Point Blue Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA.
Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS), Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Dec 15;204(Pt 1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.077. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
Management decisions underpinning availability of ecosystem services and the organisms that provide them in agroecosystems, such as pollinators and pollination services, have emerged as a foremost consideration for both conservation and crop production goals. There is growing evidence that innovative management practices can support diverse pollinators and increase crop pollination. However, there is also considerable debate regarding factors that support adoption of these innovative practices. This study investigated pollination management practices and related knowledge systems in a major crop producing region of southwest Michigan in the United States, where 367 growers were surveyed to evaluate adoption of three innovative practices that are at various stages of adoption. The goals of this quantitative, social survey were to investigate grower experience with concerns and benefits associated with each practice, as well as the influence of grower networks, which are comprised of contacts that reflect potential pathways for social and technical learning. The results demonstrated that 17% of growers adopted combinations of bees (e.g. honey bees, Apis mellifera, with other species), representing an innovation in use by early adopters; 49% of growers adopted flowering cover crops, an innovation in use by the early majority 55% of growers retained permanent habitat for pollinators, an innovation in use by the late majority. Not all growers adopted innovative practices. We found that growers' personal experience with potential benefits and concerns related to the management practices had significant positive and negative relationships, respectively, with adoption of all three innovations. The influence of these communication links likely has different levels of importance, depending on the stage of the adoption that a practice is experiencing in the agricultural community. Social learning was positively associated with adopting the use of combinations of bees, highlighting the potentially critical roles of peer-to-peer networks and social learning in supporting early stages of adoption of innovations. Engaging with grower networks and understanding grower experience with benefits and concerns associated with innovative practices is needed to inform outreach, extension, and policy efforts designed to stimulate management innovations in agroecosystems.
在农业生态系统中,管理决策是支撑生态系统服务及其提供服务的生物(如传粉者和传粉服务)可用性的基础,这些决策已成为保护和作物生产目标的首要考虑因素。越来越多的证据表明,创新的管理实践可以支持多样化的传粉者并增加作物传粉。然而,对于支持采用这些创新实践的因素也存在相当大的争议。本研究调查了美国密歇根州西南部一个主要作物产区的传粉管理实践和相关知识体系,对 367 名种植者进行了调查,以评估三种不同采用阶段的创新实践的采用情况。这项定量社会调查的目的是调查种植者对与每种实践相关的关注和收益的经验,以及种植者网络的影响,该网络由反映社会和技术学习潜在途径的联系人组成。结果表明,17%的种植者采用了蜜蜂(如 Apis mellifera)与其他物种的组合,这代表了早期采用者在用途上的创新;49%的种植者采用了开花覆盖作物,这是早期多数采用者在用途上的创新;55%的种植者保留了传粉媒介的永久栖息地,这是晚期多数采用者在用途上的创新。并非所有种植者都采用了创新实践。我们发现,种植者个人对与管理实践相关的潜在收益和关注的经验与对所有三种创新的采用分别存在显著的正相关和负相关关系。这些沟通联系的影响可能因实践在农业社区中的采用阶段而异,具有不同程度的重要性。社会学习与采用蜜蜂组合的使用呈正相关,突出了同行网络和社会学习在支持创新采用的早期阶段的潜在关键作用。需要与种植者网络接触并了解种植者对创新实践相关收益和关注的经验,以便为旨在刺激农业生态系统管理创新的推广、扩展和政策工作提供信息。