• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2012年至2014年间在“强力开端”分娩中心接受护理的生育医疗补助受益人的情况。

Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.

作者信息

Jolles Diana R, Langford Rae, Stapleton Susan, Cesario Sandra, Koci Anne, Alliman Jill

机构信息

Nurse-midwife El Rio Community Health Center, Faculty, Frontier Nursing University, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Birth. 2017 Dec;44(4):298-305. doi: 10.1111/birt.12302. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12302
PMID:28850706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5873276/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variations in care for pregnant women have been reported to affect pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

This study examined data for all 3136 Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled at American Association of Birth Centers (AABC) Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Strong Start sites who gave birth between 2012 and 2014. Using the AABC Perinatal Data Registry, descriptive statistics were used to evaluate socio-behavioral and medical risks, and core perinatal quality outcomes. Next, the 2082 patients coded as low medical risk on admission in labor were analyzed for effective care and preference sensitive care variations. Finally, using binary logistic regression, the associations between selected care processes and cesarean delivery were explored.

RESULTS

Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled at AABC sites had diverse socio-behavioral and medical risk profiles and exceeded quality benchmarks for induction, episiotomy, cesarean, and breastfeeding. Among medically low-risk women, the model demonstrated effective care variations including 82% attendance at prenatal education classes, 99% receiving midwifery-led prenatal care, and 84% with midwifery- attended birth. Patient preferences were adhered to with 83% of women achieving birth at their preferred site of birth, and 95% of women using their preferred infant feeding method. Elective hospitalization in labor was associated with a 4-times greater risk of cesarean birth among medically low-risk childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries.

CONCLUSIONS

The birth center model demonstrates the capability to achieve the triple aims of improved population health, patient experience, and value.

摘要

背景

据报道,孕妇护理方面的差异会影响妊娠结局。

方法

本研究调查了2012年至2014年间在美国分娩中心协会(AABC)医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心“强力开端”项目点登记并分娩的所有3136名医疗补助受益人的数据。利用AABC围产期数据登记处的数据,采用描述性统计方法评估社会行为和医疗风险以及围产期核心质量指标。接下来,对2082名分娩入院时被编码为低医疗风险的患者进行有效护理和偏好敏感护理差异分析。最后,采用二元逻辑回归分析,探讨选定护理流程与剖宫产之间的关联。

结果

在AABC项目点登记的医疗补助受益人具有不同的社会行为和医疗风险特征,在引产、会阴切开术、剖宫产和母乳喂养方面均超过了质量基准。在医疗低风险女性中,该模型显示出有效的护理差异,包括82%的人参加了产前教育课程,99%的人接受了由助产士主导的产前护理,84%的人由助产士接生。患者的偏好得到了遵循,83%的女性在她们首选的分娩地点分娩,95%的女性采用了她们首选的婴儿喂养方式。在医疗低风险的生育医疗补助受益人中,分娩时选择性住院与剖宫产风险高出4倍有关。

