• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常生活记忆问卷在创伤性脑损伤患者中的因子分析。

Factor analysis of the everyday memory questionnaire in persons with traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

a Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Baylor College of Medicine and Harris Health System , Houston , TX , USA.

b Brain Injury Research Center , Houston , TX , USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):495-509. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1368714. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1080/13854046.2017.1368714
PMID:28849703
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the factor structure of the Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ) in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHOD

This was a secondary analysis of baseline data from two clinical trials targeting memory impairment after TBI. Participants were 169 persons with complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI at an average of 41 months post-injury. They completed the EMQ via clinical interview. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted using a three-factor principal axis factoring estimation method with a polychoric correlation matrix and oblique rotation.

RESULTS

The three factors accounted for 49.2% of the variance, with moderate correlations observed among the factors. The three factors appeared to represent general everyday memory (prospective and episodic), conversational memory, and spatial or action memory. The three factors added significantly to the variance in age-corrected objective learning test scores predicted by injury severity, education, and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

The three factors of the EMQ are consistent with the heterogeneity of memory impairments observed after TBI. The factor scores may be used to target treatments for impaired memory and to evaluate their effectiveness.

摘要

目的

探讨创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者日常记忆问卷(EMQ)的因子结构。

方法

这是两项针对 TBI 后记忆障碍的临床试验基线数据的二次分析。参与者为 169 名复杂性轻度、中度或重度 TBI 患者,平均受伤后 41 个月。他们通过临床访谈完成 EMQ。使用具有偏斜旋转的三因子主轴因子分析估计方法,对多元相关矩阵进行探索性因子分析。

结果

三个因子解释了 49.2%的方差,因子之间存在中等相关性。这三个因子似乎代表了一般的日常记忆(前瞻性和情景性)、会话记忆以及空间或动作记忆。这三个因子显著增加了损伤严重程度、教育和性别预测的年龄校正客观学习测试分数的方差。

结论

EMQ 的三个因子与 TBI 后观察到的记忆障碍的异质性一致。因子得分可用于针对受损记忆进行治疗,并评估其疗效。

相似文献

1
Factor analysis of the everyday memory questionnaire in persons with traumatic brain injury.日常生活记忆问卷在创伤性脑损伤患者中的因子分析。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):495-509. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1368714. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
2
The efficacy of prospective memory rehabilitation plus metacognitive skills training for adults with traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.前瞻性记忆康复联合元认知技能训练对创伤性脑损伤成人的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 5;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1758-6.
3
A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in survivors of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤幸存者工作记忆损伤的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychology. 2016 Oct;30(7):811-819. doi: 10.1037/neu0000285. Epub 2016 May 16.
4
Ecological Assessment of Everyday Executive Functioning at Home and at School Following Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury Using the BRIEF Questionnaire.使用BRIEF问卷对儿童创伤性脑损伤后在家和学校的日常执行功能进行生态评估。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017 Nov/Dec;32(6):E1-E12. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000295.
5
What are the most common memory complaints following stroke? A frequency and exploratory factor analysis of items from the Everyday Memory Questionnaire-Revised.中风后最常见的记忆抱怨有哪些?来自日常生活记忆问卷修订版的项目的频率和探索性因素分析。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Apr;34(3):498-511. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1652349. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Recovery of episodic memory subprocesses in mild and complicated mild traumatic brain injury at 1 and 12 months post injury.轻度和复杂性轻度创伤性脑损伤患者在受伤后1个月和12个月时情景记忆子过程的恢复情况。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Nov;38(9):1005-14. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1182968. Epub 2016 May 18.
7
An RCT to Treat Learning Impairment in Traumatic Brain Injury: The TBI-MEM Trial.一项治疗创伤性脑损伤学习障碍的随机对照试验:TBI-MEM试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jul;30(6):539-50. doi: 10.1177/1545968315604395. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
8
Validity of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone in Level 1 Trauma Center Patients Six Months Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study.电话式成人认知简短测试在创伤中心创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月患者中的有效性:TRACK-TBI 研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Apr 15;38(8):1048-1059. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7295. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
A comparison of laboratory, clinical, and self-report measures of prospective memory in healthy adults and individuals with brain injury.健康成年人与脑损伤个体前瞻性记忆的实验室、临床及自我报告测量方法比较。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Jun;40(5):423-436. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1371280. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
10
Perseveration during verbal fluency in traumatic brain injury reflects impairments in working memory.创伤性脑损伤患者言语流畅性测试中的持续言语反映了工作记忆的损伤。
Neuropsychology. 2016 Oct;30(7):791-9. doi: 10.1037/neu0000286. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Everyday Memory Questionnaire-Revised (EMQ-R): Psychometric Validation of the European Portuguese Version in Non-Clinical Sample.日常记忆问卷修订版(EMQ-R):欧洲葡萄牙语版本在非临床样本中的心理测量学验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 27;15(3):280. doi: 10.3390/bs15030280.
2
Predictors of subjective memory functioning in young adults.年轻成年人主观记忆功能的预测因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06568-y.
3
Subjective memory measures: Metamemory questionnaires currently in use.主观记忆测量:目前使用的元记忆问卷。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):924-942. doi: 10.1177/17470218231183855. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
4
Clinical and cost effectiveness of memory rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.创伤性脑损伤后记忆康复的临床和成本效益:一项实用的聚类随机对照试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1171-1184. doi: 10.1177/0269215519840069. Epub 2019 Apr 12.