• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Tiotropium on Outcomes in Patients With COPD, Categorized Using the New GOLD Grading System: Results of the UPLIFT® Randomized Controlled Trial.噻托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者预后的影响(采用新的全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)分级系统进行分类):UPLIFT®随机对照试验结果
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015 Jun 23;2(3):236-251. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2.3.2014.0142.
2
Effect of tiotropium on outcomes in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UPLIFT): a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial.噻托溴铵对中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者预后的影响(UPLIFT):一项随机对照试验的预设亚组分析
Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61298-8. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
3
Long-acting beta2-agonist in addition to tiotropium versus either tiotropium or long-acting beta2-agonist alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效β2受体激动剂联合噻托溴铵与单独使用噻托溴铵或长效β2受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD008989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008989.pub3.
4
Effect of tiotropium in men and women with COPD: results of the 4-year UPLIFT trial.噻托溴铵对 COPD 男性和女性患者的影响:4 年 UPLIFT 试验结果。
Respir Med. 2010 Oct;104(10):1495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.03.033. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
5
Efficacy of tiotropium in COPD patients with FEV1 ≥ 60% participating in the UPLIFT® trial.噻托溴铵在 UPLIFT®试验中 FEV1≥60%的 COPD 患者中的疗效。
COPD. 2012 Jun;9(3):289-96. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2012.656211. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
6
Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD009285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009285.pub2.
7
Tiotropium in Early-Stage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.噻托溴铵治疗早期慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 7;377(10):923-935. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700228.
8
Efficacy of tiotropium in COPD patients from Asia: a subgroup analysis from the UPLIFT trial.噻托溴铵治疗亚洲 COPD 患者的疗效:来自 UPLIFT 试验的亚组分析。
Respirology. 2011 Jul;16(5):825-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01982.x.
9
COPD in young patients: a pre-specified analysis of the four-year trial of tiotropium (UPLIFT).年轻患者中的 COPD:噻托溴铵(UPLIFT)四年试验的预先指定分析。
Respir Med. 2010 Nov;104(11):1659-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.016. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
10
[The efficacy and safety of low-dose tiotropium bromide inhaled via Respimat® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[通过Respimat®吸入低剂量噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Dec;53(12):964-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Exacerbation History on the Safety and Efficacy of Aclidinium in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Increased Cardiovascular Risk: ASCENT-COPD Trial.加重病史对伴有心血管风险增加的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用阿地氯铵的安全性和疗效的影响:ASCENT-COPD 试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Mar 18;16:689-699. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S285068. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Tiotropium in patients with moderate COPD naive to maintenance therapy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.噻托溴铵治疗初治中度 COPD 患者的随机安慰剂对照试验。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 May 20;24:14003. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.3.
2
Comparison of 2011 and 2007 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines for predicting mortality and hospitalization.2011 年和 2007 年全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议指南预测死亡率和住院率的比较。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):51-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2276OC.
3
Distribution and prognostic validity of the new Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease grading classification.新的全球慢性阻塞性肺病倡议分级分类的分布和预后有效性。
Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):694-702. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1053.
4
Prediction of the clinical course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, using the new GOLD classification: a study of the general population.采用新 GOLD 分类法预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床病程:一项普通人群研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Nov 15;186(10):975-81. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201207-1299OC. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
5
Assessing health status in COPD. A head-to-head comparison between the COPD assessment test (CAT) and the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ).评估 COPD 患者的健康状况。COPD 评估测试(CAT)和临床 COPD 问卷(CCQ)的头对头比较。
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 May 20;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-20.
6
Properties of the COPD assessment test in a cross-sectional European study.COPD 评估测试在一项欧洲横断面研究中的特性。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Jul;38(1):29-35. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00177210. Epub 2011 May 12.
7
Predictive accuracy of patient-reported exacerbation frequency in COPD.COPD 患者报告的加重频率的预测准确性。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Mar;37(3):501-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00035909. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
8
Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test.COPD 评估测试的制定与首次验证。
Eur Respir J. 2009 Sep;34(3):648-54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00102509.
9
Effect of tiotropium on outcomes in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UPLIFT): a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial.噻托溴铵对中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者预后的影响(UPLIFT):一项随机对照试验的预设亚组分析
Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61298-8. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
10
A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的4年试验。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1543-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805800. Epub 2008 Oct 5.

