• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支具治疗时皮拉尼评分的意义——对识别矫正马蹄内翻足的启示

Significance Of Pirani Score at Bracing-Implications for Recognizing A Corrected Clubfoot.

作者信息

Khan Mansoor Ali, Chinoy Muhammad Amin, Moosa Rida, Ahmed Syed Kamran

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics The Indus Hospital.

出版信息

Iowa Orthop J. 2017;37:151-156.

PMID:28852350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508266/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of clubfoot treatment by Ponseti method is to achieve a corrected foot, with at least 15° dorsiflexion and 70° abduction, and fit comfortably into a brace at the recommended setting. This study aimed to acknowledge the validity and reliability of the Pirani scoring system, while investigating if a corrected clubfoot has a Pirani score of zero. The study hypothesized that a corrected clubfoot may or may not have a Pirani score of zero.

METHODS

706 patients with clubfoot were treated by Ponseti's method of weekly manipulations and casting, from November 2011 to May 2016, at a tertiary care hospital, making a total of 1055 feet. All data was entered into the International Clubfoot Network Database, along with Pirani scoring. Tenotomy was performed in eligible patients.

RESULTS

The mean Pirani score at the end of treatment phase of casting and initiation of the maintenance phase of bracing for the right foot was 1.1 (SD=0.55) and left foot was 1.2 (SD=0.58). These feet not only fit the criteria of a corrected clubfoot, 70° abduction and 15° dorsiflexion, but also fit well in a foot abduction brace. Of the 1055 diagnosed Clubfeet, 643 required tenotomy (60.9%).

CONCLUSION

The study shows that the affected foot does not need to have a Pirani score of zero to be considered a corrected foot. Pirani score is an excellent tool used over the years to evaluate clubfoot. Pirani score does not assess adequately the transition from the treatment phase of casting to the maintenance phase of bracing. The use of the International Clubfoot Database-Treatment visit form, including all components of clubfoot and the Pirani score, provides a clear understanding of whether the patient has achieved foot correction or not. .

摘要

背景

庞塞蒂方法治疗马蹄内翻足的目的是使足部得到矫正,背屈至少15°,外展70°,并能舒适地适配于推荐设置的支具。本研究旨在确认皮拉尼评分系统的有效性和可靠性,同时调查矫正后的马蹄内翻足皮拉尼评分是否为零。该研究假设矫正后的马蹄内翻足皮拉尼评分可能为零,也可能不为零。

方法

2011年11月至2016年5月,在一家三级护理医院,706例马蹄内翻足患者接受了庞塞蒂每周手法治疗和石膏固定方法,共计1055只脚。所有数据以及皮拉尼评分均录入国际马蹄内翻足网络数据库。符合条件的患者接受了跟腱切断术。

结果

在石膏固定治疗阶段结束和开始支具维持阶段时,右脚的平均皮拉尼评分为1.1(标准差=0.55),左脚为1.2(标准差=0.58)。这些足部不仅符合矫正马蹄内翻足的标准,即外展70°和背屈15°,而且能很好地适配足部外展支具。在1055例诊断为马蹄内翻足的病例中,643例需要进行跟腱切断术(60.9%)。

结论

该研究表明,患足皮拉尼评分不为零也可被视为矫正足。多年来,皮拉尼评分一直是评估马蹄内翻足的优秀工具。皮拉尼评分不能充分评估从石膏固定治疗阶段到支具维持阶段的过渡情况。使用国际马蹄内翻足数据库-治疗访视表,包括马蹄内翻足的所有组成部分和皮拉尼评分,能清楚了解患者是否实现了足部矫正。

