
5
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minor hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肝段切除术治疗肝脏良性肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 30;100(17):e25648. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025648.
6
Robotic Surgery for Malignant Liver Disease: a Systematic Review of Oncological and Surgical Outcomes.恶性肝脏疾病的机器人手术:肿瘤学及手术结局的系统评价
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):565-572. doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00945-2. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
7
State of the art in robotic liver surgery: a meta-analysis.机器人肝手术的最新技术:荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):977-987. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00906-3. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.机器人辅助肝切除术与腹腔镜肝切除术的临床疗效比较:荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240593. eCollection 2020.
9
Long-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Matching Analysis.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗转移性结直肠癌的长期和肿瘤学结局:一项多中心、倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):887-895. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05270-x.
10
Chasing the right path: tips, tricks and challenges of robotic approach to posterior segments.追寻正确路径:机器人辅助后段手术的技巧、窍门与挑战
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Oct;8(5):512-514. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.04.07.