噻托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者预后的影响(采用新的全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)分级系统进行分类):UPLIFT®随机对照试验结果

Effect of Tiotropium on Outcomes in Patients With COPD, Categorized Using the New GOLD Grading System: Results of the UPLIFT® Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Halpin David M G, Tashkin Donald P, Celli Bartolome R, Leimer Inge, Metzdorf Norbert, Decramer Marc

机构信息

Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California- Los Angeles.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015 Jun 23;2(3):236-251. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2.3.2014.0142.

DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.2.3.2014.0142
PMID:28848846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5556886/
Abstract

A retrospective analysis of the Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT®) trial data was performed, grading patients by the 2013 Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity groups. The number of antibiotics/systemic corticosteroids courses and hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits for COPD in the preceding year, baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score were used to grade patients: 357 (6.3%), 1421 (24.9%), 299 (5.2%), and 3636 (63.7%) in Groups A-D, respectively. Mean FEV1 was higher and SGRQ scores lower with tiotropium than usual care (control) in all GOLD groups at all post-baseline time points during treatment. In the control group, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) exacerbation rates per patient per year were highest in Group D (1.01 [0.96, 1.07]), similar in Groups B (0.63 [0.57, 0.69]) and C (0.72 [0.59, 0.87]), and lowest in Group A (0.48 [0.39, 0.59]). Tiotropium significantly prolonged time to first exacerbation versus control in Groups B and D (hazard ratios [95% CI]: 0.79 [0.69, 0.91] and 0.89 [0.82, 0.96]); in Groups A and C, similar effects were observed, reflecting the small size of these groups. The number of exacerbations per patient-year was lower with tiotropium than control in all GOLD groups (rate ratios 0.64, 0.72, 0.91, and 0.89 for Groups A-D; < 0.005 for all but Group C ( = 0.4978). The incidence rate of major adverse cardiac events was higher in Group D than in Groups A-C but lower within the group in patients treated with tiotropium. In conclusion, tiotropium improved lung function and health status, and reduced exacerbation rates in patients in all GOLD groups.

摘要

对噻托溴铵对肺功能潜在长期影响的理解(UPLIFT®)试验数据进行了回顾性分析,根据2013年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)严重程度分组对患者进行分级。使用前一年慢性阻塞性肺疾病的抗生素/全身糖皮质激素疗程数、住院/急诊就诊次数、基线第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分对患者进行分级:A-D组分别有357例(6.3%)、1421例(24.9%)、299例(5.2%)和3636例(63.7%)。在治疗期间所有基线后时间点,所有GOLD组中,噻托溴铵治疗组的平均FEV₁均高于常规治疗(对照组),SGRQ评分低于常规治疗组。在对照组中,D组患者每年的平均(95%置信区间[CI])急性加重率最高(1.01[0.96,1.07]),B组(0.63[0.57,0.69])和C组(0.72[0.59,0.87])相似,A组最低(0.48[0.39,0.59])。与对照组相比,噻托溴铵显著延长了B组和D组首次急性加重的时间(风险比[95%CI]:0.79[0.69,0.91]和0.89[0.82,0.96]);在A组和C组中也观察到了类似的效果,只是这两组样本量较小。在所有GOLD组中,噻托溴铵治疗组患者每年的急性加重次数均低于对照组(A-D组的率比分别为0.64、0.72、0.91和0.89;除C组外均<0.005,C组P = 0.4978)。D组主要不良心脏事件的发生率高于A-C组,但在噻托溴铵治疗的患者组内较低。总之,噻托溴铵改善了所有GOLD组患者的肺功能和健康状况,并降低了急性加重率。