Halpin David M G, Tashkin Donald P, Celli Bartolome R, Leimer Inge, Metzdorf Norbert, Decramer Marc
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California- Los Angeles.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015 Jun 23;2(3):236-251. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2.3.2014.0142.
A retrospective analysis of the Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT®) trial data was performed, grading patients by the 2013 Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity groups. The number of antibiotics/systemic corticosteroids courses and hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits for COPD in the preceding year, baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score were used to grade patients: 357 (6.3%), 1421 (24.9%), 299 (5.2%), and 3636 (63.7%) in Groups A-D, respectively. Mean FEV1 was higher and SGRQ scores lower with tiotropium than usual care (control) in all GOLD groups at all post-baseline time points during treatment. In the control group, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) exacerbation rates per patient per year were highest in Group D (1.01 [0.96, 1.07]), similar in Groups B (0.63 [0.57, 0.69]) and C (0.72 [0.59, 0.87]), and lowest in Group A (0.48 [0.39, 0.59]). Tiotropium significantly prolonged time to first exacerbation versus control in Groups B and D (hazard ratios [95% CI]: 0.79 [0.69, 0.91] and 0.89 [0.82, 0.96]); in Groups A and C, similar effects were observed, reflecting the small size of these groups. The number of exacerbations per patient-year was lower with tiotropium than control in all GOLD groups (rate ratios 0.64, 0.72, 0.91, and 0.89 for Groups A-D; < 0.005 for all but Group C ( = 0.4978). The incidence rate of major adverse cardiac events was higher in Group D than in Groups A-C but lower within the group in patients treated with tiotropium. In conclusion, tiotropium improved lung function and health status, and reduced exacerbation rates in patients in all GOLD groups.
对噻托溴铵对肺功能潜在长期影响的理解(UPLIFT®)试验数据进行了回顾性分析,根据2013年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)严重程度分组对患者进行分级。使用前一年慢性阻塞性肺疾病的抗生素/全身糖皮质激素疗程数、住院/急诊就诊次数、基线第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分对患者进行分级:A-D组分别有357例(6.3%)、1421例(24.9%)、299例(5.2%)和3636例(63.7%)。在治疗期间所有基线后时间点,所有GOLD组中,噻托溴铵治疗组的平均FEV₁均高于常规治疗(对照组),SGRQ评分低于常规治疗组。在对照组中,D组患者每年的平均(95%置信区间[CI])急性加重率最高(1.01[0.96,1.07]),B组(0.63[0.57,0.69])和C组(0.72[0.59,0.87])相似,A组最低(0.48[0.39,0.59])。与对照组相比,噻托溴铵显著延长了B组和D组首次急性加重的时间(风险比[95%CI]:0.79[0.69,0.91]和0.89[0.82,0.96]);在A组和C组中也观察到了类似的效果,只是这两组样本量较小。在所有GOLD组中,噻托溴铵治疗组患者每年的急性加重次数均低于对照组(A-D组的率比分别为0.64、0.72、0.91和0.89;除C组外均<0.005,C组P = 0.4978)。D组主要不良心脏事件的发生率高于A-C组,但在噻托溴铵治疗的患者组内较低。总之,噻托溴铵改善了所有GOLD组患者的肺功能和健康状况,并降低了急性加重率。