非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中利伐沙班与其他口服抗凝药物的依从性比较。
Adherence to Rivaroxaban Compared with Other Oral Anticoagulant Agents Among Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
机构信息
1 Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland.
2 Janssen Scientific Affairs, Titusville, New Jersey.
出版信息
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Sep;23(9):980-988. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.9.980.
BACKGROUND
Adherence to oral anticoagulant (OAC) agents is important for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to prevent potentially severe adverse events.
OBJECTIVE
To compare real-world adherence rates and time to discontinuation for rivaroxaban versus other OACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and warfarin) among patients with NVAF using claims-based data.
METHODS
Health care claims from the IMS Health Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims database (July 2012-June 2015) were analyzed. Adherence rate was defined as the percentage of patients with proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 0.80 and ≥ 0.90. Discontinuation was defined as a gap of more than 30 days between the end of a dispensing days of supply and the start date of the next fill, if any. Patients were included if they had ≥ 2 dispensings of rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, or warfarin at least 180 days apart (the first was considered the index date), had > 60 days of supply, had ≥ 6 months of pre-index eligibility, had ≥ 1 atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis pre-index or at index date, and had no valvular involvement. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate adherence to OAC therapy, while a Cox model was used to compare time to discontinuation; both models adjusted for baseline confounders.
RESULTS
A total of 13,645 rivaroxaban, 6,304 apixaban, 3,360 dabigatran, and 13,366 warfarin patients were identified. A significantly higher proportion of rivaroxaban users (80.1%) was adherent to therapy (PDC ≥ 0.80 at 6 months) versus apixaban (75.8%), dabigatran (69.2%), and warfarin users (64.5%). After adjustment, the proportion of patients adherent to therapy remained significantly higher for rivaroxaban users versus apixaban (absolute difference [AD] = 5.8%), dabigatran (AD = 9.5%), and warfarin users (AD = 13.6%; all P < 0.001). More pronounced differences were found with a PDC ≥0.90. In addition, rivaroxaban users were significantly less likely to discontinue therapy compared with other OACs after adjustments (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Among NVAF patients, rivaroxaban was associated with significantly higher adherence rates relative to other OACs whether using either a PDC of > 0.80 or > 0.90. Such differences in adherence could translate into improved patient outcomes and lower health care costs.
DISCLOSURES
This research was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs. Ashton, Crivera, and Schein are employees and stockholders of Janssen Scientific Affairs. Laliberté, Germain, Wynant, and Lefebvre are employees of Analysis Group, a consulting company that received research grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs in connection with this study. McHorney is an employee of Evidera, a consulting company that received research grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs in connection with this study. Peterson received research grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs in connection with this study. All authors contributed to concept and design. The data were collected by Germain, Wynant, Laliberté, and Lefebvre and interpreted primarily by McHorney and Peterson, with the assistance of Lefebvre, Laliberté, Ashton, Crivera, and Schein. The manuscript was written primarily by Laliberté, Germain, and Lefebvre, with the assistance of Wynant. Revisions were made primarily by Ashton, Crivera, McHorney, Schein, and Peterson.
背景
对于非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者来说,坚持服用口服抗凝药物(OAC)非常重要,这有助于预防潜在的严重不良事件。
目的
利用基于理赔的数据库,比较 NVAF 患者使用利伐沙班与其他 OAC(阿哌沙班、达比加群和华法林)的真实世界依从率和停药时间。
方法
分析 IMS Health Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims 数据库(2012 年 7 月至 2015 年 6 月)中的健康理赔数据。依从率定义为比例达标天数(PDC)≥0.80 和≥0.90 的患者比例。停药定义为,如果上次配药结束与下次配药开始之间的间隔超过 30 天,且下次配药仍在进行中(如果有)。如果患者至少相隔 180 天(首次为索引日期)有≥2 次利伐沙班、阿哌沙班、达比加群或华法林的配药,且每次配药的供应天数≥60 天,且有≥6 个月的索引前资格,有≥1 次索引前或索引日期的心房颤动(AF)诊断,且没有瓣膜参与,则纳入患者。采用逻辑回归模型评估 OAC 治疗的依从性,采用 Cox 模型比较停药时间;两种模型均根据基线混杂因素进行调整。
结果
共纳入 13645 名利伐沙班、6304 名阿哌沙班、3360 名达比加群和 13366 名华法林患者。与阿哌沙班(75.8%)、达比加群(69.2%)和华法林患者(64.5%)相比,利伐沙班使用者(80.1%)的治疗依从性(6 个月时 PDC≥0.80)显著更高。调整后,与阿哌沙班(绝对差值[AD] = 5.8%)、达比加群(AD = 9.5%)和华法林(AD = 13.6%;均 P<0.001)相比,利伐沙班使用者的治疗依从性仍显著更高。使用 PDC≥0.90 时,差异更加显著。此外,调整后利伐沙班使用者停药的可能性明显低于其他 OAC(均 P<0.05)。
结论
在 NVAF 患者中,与其他 OAC 相比,利伐沙班的依从率更高,无论使用 PDC>0.80 还是>0.90。这种依从性差异可能转化为更好的患者结局和更低的医疗保健成本。
披露
这项研究由杨森科学事务公司资助。Ashton、Crivera 和 Schein 是杨森科学事务公司的员工和股东。Laliberté、Germain、Wynant 和 Lefebvre 是 Analysis Group 的员工,Analysis Group 是一家咨询公司,与这项研究一起从杨森科学事务公司获得了研究资助。McHorney 是 Evidera 的员工,Evidera 是一家咨询公司,与这项研究一起从杨森科学事务公司获得了研究资助。Peterson 与这项研究一起从杨森科学事务公司获得了研究资助。所有作者都对概念和设计做出了贡献。数据由 Germain、Wynant、Laliberté 和 Lefebvre 收集,主要由 McHorney 和 Peterson 解释,Lefebvre、Laliberté、Ashton、Crivera 和 Schein 提供了协助。手稿主要由 Laliberté、Germain 和 Lefebvre 撰写,Wynant 提供了协助。修订主要由 Ashton、Crivera、McHorney、Schein 和 Peterson 进行。