结论

分娩中心模式显示出实现改善人群健康、患者体验和价值这三大目标的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6368/5873276/08a97a8b3d52/BIRT-44-298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6368/5873276/08a97a8b3d52/BIRT-44-298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6368/5873276/08a97a8b3d52/BIRT-44-298-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.2012年至2014年间在“强力开端”分娩中心接受护理的生育医疗补助受益人的情况。
Birth. 2017 Dec;44(4):298-305. doi: 10.1111/birt.12302. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
2
Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.生育中心的良好开端:母亲和新生儿的社会人口学特征、护理过程和结局。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):234-243. doi: 10.1111/birt.12433.
3
Strong Start Innovation: Equitable Outcomes Across Public and Privately Insured Clients Receiving Birth Center Care.强力启动创新:公平对待接受生育中心护理的公共保险和私人保险客户的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):746-752. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13439. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
Improving the Experience of Care: Results of the American Association of Birth Centers Strong Start Client Experience of Care Registry Pilot Program, 2015-2016.改善护理体验:美国分娩中心协会“稳健起步”客户护理体验登记试点项目(2015 - 2016年)的结果
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Jan/Mar;34(1):27-37. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000454.
5
Midwifery and Birth Centers Under State Medicaid Programs: Current Limits to Beneficiary Access to a High-Value Model of Care.州医疗补助计划中的助产士和分娩中心:受益人获得高价值护理模式的当前限制。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1091-1113. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12473. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
The birth center model of care: Staffing, business characteristics, and core clinical outcomes.生育中心护理模式:人员配备、业务特征及核心临床结果
Birth. 2023 Dec;50(4):1045-1056. doi: 10.1111/birt.12745. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
7
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.
8
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 15(9):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4.
9
Influence of midwifery presence in United States centers on labor care and outcomes of low-risk parous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study.美国助产士参与的影响集中在低风险经产妇的分娩护理和结局上:安全分娩联盟研究。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):487-499. doi: 10.1111/birt.12405. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
Cesarean Outcomes in US Birth Centers and Collaborating Hospitals: A Cohort Comparison.美国分娩中心及合作医院的剖宫产结局:一项队列比较研究
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):40-48. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12553. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?审视美国分娩中的尊重、自主权和虐待问题:提供者类型和分娩地点是否重要?
Reprod Health. 2023 May 1;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1.
2
Freestanding Birth Centers: An Evidence-Based Option for Birth.独立分娩中心:基于证据的分娩选择。
J Perinat Educ. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):8-13. doi: 10.1891/JPE-2021-0024.
3
Rural resilience: The role of birth centers in the United States.农村韧性:美国生育中心的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Unwarranted Variation in Utilization of Cesarean Birth Among Low-Risk Childbearing Women.低风险育龄妇女剖宫产使用率的不合理差异。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12565.
2
Committee Opinion No. 687: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth.委员会意见 No.687:限制分娩过程干预的方法。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):e20-e28. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001905.
3
Cesarean Outcomes in US Birth Centers and Collaborating Hospitals: A Cohort Comparison.美国分娩中心及合作医院的剖宫产结局:一项队列比较研究
Birth. 2020 Dec;47(4):430-437. doi: 10.1111/birt.12516. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
Next Steps for Transforming Maternity Care: What Strong Start Birth Center Outcomes Tell Us.变革孕产妇护理的下一步举措:强大开端分娩中心的成果启示我们什么。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jul;65(4):462-465. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13084. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
5
Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.生育中心的良好开端:母亲和新生儿的社会人口学特征、护理过程和结局。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):234-243. doi: 10.1111/birt.12433.
6
Trends and state variations in out-of-hospital births in the United States, 2004-2017.美国 2004-2017 年院外分娩的趋势和州际差异。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):279-288. doi: 10.1111/birt.12411. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):40-48. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12553. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
4
Racial Discrimination and Adverse Birth Outcomes: An Integrative Review.种族歧视与不良出生结局:一项综合综述
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Nov;61(6):707-720. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12490. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
Hospital-Affiliated Outpatient Birth Centers: A Possible Model for Helping to Achieve the Triple Aim in Obstetrics.医院附属门诊分娩中心:助力实现产科三重目标的一种可能模式。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 11;316(14):1441-1442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11770.
6
Trends and Characteristics of United States Out-of-Hospital Births 2004-2014: New Information on Risk Status and Access to Care.2004 - 2014年美国院外分娩的趋势与特征:关于风险状况及医疗服务可及性的新信息
Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):116-24. doi: 10.1111/birt.12228. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Maternal Outcomes in Birth Centers: An Integrative Review of the Literature.分娩中心的产妇结局:文献综合综述
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;61(1):21-51. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12356. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
Births: Final Data for 2014.出生情况:2014年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64.
9
Cross-sectional survey of California childbirth hospitals: implications for defining maternal levels of risk-appropriate care.加利福尼亚州分娩医院的横断面调查:对界定孕产妇风险适宜护理水平的启示
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):527.e1-527.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
10
A NICE delivery--the cross-Atlantic divide over treatment intensity in childbirth.一次美妙的分娩——关于分娩治疗强度的跨大西洋分歧。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2181-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1501461.