• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The 2014 Updated GOLD Strategy: A Comparison of the Various Scenarios.《2014年更新的全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)策略:不同情景比较》
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2014 Sep 25;1(2):212-220. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.1.2.2014.0135.
2
Investigating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and Modified Medical Research Council scale according to GOLD using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire cutoff 25 (and 20) as reference.以圣乔治呼吸问卷评分25(及20)为参照,根据慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)标准,研究临床慢性阻塞性肺疾病问卷、慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试及改良医学研究委员会量表的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 May 18;11:1045-52. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S99793. eCollection 2016.
3
[Comparison of different evaluation systems for assessing disease severity and treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者疾病严重程度及治疗疗效评估的不同评估系统比较]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Jul 20;41(7):1119-1124. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.07.23.
4
Responsiveness and MCID Estimates for CAT, CCQ, and HADS in Patients With COPD Undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Prospective Analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者接受肺康复治疗时CAT、CCQ和HADS的反应性及最小临床重要差异估计:一项前瞻性分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
5
Determinants of Clinical COPD Questionnaire in Patients with COPD: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者临床慢性阻塞性肺疾病问卷的决定因素:一项横断面观察性研究。
Respiration. 2020;99(7):606-616. doi: 10.1159/000507097. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Stages of disease severity and factors that affect the health status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疾病严重程度阶段及影响其健康状况的因素。
Respir Med. 2000 Sep;94(9):841-6. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0804.
7
Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools.评估随时间推移的健康状况:回顾期和锚定问题对 COPD 健康状况工具的最小临床重要差异的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 26;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7.
8
The Comparison of Clinical Variables in Two Classifications: GOLD 2017 Combined Assessment and Spirometric Stage of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.两种分类中临床变量的比较:慢性阻塞性肺疾病的GOLD 2017综合评估与肺量计分期
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2018 Oct;81(4):281-288. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0114. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
9
Comparisons of health status scores with MRC grades in COPD: implications for the GOLD 2011 classification.COPD 患者健康状况评分与 MRC 分级的比较:对 GOLD 2011 分类的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Sep;42(3):647-54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00125612. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10
Baseline Severity as Predictor of Change in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire Scores in Trials of Long-acting Bronchodilators with COPD Patients.在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中使用长效支气管扩张剂的试验中,基线严重程度作为圣乔治呼吸问卷评分变化的预测指标。
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017 Mar 21;4(2):132-140. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.2.2017.0129.

引用本文的文献

1
How to Utilize CAT and mMRC Scores to Assess Symptom Status of Patients with COPD in Clinical Practice?如何在临床实践中利用CAT和mMRC评分评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的症状状态?
Medeni Med J. 2022 Jun 23;37(2):173-179. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.06787.
2
Characteristics of 2017 GOLD COPD group A: a multicenter cross-sectional CAP study in Japan.2017年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议A组的特征:日本一项多中心横断面社区获得性肺炎研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 5;13:3901-3907. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S181938. eCollection 2018.
3
Contribution of individual COPD assessment test (CAT) items to CAT total score and effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on CAT scores.COPD 评估测试(CAT)各项目对 CAT 总分的贡献以及肺康复对 CAT 评分的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Oct 30;16(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1034-4.
4
Sputum microbiology predicts health status in COPD.痰液微生物学可预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的健康状况。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 7;11:2741-2748. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S117079. eCollection 2016.
5
Impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and its responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: protocol of the Chance study.心血管合并症对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者COPD评估测试(CAT)的影响及其对肺康复的反应性:Chance研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 21;5(7):e007536. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007536.

