• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难治性癌痛的多模式鞘内镇痛

Multimodal intrathecal analgesia in refractory cancer pain.

作者信息

Mastenbroek Thierry C, Kramp-Hendriks Bianca J, Kallewaard Jan Willem, Vonk Johanna M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2017 Jan;14:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.10.002
PMID:28850428
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cancer pain treatment has improved over the last decades. The majority of this population can be treated effectively with analgesics following the Guidelines of the original World Health Organisation (WHO). Unfortunately 10-15% of these patients still suffer from severe and refractory cancer pain, especially in the terminal phases of disease and require additional pain management modalities. Therefore, end-stage clinical interventions are particularly needed to minimize the perception of pain. With intrathecal therapy (ITT), drugs are delivered close to their site of action in the central nervous system avoiding first-pass metabolism and blood-brain barrier. It may improve analgesia with a smaller dose and possibly achieve a reduction in systemic or cerebral side effects compared to oral supplied medication alone. Multimodal analgesia enables further dose reduction with improved analgesia and fewer side effects.

METHODS

In this retrospective research we investigated the effectiveness and side-effect profile of intrathecal morphine, bupivacaine and clonidine. Patients were followed until death occurred. Pain scores and side effects were recorded before initiating ITT (T0), just after initiating ITT (T1), at hospital discharge (T2), in the ambulant setting (T3) and the last obtained scores before death occurred (T4).

RESULTS

Nine patients were included who suffered from severe and refractory cancer pain, not reacting to conventional pain management or had intolerable side effects. Primary tumour location was pancreatic (4), urothelial (3) and prostate (2). Primary pain was considered neuropathic or mixed neuropathic-nociceptive. The treatment team consisted of an anaesthetist, specialized nurse in coordination with primary physician, treating oncologist and specialized home care. All patients were free of pain after initiation of the intrathecal therapy. The average follow-up period was 11 weeks in which there was a slight increase in NRS-score. In the last days before death occurred, half the patients were still free of pain. There were no problems during insertion of the catheter, device malfunction or infection. No severe adverse events defined as hypotension requiring inotropes, respiratory depression or neurological deficits were observed. Three patients experienced mild hypotension which gradually decreased after clonidine dose adjustment. Lower extremity weakness occurred in three patients as well. After bupivacaine dose adjustment the weakness disappeared in two patients and in one patient the lower extremity weakness persisted as a result of conus compression by tumour.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Multimodal IT treatment with morphine, bupivacaine and clonidine is effective and safe for treating refractory cancer pain in the terminal phase of disease. The study offers an important contribution to literature where there is still lack of convincing evidence about the benefits and harms of this type of pain management in patients with otherwise refractory cancer pain.

摘要

背景与目的

在过去几十年中,癌症疼痛治疗有了改善。按照原世界卫生组织(WHO)的指南,这类患者中的大多数可以通过镇痛药得到有效治疗。不幸的是,这些患者中有10% - 15%仍遭受严重且难治的癌症疼痛,尤其是在疾病终末期,需要额外的疼痛管理方式。因此,特别需要终末期临床干预措施以尽量减少疼痛感受。通过鞘内治疗(ITT),药物在中枢神经系统中靠近其作用部位给药,避免了首过代谢和血脑屏障。与单独口服给药相比,它可能以较小剂量改善镇痛效果,并可能减少全身或脑部副作用。多模式镇痛可进一步减少剂量,同时改善镇痛效果并减少副作用。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了鞘内注射吗啡、布比卡因和可乐定的有效性及副作用情况。对患者进行随访直至死亡。在开始鞘内治疗前(T0)、刚开始鞘内治疗后(T1)、出院时(T2)、门诊环境下(T3)以及死亡前最后一次获得的评分(T4)记录疼痛评分和副作用。

结果

纳入了9例患有严重且难治性癌症疼痛、对传统疼痛管理无反应或有无法耐受的副作用的患者。原发肿瘤部位为胰腺(4例)、尿路上皮(3例)和前列腺(2例)。主要疼痛被认为是神经性或神经性 - 伤害性混合性疼痛。治疗团队由一名麻醉医生、与主治医生协调的专科护士、肿瘤内科医生和专科家庭护理人员组成。所有患者在开始鞘内治疗后均无疼痛。平均随访期为11周,在此期间数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)评分略有增加。在死亡前的最后几天,一半患者仍无疼痛。导管插入过程中、设备故障或感染方面均无问题。未观察到定义为需要使用血管活性药物的低血压、呼吸抑制或神经功能缺损等严重不良事件。3例患者出现轻度低血压,在调整可乐定剂量后逐渐减轻。3例患者也出现下肢无力。在调整布比卡因剂量后,2例患者的无力症状消失,1例患者因肿瘤压迫圆锥导致下肢无力持续存在。

结论与启示

吗啡、布比卡因和可乐定的多模式鞘内治疗对于治疗疾病终末期难治性癌症疼痛是有效且安全的。该研究为文献做出了重要贡献,因为对于这类难治性癌症疼痛患者的这种疼痛管理的利弊,仍缺乏令人信服的证据。

