Pantelic Marija, Boyes Mark, Cluver Lucie, Meinck Franziska
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance, Brighton, UK.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Aug 21;20(1):21771. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21771.
Internalized HIV stigma is a key risk factor for negative outcomes amongst adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV), including non-adherence to anti-retroviral treatment, loss-to-follow-up and morbidity. This study tested a theoretical model of multi-level risk pathways to internalized HIV stigma among South African ALHIV.
From 2013 to 2015, a survey using otal population sampling of ALHIV who had ever initiated anti-retroviral treatment (ART) in 53 public health facilities in the Eastern Cape, South Africa was conducted. Community-tracing ensured inclusion of ALHIV who were defaulting from ART or lost to follow-up. 90.1% of eligible ALHIV were interviewed ( = 1060, 55% female, mean age = 13.8, 21% living in rural locations). HIV stigma mechanisms (internalized, enacted, and anticipated), HIV-related disability, violence victimization (physical, emotional, sexual abuse, bullying victimization) were assessed using well-validated self-report measures. Structural equation modelling was used to test a theoretically informed model of risk pathways from HIV-related disability to internalized HIV stigma. The model controlled for age, gender and urban/rural address.
Prevalence of internalized HIV stigma was 26.5%. As hypothesized, significant associations between internalized stigma and anticipated stigma, as well as depression were obtained. Unexpectedly, HIV-related disability, victimization, and enacted stigma were not directly associated with internalized stigma. Instead significant pathways were identified via anticipated HIV stigma and depression. The model fitted the data well (RMSEA = .023; CFI = .94; TLI = .95; WRMR = 1.070).
These findings highlight the complicated nature of internalized HIV stigma. Whilst it is seemingly a psychological process, indirect pathways suggest multi-level mechanisms leading to internalized HIV stigma. Findings suggest that protection from violence within homes, communities and schools may interrupt risk pathways from HIV-related health problems to psychological distress and internalized HIV stigma. This highlights the potential for interventions that do not explicitly target adolescents living with HIV but are sensitive to their needs.
内化的艾滋病毒污名是感染艾滋病毒的青少年(ALHIV)出现负面结果的关键风险因素,包括不坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗、失访和发病。本研究测试了南非感染艾滋病毒青少年内化艾滋病毒污名的多层次风险途径理论模型。
2013年至2015年,对南非东开普省53家公共卫生机构中曾开始接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的感染艾滋病毒青少年进行了全人群抽样调查。社区追踪确保纳入了那些未坚持接受抗逆转录病毒治疗或失访的感染艾滋病毒青少年。90.1%符合条件的感染艾滋病毒青少年接受了访谈(n = 1060,55%为女性,平均年龄 = 13.8岁,21%生活在农村地区)。使用经过充分验证的自我报告量表评估了艾滋病毒污名机制(内化、表现出的和预期的)、与艾滋病毒相关的残疾、暴力受害情况(身体、情感、性虐待、欺凌受害)。采用结构方程模型来测试一个从与艾滋病毒相关的残疾到内化艾滋病毒污名的理论知情风险途径模型。该模型对年龄、性别和城乡住址进行了控制。
内化艾滋病毒污名的患病率为26.5%。正如所假设的,在内化污名与预期污名以及抑郁之间获得了显著关联。出乎意料的是,与艾滋病毒相关的残疾、受害情况和表现出的污名与内化污名没有直接关联。相反,通过预期的艾滋病毒污名和抑郁确定了显著的途径。该模型与数据拟合良好(RMSEA = 0.023;CFI = 0.94;TLI = 0.95;WRMR = 1.070)。
这些发现凸显了内化艾滋病毒污名的复杂性质。虽然它看似是一个心理过程,但间接途径表明导致内化艾滋病毒污名的是多层次机制。研究结果表明,在家中、社区和学校免受暴力侵害可能会中断从与艾滋病毒相关的健康问题到心理困扰和内化艾滋病毒污名的风险途径。这凸显了那些没有明确针对感染艾滋病毒青少年但对其需求敏感的干预措施的潜力。