Layton Aimee M, Armstrong Hilary F, Moran Sienna L, Guenette Jordan A, Thomashow Byron M, Jellen Patricia A, Bartels Matthew N, Sheel A William, Basner Robert C
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015 Jan 1;2(1):61-69. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2.1.2014.0145.
This study quantitatively measured the effects of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on spirometry, static and dynamic lung and chest wall volume subdivision mechanics, and cardiopulmonary exercise measures. Patients with severe COPD (mean FEV = 23 ± 6% predicted) undergoing LVRS evaluation were recruited. Spirometry, plethysmography and exercise capacity were obtained within 6 months pre-LVRS and again within 12 months post- LVRS. Ventilatory mechanics were quantified using stationary optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) during spontaneous tidal breathing and during maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV). Statistical significance was set at < 0.05. :Ten consecutive patients met criteria for LVRS (5 females, 5 males, age: 62±6yrs). Post -LVRS (mean follow up 7 months ± 2 months), the group showed significant improvements in dyspnea scores (pre 4±1 versus post 2 ± 2), peak exercise workload (pre 37± 21 watts versus post 50 ± 27watts ), heart rate (pre 109±19 beats per minutes [bpm] versus post 118±19 bpm), duty cycle (pre 30.8 ± 3.8% versus post 38.0 ± 5.7%), and spirometric measurements (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV] pre 23 ± 6% versus post 32 ± 13%, total lung capacity / residual lung volume pre 50 ± 8 versus 50 ± 11) . Six to 12 month changes in OEP measurements were observed in an increased percent contribution of the abdomen compartment during tidal breathing (41.2±6.2% versus 44.3±8.9%, =0.03) and in percent contribution of the pulmonary ribcage compartment during MVV (34.5±10.3 versus 44.9±11.1%, =0.02). Significant improvements in dynamic hyperinflation during MVV occurred, demonstrated by decreases rather than increases in end expiratory volume (EEV) in the pulmonary ribcage (pre 207.0 ± 288.2 ml versus post -85.0 ± 255.9 ml) and abdominal ribcage compartments (pre 229.1 ± 182.4 ml versus post -17.0 ± 136.2 ml) during the maneuver. Post-LVRS, patients with severe COPD demonstrate significant favorable changes in ventilatory mechanics, during tidal and maximal voluntary breathing. Future work is necessary to determine if these findings are clinically relevant, and extend to other environments such as exercise.
本研究定量测量了肺减容手术(LVRS)对肺量测定、静态和动态肺及胸壁容积细分力学以及心肺运动指标的影响。招募了正在接受LVRS评估的重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者(预计平均第1秒用力呼气容积[FEV₁] = 23 ± 6%)。在LVRS术前6个月内及术后12个月内分别进行肺量测定、体积描记法和运动能力测试。在自主潮气呼吸和最大自主通气(MVV)期间,使用静态光电体积描记法(OEP)对通气力学进行量化。设定统计学显著性水平为< 0.05。连续10例患者符合LVRS标准(5例女性,5例男性,年龄:62±6岁)。LVRS术后(平均随访7个月±2个月),该组患者在呼吸困难评分(术前4±1分,术后2 ± 2分)、运动峰值工作量(术前37±21瓦,术后50 ± 27瓦)、心率(术前109±19次/分钟[bpm],术后118±19 bpm)、占空比(术前30.8 ± 3.8%,术后38.0 ± 5.7%)以及肺量测定指标(第1秒用力呼气容积[FEV₁]术前23 ± 6%,术后32 ± 13%;肺总量/残气量术前50 ± 8,术后50 ± 11)方面均有显著改善。观察到OEP测量在6至12个月的变化,即潮气呼吸期间腹部腔室的贡献百分比增加(41.2±6.2%对44.3±8.9%,P = 0.03),MVV期间肺胸廓腔室的贡献百分比增加(34.5±10.3对44.9±11.1%,P = 0.02)。MVV期间动态肺过度充气有显著改善,表现为肺胸廓(术前终末呼气容积[EEV]为207.0 ± 288.2 ml,术后为 - 85.0 ± 255.9 ml)和腹部胸廓腔室(术前229.1 ± 182.4 ml,术后为 - 17.0 ± 136.2 ml)在该操作过程中EEV减少而非增加。LVRS术后,重度COPD患者在潮气呼吸和最大自主呼吸期间的通气力学有显著的有利变化。有必要开展进一步研究以确定这些发现是否具有临床相关性,并扩展到其他环境,如运动环境。