相似文献

1
Multimodal intrathecal analgesia in refractory cancer pain.难治性癌痛的多模式鞘内镇痛
Scand J Pain. 2017 Jan;14:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
2
Spinal analgesia for severe cancer pain: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients.重度癌痛的脊髓镇痛:60例患者的回顾性分析。
Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.04.073. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
Intrathecal pain treatment for severe pain in patients with terminal cancer: A retrospective analysis of treatment-related complications and side effects.鞘内疼痛治疗终末期癌症患者的重度疼痛:治疗相关并发症和副作用的回顾性分析。
Scand J Pain. 2024 Oct 4;24(1). doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2024-0041. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
4
The control of severe cancer pain by continuous intrathecal infusion and patient controlled intrathecal analgesia with morphine, bupivacaine and clonidine.通过持续鞘内输注以及患者自控鞘内镇痛法使用吗啡、布比卡因和可乐定控制重度癌痛。
Pain. 1998 Dec;78(3):217-220. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00133-X.
5
Continuous infusion of opioid and bupivacaine by externalized intrathecal catheters in long-term treatment of "refractory" nonmalignant pain.通过外置鞘内导管持续输注阿片类药物和布比卡因用于“难治性”非恶性疼痛的长期治疗。
Clin J Pain. 1998 Mar;14(1):17-28. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199803000-00004.
6
Intrathecal treatment in cancer patients unresponsive to multiple trials of systemic opioids.癌症患者对多次全身性阿片类药物试验无反应时的鞘内治疗。
Clin J Pain. 2007 Nov-Dec;23(9):793-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181565d17.
7
No Difference in Early Analgesia Between Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection and Intrathecal Morphine After TKA.全膝关节置换术后脂质体布比卡因注射与鞘内注射吗啡在早期镇痛方面无差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):94-105. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4931-z.
8
Erectile dysfunction as rare side effect in the simultaneous intrathecal application of morphine and clonidine.鞘内同时应用吗啡和可乐定导致罕见的勃起功能障碍副作用。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):E523-6.
9
Spinal clonidine prolongs labor analgesia from spinal sufentanil and bupivacaine.脊髓可乐定可延长脊髓舒芬太尼和布比卡因的分娩镇痛时间。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Mar;88(3):573-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199903000-00020.
10
Does Intrathecal Morphine in Spinal Anesthesia Have a Role in Modern Multimodal Analgesia for Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty?椎管内吗啡在原发性全关节置换术的现代多模式镇痛中是否有作用?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1693-1698. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Trialing Strategies Prior to Intrathecal Drug Delivery in Cancer-Related Pain: A Narrative Review.癌症相关疼痛鞘内药物输注前的试验策略:一项叙述性综述
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jun 19;29(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s11916-025-01409-9.
2
The Addition of Intrathecal Clonidine to Reduce Medication-Related Side-Effects in Cancer Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.鞘内注射可乐定以减少癌症疼痛中药物相关副作用的研究:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 21;18:1503-1509. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S504556. eCollection 2025.
3
Efficacy and safety of single and double catheter intrathecal drug delivery systems in patients with refractory neck and abdominal cancer pain.
单导管和双导管鞘内给药系统用于难治性颈部和腹部癌症疼痛患者的疗效和安全性
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):32072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83799-1.
4
Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Pain: A Health Technology Assessment.鞘内药物输送系统治疗癌症疼痛:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024 Jan 11;24(2):1-162. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of external system and implanted system in intrathecal therapy for refractory cancer pain in China: A retrospective study.中国难治性癌痛鞘内治疗中外置系统与植入系统的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jan;13(1):e2851. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2851. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
6
The Options for Neuraxial Drug Administration.椎管内药物给药选择。
CNS Drugs. 2022 Aug;36(8):877-896. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00936-y. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
7
Effectiveness of collaboration between oncology pharmacists and anaesthesiologists for inpatient cancer pain management: A pilot study in Taiwan.肿瘤药师与麻醉医师合作管理住院癌症疼痛的效果:台湾的一项试点研究。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Nov;49(11):3000605211055415. doi: 10.1177/03000605211055415.
8
Interventional Therapies for Pain in Cancer Patients: a Narrative Review.癌症患者疼痛的介入治疗:一项叙述性综述
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021 May 7;25(7):44. doi: 10.1007/s11916-021-00963-2.
9
Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy via a Percutaneous Port for Refractory Cancer Pain in China: An Efficacy, Safety and Cost Utilization Analysis.中国经皮端口鞘内注射吗啡治疗难治性癌痛:疗效、安全性及成本效益分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jan 23;13:231-237. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S233905. eCollection 2020.
10
Effects of Intraperitoneal and Intrathecal Morphine Analgesia on the Expression of μ-Opioid Receptors in Bone Cancer Pain Rats.腹腔内和鞘内注射吗啡镇痛对骨癌痛大鼠μ-阿片受体表达的影响
Dose Response. 2019 Oct 14;17(4):1559325819882873. doi: 10.1177/1559325819882873. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.