• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善护理体验:美国分娩中心协会“稳健起步”客户护理体验登记试点项目(2015 - 2016年)的结果

Improving the Experience of Care: Results of the American Association of Birth Centers Strong Start Client Experience of Care Registry Pilot Program, 2015-2016.

作者信息

Stapleton Susan, Wright Jennifer, Jolles Diana R

机构信息

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania (Drs Stapleton and Jolles); Commission for the Accreditation of Birth Centers, Kennebunk, Maine (Dr Stapleton); AABC Perinatal Data Registry, Brattleboro, Vermont (Ms Wright); and El Rio Community Health Center, Frontier Nursing University, Tucson, Arizona (Dr Jolles).

出版信息

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Jan/Mar;34(1):27-37. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000454.

DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000454
PMID:31996642
Abstract

In 2018, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation in the United States (US) released report demonstrating birth centers as the appropriate level of care for most Medicaid beneficiaries. A pilot project conducted at 34 American Association of Birth Centers (AABC) Strong Start sites included 553 beneficiaries between 2015 and 2016 to explore client perceptions of high impact components of care. Participants used the AABC client experience of care registry to report knowledge, values, and experiences of care. Data were linked to more than 300 process and outcome measures within the AABC Perinatal Data Registry™. Descriptive statistics, t tests, χ analysis, and analysis of variance were conducted. Participants demonstrated high engagement with care and trust in pregnancy, birth, and parenting. Beneficiaries achieved their preference for vaginal birth (89.9%) and breastfeeding at discharge through 6 weeks postpartum (91.7% and 87.6%). Beneficiaries reported having time for questions, felt listened to, spoken to in a way they understood, being involved in decision making, and treated with respect. There were no variations in experience of care, cesarean birth, or breastfeeding by race. Medicaid beneficiaries receiving prenatal care at AABC Strong Start sites demonstrated high levels of desired engagement and reported receiving respectful, accessible care and high-quality outcomes. More investment and research using client-reported data registries are warranted as the US works to improve the experience of perinatal care nationwide.

摘要

2018年,美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心创新中心发布报告,表明分娩中心对大多数医疗补助受益人群而言是合适的护理级别。2015年至2016年期间,在美国分娩中心协会(AABC)的34个“强力开端”试点项目点开展了一个试点项目,纳入了553名受益人,以探究客户对高影响力护理要素的看法。参与者使用AABC护理体验登记系统报告护理知识、价值观和体验。数据与AABC围产期数据登记系统™内300多项过程和结果指标相关联。进行了描述性统计、t检验、χ分析和方差分析。参与者对护理表现出高度参与,并对怀孕、分娩和育儿充满信任。受益人实现了阴道分娩的偏好(89.9%),并在产后6周内出院时实现了母乳喂养(91.7%和87.6%)。受益人报告说有时间提问,感觉有人倾听,能以他们理解的方式与之交流,参与决策,并受到尊重。护理体验、剖宫产或母乳喂养在种族方面没有差异。在AABC“强力开端”试点项目点接受产前护理的医疗补助受益人表现出高度的期望参与度,并报告说得到了尊重、便捷的护理和高质量的结果。随着美国努力改善全国围产期护理体验,有必要利用客户报告的数据登记系统进行更多投资和研究。

相似文献

1
Improving the Experience of Care: Results of the American Association of Birth Centers Strong Start Client Experience of Care Registry Pilot Program, 2015-2016.改善护理体验:美国分娩中心协会“稳健起步”客户护理体验登记试点项目(2015 - 2016年)的结果
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Jan/Mar;34(1):27-37. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000454.
2
Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.生育中心的良好开端:母亲和新生儿的社会人口学特征、护理过程和结局。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):234-243. doi: 10.1111/birt.12433.
3
Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.2012年至2014年间在“强力开端”分娩中心接受护理的生育医疗补助受益人的情况。
Birth. 2017 Dec;44(4):298-305. doi: 10.1111/birt.12302. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
4
Strong Start Innovation: Equitable Outcomes Across Public and Privately Insured Clients Receiving Birth Center Care.强力启动创新:公平对待接受生育中心护理的公共保险和私人保险客户的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):746-752. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13439. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Facilitators and Barriers to Healthy Pregnancy Spacing among Medicaid Beneficiaries: Findings from the National Strong Start Initiative.医疗补助受益人群健康妊娠间隔的促进因素和障碍:来自全国强势开端倡议的研究结果。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Mar-Apr;28(2):152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
6
Midwifery and Birth Centers Under State Medicaid Programs: Current Limits to Beneficiary Access to a High-Value Model of Care.州医疗补助计划中的助产士和分娩中心:受益人获得高价值护理模式的当前限制。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1091-1113. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12473. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
What do women in Medicaid say about enhanced prenatal care? Findings from the national Strong Start evaluation.医疗补助计划中的女性对强化产前护理有何看法?来自全国 Strong Start 评估的结果。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):244-252. doi: 10.1111/birt.12431. Epub 2019 May 13.
8
Efforts to Improve Perinatal Outcomes for Women Enrolled in Medicaid.努力改善参加医疗补助计划的妇女的围产期结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;126(2):435-441. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000932.
9
The birth center model of care: Staffing, business characteristics, and core clinical outcomes.生育中心护理模式:人员配备、业务特征及核心临床结果
Birth. 2023 Dec;50(4):1045-1056. doi: 10.1111/birt.12745. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
10
Place of Birth Preferences and Relationship to Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Within the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, 2007-2020.出生地偏好与美国生育中心协会围产期数据注册中心 2007-2020 年母婴结局的关系。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2022;36(2):150-160. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000647.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial Barriers to Expanded Birth Center Access in New Jersey: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.新泽西州扩大分娩中心可及性的经济障碍:一项定性主题分析
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2025 May-Jun;70(3):494-501. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13732. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Strong Start Innovation: Equitable Outcomes Across Public and Privately Insured Clients Receiving Birth Center Care.强力启动创新:公平对待接受生育中心护理的公共保险和私人保险客户的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):746-752. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13439. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
3
Are perinatal quality collaboratives collaborating enough? How including all birth settings can drive needed improvement in the United States maternity care system.
围产期质量协作组织的协作是否足够?纳入所有分娩场所如何推动美国孕产妇护理系统实现必要的改进。
Birth. 2022 Mar;49(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/birt.12600. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
4
Non-physiological and Physiological Delivery Method: Comparison of Maternal Attachment Behaviors and Anxiety.非生理性与生理性分娩方式:产妇依恋行为与焦虑状况的比较
J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar 1;10(1):37-42. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2021.011. eCollection 2021 Mar.