Groeneweg Ruud, Haanstra Tsjitske, Bolman Catherine A W, Oostendorp Rob A B, van Tulder Maurits W, Ostelo Raymond W J G
Department of Health Sciences & EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth & Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Scientific Institute for Quality of Health Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Scand J Pain. 2017 Jan;14:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
Identification of psychosocial variables may influence treatment outcome. The objective of this study was to prospectively examine whether psychosocial variables, in addition to clinical variables (pain, functioning, general health, previous neck pain, comorbidity), are predictive factors for treatment outcome (i.e. global perceived effect, functioning and pain) in patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain undergoing physical therapy or manual therapy. Psychosocial factors included treatment outcome expectancy and treatment credibility, health locus of control, and fear avoidance beliefs.
This study reports a secondary analysis of a primary care-based pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Potential predictors were measured at baseline and outcomes, in 181 patients, at 7 weeks and 26 weeks.
Hierarchical logistic regression models showed that treatment outcome expectancy predicted outcome success, in addition to clinical and demographic variables. Expectancy explained additional variance, ranging from 6% (pain) to 17% (functioning) at 7 weeks, and 8% (pain) to 16% (functioning) at 26 weeks. Locus of control and fear avoidance beliefs did not add significantly to predicting outcome.
Based on the results of this study we conclude that outcome expectancy, in patients with non-specific sub-acute and chronic neck pain, has additional predictive value for treatment success above and beyond clinical and demographic variables.
Psychological processes, health perceptions and how these factors relate to clinical variables may be important for treatment decision making regarding therapeutic options for individual patients.
心理社会变量的识别可能会影响治疗效果。本研究的目的是前瞻性地检验,对于接受物理治疗或手法治疗的亚急性和慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者,除临床变量(疼痛、功能、总体健康状况、既往颈部疼痛、合并症)外,心理社会变量是否为治疗效果(即总体感知效果、功能和疼痛)的预测因素。心理社会因素包括治疗效果预期和治疗可信度、健康控制点以及恐惧回避信念。
本研究报告了一项基于初级保健的实用随机对照试验的二次分析。在181例患者的基线时测量潜在预测因素,并在7周和26周时测量结果。
分层逻辑回归模型显示,除临床和人口统计学变量外,治疗效果预期可预测治疗成功。预期解释了额外的方差,7周时为6%(疼痛)至17%(功能),26周时为8%(疼痛)至16%(功能)。控制点和恐惧回避信念对预测结果没有显著增加。
基于本研究结果,我们得出结论,对于非特异性亚急性和慢性颈部疼痛患者,治疗效果预期对治疗成功具有超出临床和人口统计学变量的额外预测价值。
心理过程、健康认知以及这些因素与临床变量的关系,对于个体患者治疗方案的治疗决策可能很重要。