相似文献

1
Significance Of Pirani Score at Bracing-Implications for Recognizing A Corrected Clubfoot.支具治疗时皮拉尼评分的意义——对识别矫正马蹄内翻足的启示
Iowa Orthop J. 2017;37:151-156.
2
Use of the Pirani score in monitoring progression of correction and in guiding indications for tenotomy in the Ponseti method: Are we coming to the same decisions?在庞塞蒂方法中使用皮拉尼评分监测矫正进展并指导肌腱切断术的指征:我们的决策是否一致?
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 May-Aug;25(2):2309499017713916. doi: 10.1177/2309499017713916.
3
The Heel Pad in Congenital Idiopathic Clubfoot: Implications of Empty Heel for Clinical Severity Assessment.先天性特发性马蹄内翻足中的足跟垫:足跟空虚对临床严重程度评估的影响。
Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:169-74.
4
Multiple tenotomies after Ponseti method for management of severe rigid clubfoot.在庞塞蒂方法治疗重度僵硬型马蹄内翻足后进行多次肌腱切断术。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;51(2):156-60. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.038. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
5
Comparison of Dimeglio and Pirani score in predicting number of casts and need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.使用庞塞蒂方法矫正马蹄足时,比较迪梅廖评分和皮拉尼评分在预测石膏固定次数及跟腱切断需求方面的作用。
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2429-2436. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3873-3. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Does initial Pirani score and age influence number of Ponseti casts in children?初始的皮拉尼评分和年龄会影响儿童进行庞塞蒂石膏固定的次数吗?
Int Orthop. 2014 Mar;38(3):569-72. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2155-3. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
7
Comparison of Ponseti and Kite's method of treatment for idiopathic clubfoot.庞塞蒂法与凯特法治疗特发性马蹄内翻足的比较。
Indian J Orthop. 2010 Apr;44(2):202-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.61941.
8
Are bilateral idiopathic clubfeet more severe than unilateral feet? A severity and treatment analysis.双侧特发性马蹄内翻足比单侧的更严重吗?一项严重程度及治疗分析。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(2):2309499018772364. doi: 10.1177/2309499018772364.
9
Mid-term results of Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot--(a study of 67 clubfeet with mean five year follow-up).潘塞提(Ponseti)方法治疗先天性特发性马蹄内翻足的中期疗效——(67 例马蹄内翻足平均随访 5 年的研究)。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jan 12;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-3.
10
Prediction of Number of Casts and Need of Tenotomy Using Pirani Score in the Management of Clubfoot.在马蹄内翻足治疗中使用皮拉尼评分预测石膏固定次数及肌腱切断需求
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jul;30(5):e477-e481. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005571.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial clubfoot treatment in Sweden from 2016 to 2019: A national register study.2016 年至 2019 年瑞典初次治疗先天性马蹄内翻足:全国注册研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0305900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305900. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing the Influence of Age, Weight, and Pirani Score on the Number of Casts During the Initial Phase of Clubfoot Treatment Using the Ponseti Method: A Prospective Study.评估年龄、体重和皮拉尼评分对使用庞塞蒂方法进行马蹄内翻足治疗初始阶段石膏固定次数的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Apr 20;58(6):687-695. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01142-2. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
How to Cope with the Ponseti Method for Clubfoot: The Families' Standpoint.如何应对先天性马蹄内翻足的庞塞蒂方法:家庭视角
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;9(8):1134. doi: 10.3390/children9081134.
4
Talipes equinovarus or Clubfoot: A review of study approaches, management and trends in Pakistan.马蹄内翻足:巴基斯坦的研究方法、治疗与趋势综述
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Sep-Oct;36(6):1414-1420. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.6.2514.
5
Ten year challenge with Ponseti method for clubfoot: our experience.采用庞塞蒂方法治疗马蹄内翻足的十年挑战:我们的经验
Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 5;90(12-S):127-130. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8831.
6
Ponseti Technique for the Management of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus in a Rural Set-Up in India: Experience of 356 Patients.印度农村地区先天性马蹄内翻足的庞塞蒂治疗技术:356例患者的经验
Children (Basel). 2018 Apr 10;5(4):49. doi: 10.3390/children5040049.
7
Developing a Three-Dimensional (3D) Assessment Method for Clubfoot-A Study Protocol.开发一种用于马蹄内翻足的三维(3D)评估方法——一项研究方案
Front Physiol. 2018 Jan 4;8:1098. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01098. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison between orthopedic surgeon and allied health worker in pirani score.骨科医生与专职医疗人员在皮拉尼评分方面的比较。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Dec;64(12 Suppl 2):S127-30.
2
Influence of Age, Weight, and Pirani Score on the Number of Castings in the Early Phase of Clubfoot Treatment using Ponseti Method.年龄、体重和皮拉尼评分对使用庞塞蒂方法治疗马蹄内翻足早期阶段石膏固定次数的影响。
Malays J Med Sci. 2014 Mar;21(2):40-3.
3
Long-term results of comprehensive clubfoot release versus the Ponseti method: which is better?综合足踝松解与 Ponseti 方法治疗马蹄内翻足的长期疗效比较:哪种方法更好?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Apr;472(4):1281-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3386-8. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
Comparison of the short-term and long-term results of the Ponseti method in the treatment of idiopathic pes equinovarus.探讨潘塞提(Ponseti)方法治疗特发性马蹄内翻足的短期和长期结果。
Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1821-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2033-z. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).成人疼痛测量方法:疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS疼痛)、疼痛数字评定量表(NRS疼痛)、麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)、简化麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)、慢性疼痛分级量表(CPGS)、简短健康调查36项身体疼痛量表(SF-36 BPS)以及间歇性和持续性骨关节炎疼痛测量量表(ICOAP)。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
6
Comparison of Ponseti and Kite's method of treatment for idiopathic clubfoot.庞塞蒂法与凯特法治疗特发性马蹄内翻足的比较。
Indian J Orthop. 2010 Apr;44(2):202-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.61941.
7
Clubfoot: etiology and treatment.马蹄内翻足:病因与治疗
Indian J Orthop. 2008 Jan;42(1):22-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.38576.
8
Comparison of Ponseti versus surgical treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: a short-term preliminary report.先天性马蹄内翻足的Ponseti疗法与手术治疗对比:短期初步报告
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2668-76. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0819-5. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
9
Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: minimum 5-year followup.庞塞蒂疗法治疗特发性马蹄内翻足:至少5年随访
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May;467(5):1263-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0683-8. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
10
The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method.皮拉尼评分系统在庞塞蒂方法治疗马蹄内翻足中的作用。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Aug;88(8):1082-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17482.