Giagloglou Evanthia, Radenkovic Milan, Brankovic Sasa, Antoniou Panagiotis, Zivanovic-Macuzic Ivana
a Department of Mechanical Engineering , University of Kragujevac , Serbia.
b Clinic for Psychiatry , Clinical Centre of Serbia , Serbia.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Jun;25(2):296-304. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1370231. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
One of the most frequent manual occupational tasks involves the pushing and pulling of a cart. Although several studies have associated health risks with pushing and pulling, the effects are not clear since occupational tasks have social, cognitive and physical components. The present work investigates a real case of a pushing and pulling occupational task from a manufacturing company. The study initially characterizes the case in accordance with Standard No. ISO 11228-2:2007 as low risk. An experiment with 14 individuals during three modalities of pushing and pulling was performed in order to further investigate the task with the application of electrophysiology. At the end, a simple questionnaire was given. The results show electrophysiological differences among the three modalities of pushing and pulling, with a major difference between action with no load and fully loaded with a full range of motions on the cart to handle.
最常见的体力劳动职业任务之一是推车。尽管多项研究已将健康风险与推拉动作联系起来,但由于职业任务包含社会、认知和身体等多个方面,其影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了一家制造公司中一项推拉职业任务的实际案例。该研究最初根据ISO 11228-2:2007标准将此案例定性为低风险。为了通过电生理学应用进一步研究该任务,对14名个体进行了三种推拉方式的实验。最后,发放了一份简单的问卷。结果显示,三种推拉方式之间存在电生理差异,其中空载动作与满载且在推车上进行全范围操作的动作之间差异显著。