• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A study on the equality and benefit of China's national health care system.中国国家医疗保障制度的公平性和效益研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 29;16(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4.
2
Has equity in government subsidy on healthcare improved in China? Evidence from the China's National Health Services Survey.中国政府医疗补贴的公平性有所改善吗?来自中国国家卫生服务调查的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 10;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0516-z.
3
The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.中国城乡医保整合下住院医疗净效益的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 22;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0891-0.
4
Impact of Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance integration on individual social fairness perceptions: evidence from rural China.城乡居民基本医疗保险整合对个体社会公平感的影响:来自中国农村的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1408146. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1408146. eCollection 2024.
5
Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study.评估中国山东省医疗服务中政府卫生补贴的效益公平性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 18;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0775-3.
6
China's rural public health system performance: a cross-sectional study.中国农村公共卫生系统绩效评估:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083822. eCollection 2013.
7
Equity in patient experiences of primary care in community health centers using primary care assessment tool: a comparison of rural-to-urban migrants and urban locals in Guangdong, China.利用初级保健评估工具评估社区卫生中心中患者的初级保健体验中的公平性:对中国广东的农村到城市移民和城市本地居民的比较。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 27;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0758-4.
8
All-cause mortality rate in China: do residents in economically developed regions have better health?中国全因死亡率:经济发达地区居民的健康状况更好吗?
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jan 21;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1128-6.
9
Rural-urban disparities in the utilization of mental health inpatient services in China: the role of health insurance.中国城乡在心理健康住院服务利用方面的差异:医疗保险的作用。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Dec;18(4):377-393. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9238-z. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Rural-urban differences in health outcomes, healthcare use, and expenditures among older adults under universal health insurance in China.中国全民健康保险下老年人健康结果、医疗保健使用和支出的城乡差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0240194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240194. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on regional disparities and influencing factors of public health service supply in China from the perspective of fairness.基于公平性视角的中国公共卫生服务供给区域差异及影响因素研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1172. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13292-6.
2
How do Chinese people perceive their healthcare system? Trends and determinants of public satisfaction and perceived fairness, 2006-2019.中国人如何看待他们的医疗体系?2006-2019 年公众满意度和感知公平性的趋势和决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07413-0.
3
Effect of medical insurance and family financial risk on healthcare utilisation by patients with chronic diseases in China: a cross-sectional study.医疗保险和家庭财务风险对中国慢性病患者医疗服务利用的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030799.
4
Hospitalization Services Utilization Between Permanent and Migrant Females in Underdeveloped Rural Regions and Contributing Factors-A Five-Time Data Collection and Analysis.欠发达农村地区永久性和移民女性的住院服务利用情况及影响因素——五次数据收集与分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 14;16(18):3419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183419.
5
Cardiovascular surgery experience does not significantly improve patients' response to stroke.心血管手术经验并不能显著改善患者对中风的反应。
Brain Behav. 2019 Oct;9(10):e01405. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1405. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
6
Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China.患者为何偏爱高级别医疗机构:一项在中国农村和城市地区运用焦点小组的定性研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Sep 19;3(5):e000854. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000854. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes and equity in use of maternal health care in China: from 1991 to 2003.中国孕产妇保健利用的变化和公平性:1991 年至 2003 年。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Feb;16(2):501-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0773-1.
2
Measuring patient satisfaction: a case study to improve quality of care at public health facilities.衡量患者满意度:一项提高公共卫生机构护理质量的案例研究。
Indian J Community Med. 2010 Jan;35(1):52-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.62554.
3
Explaining urban-rural health disparities in China.解析中国城乡健康差异
Med Care. 2009 Dec;47(12):1209-16. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181adcc32.
4
Rural and urban disparity in health services utilization in China.中国城乡卫生服务利用的差异。
Med Care. 2007 Aug;45(8):767-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180618b9a.
5
Exploring quality perceptions of health care operations: a study of public hospitals of Mauritius.探索对医疗保健运营的质量认知:毛里求斯公立医院研究
J Hosp Mark Public Relations. 2006;16(1-2):89-111. doi: 10.1300/J375v16n01_07.
6
[Evaluation of patients' satisfaction in relation to private or public health care providers].[关于私立或公立医疗服务提供者的患者满意度评估]
Wiad Lek. 2002;55 Suppl 1:313-20.
7
The inequality of maternal health care in urban sub-Saharan Africa in the 1990s.20世纪90年代撒哈拉以南非洲城市地区孕产妇保健的不平等状况。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2003 Nov;57(3):347-66. doi: 10.1080/0032472032000137853.
8
Perceptions of health care quality in Central America.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Feb;15(1):67-71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.67.
9
Modernization and health care in contemporary China.当代中国的现代化与医疗保健
Health Place. 1998 Jun;4(2):125-39. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8292(98)00005-7.
10
Equity in health and health care: the Chinese experience.卫生与医疗保健公平性:中国经验
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Nov;49(10):1349-56. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00207-5.

中国国家医疗保障制度的公平性和效益研究。

A study on the equality and benefit of China's national health care system.

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Northwest University, 1 Xuefu Road, Chang'an District, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710127, China.

School of Politics and Administration, Xianyang Normal University, Wenlin Road, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 29;16(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4
PMID:28851371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5575878/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study is designed to evaluate whether the benefit which the residents received from the national health care system is equal in China. The perceived equality and benefit are used to measure the personal status of health care system, health status. This study examines variations in perceived equality and benefit of the national health care system between urban and rural residents from five cities of China and assessed their determinants.

METHODS

One thousand one hundred ninty eight residents were selected from a random survey among five nationally representative cities. The research characterizes perceptions into four population groupings based on a binary assessment of survey scores: high equality & high benefit; low equality & low benefit; high equality & low benefit; and low equality & high benefit.

RESULTS

The distribution of the four groups above is 30.4%, 43.0%, 4.6% and 22.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the type of health insurance, educational background, occupation, geographic regions, changes in health status and other factors have significant impacts on perceived equality and benefit derived from the health care system.

CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrate wide variations in perceptions of equality and benefit between urban and rural residents and across population characteristics, leading to a perceived lack of fairness in benefits and accessibility. Opportunities exist for policy interventions that are targeted to eliminate perceived differences and promote greater equality in access to health care.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估中国居民从国家医疗保健系统中获得的利益是否平等。感知的公平性和收益用于衡量医疗保健系统的个人地位和健康状况。本研究考察了中国五个城市城乡居民对国家医疗保健系统的感知公平性和收益的差异,并评估了其决定因素。

方法

从全国五个具有代表性的城市中随机抽取 1198 名居民进行了调查。该研究根据调查分数的二元评估,将感知划分为四个人群分组:高公平高收益;低公平低收益;高公平低收益;低公平高收益。

结果

上述四个组的分布分别为 30.4%、43.0%、4.6%和 22.0%。同时,医疗保险类型、教育背景、职业、地理位置、健康状况变化等因素对感知公平性和从医疗保健系统中获得的收益有显著影响。

结论

研究结果表明,城乡居民和不同人口特征之间对公平性和收益的感知存在广泛差异,导致对收益和可及性的公平性缺乏感知。存在政策干预的机会,可以针对消除感知差异并促进更公平地获得医疗保健的目标进行干预。