本文引用的文献

1
New GOLD classification: longitudinal data on group assignment.新 GOLD 分类:分组的纵向数据。
Respir Res. 2014 Jan 13;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-3.
2
GOLD 2011 disease severity classification in COPDGene: a prospective cohort study.COPDGene 研究中的 GOLD 2011 疾病严重程度分类:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Mar;1(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(12)70044-9. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
3
Impact of symptoms of anxiety and depression on COPD Assessment Test scores.焦虑和抑郁症状对慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试分数的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2014 Mar;43(3):898-900. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00163913. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
4
Characteristics of a COPD population categorised using the GOLD framework by health status and exacerbations.使用慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)框架按健康状况和急性加重情况分类的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)人群的特征
Respir Med. 2014 Jan;108(1):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2011 symptom/risk assessment in α1-antitrypsin deficiency.慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议 2011 年 α1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症的症状/风险评估。
Chest. 2013 Oct;144(4):1152-1162. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0161.
6
Characteristics, stability and outcomes of the 2011 GOLD COPD groups in the ECLIPSE cohort.2011 GOLD COPD 分组在 ECLIPSE 队列中的特征、稳定性和结局。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Sep;42(3):636-46. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00195212. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
Differences in classification of COPD group using COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores: a cross-sectional analyses.使用 COPD 评估测试 (CAT) 或改良版医学研究理事会呼吸困难评分 (mMRC) 对 COPD 组进行分类的差异:一项横断面分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Jun 3;13:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-35.
8
FAQs about the GOLD 2011 assessment proposal of COPD: a comparative analysis of four different cohorts.关于 GOLD 2011 评估提案的常见问题解答:四个不同队列的比较分析。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Nov;42(5):1391-401. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00036513. Epub 2013 May 3.
9
Within-day test-retest reliability of the Timed Up & Go test in patients with advanced chronic organ failure.日内重测信度的 Timed Up & Go 测试在患有晚期慢性器官衰竭的患者中。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Usefulness of the COPD assessment test (CAT) in primary care.慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)在初级保健中的效用。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Mar;22(1):8-9. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00022.

《2014年更新的全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)策略:不同情景比较》

The 2014 Updated GOLD Strategy: A Comparison of the Various Scenarios.

作者信息

Wilke Sarah, Smid Dionne E, Spruit Martijn A, Janssen Daisy J A, Muris Jean W M, van der Molen Thys, van den Akker Marjan, Jones Paul W, Wouters Emiel F M, Franssen Frits M E

机构信息

Joint first author.

Department of Research and Education, CIRO+, Centre of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, Horn, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2014 Sep 25;1(2):212-220. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.1.2.2014.0135.

DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.1.2.2014.0135
PMID:28848823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5556866/
Abstract

: The 2014 updated Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy added the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) as the fourth possible symptoms measure. The impact of the suggested tools for symptoms of COPD and the different definitions of future risk on the frequency distribution and clinical characteristics of the GOLD groups remain unknown. : Demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in 542 patients with COPD (57.7% male, age 64.6 [9.0] years, FEV 54.7 [22.3]% predicted). Health status was assessed by the COPD-specific SGRQ and symptoms of anxiety and depression by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) subscale. Cohen's Kappa was used to assess agreement between groups. : Level of agreement in frequency distribution using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea (mMRC) scale ≥2, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) ≥10, Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) ≥1 and SGRQ ≥25 was moderate to very good. Best agreement was reached between CCQ and SGRQ (К = 0.838 or 0.851, p<0.001). Patients classified in mMRC GOLD A reported higher SGRQ scores, higher HADS-A and HADS-D scores compared to patients classified in CAT GOLD A or SGRQ GOLD A. Outcomes were comparable between the risk assessment groups. : Choice of the symptom measure impacts GOLD groups more than choice of the exacerbation risk assessment. Health care professionals should be aware that patients are heterogeneous in terms of health status and symptoms of anxiety and depression based on the symptom measure used.

摘要

2014年更新的慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)策略增加了圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)作为第四种可能的症状测量方法。COPD症状的建议工具以及未来风险的不同定义对GOLD组频率分布和临床特征的影响尚不清楚。

对542例COPD患者的人口统计学和临床特征进行了评估(男性占57.7%,年龄64.6 [9.0]岁,FEV为预测值的54.7 [22.3]%)。通过COPD特异性SGRQ评估健康状况,通过医院焦虑抑郁量表、焦虑(HADS - A)和抑郁(HADS - D)子量表评估焦虑和抑郁症状。使用科恩kappa系数评估组间一致性。

使用改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)≥2、慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)≥10、临床慢性阻塞性肺疾病问卷(CCQ)≥1和SGRQ≥25时,频率分布的一致性水平为中度至非常好。CCQ和SGRQ之间达成了最佳一致性(К = 0.838或0.851,p<0.001)。与CAT GOLD A或SGRQ GOLD A分类的患者相比,mMRC GOLD A分类的患者报告的SGRQ得分、HADS - A和HADS - D得分更高。风险评估组之间的结果具有可比性。

症状测量方法的选择对GOLD组的影响大于急性加重风险评估方法的选择。医疗保健专业人员应意识到,根据所使用的症状测量方法,患者在健康状况以及焦虑和抑郁症状方面存在异质性。