1 QuintilesIMS, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania.
2 Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Sep;23(9):936-942. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.9.936.
Nonadherence to statin medications is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and poses a challenge to lipid management in patients who are at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Numerous studies have examined statin adherence based on administrative claims data; however, these data may underestimate statin use in patients who participate in generic drug discount programs or who have alternative coverage.
To estimate the proportion of patients with missing statin claims in a claims database and determine how missing claims affect commonly used utilization metrics.
This retrospective cohort study used pharmacy data from the PharMetrics Plus (P+) claims dataset linked to the IMS longitudinal pharmacy point-of-sale prescription database (LRx) from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014. Eligible patients were represented in the P+ and LRx datasets, had ≥1 claim for a statin (index claim) in either database, and had ≥ 24 months of continuous enrollment in P+. Patients were linked between P+ and LRx using a deterministic method. Duplicate claims between LRx and P+ were removed to produce a new dataset comprised of P+ claims augmented with LRx claims. Statin use was then compared between P+ and the augmented P+ dataset. Utilization metrics that were evaluated included percentage of patients with ≥ 1 missing statin claim over 12 months in P+; the number of patients misclassified as new users in P+; the number of patients misclassified as nonstatin users in P+; the change in 12-month medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC) in P+; the comparison between P+ and LRx of classifications of statin treatment patterns (statin intensity and patients with treatment modifications); and the payment status for missing statin claims.
Data from 965,785 patients with statin claims in P+ were analyzed (mean age 56.6 years; 57% male). In P+, 20.1% had ≥ 1 missing statin claim post-index; 13.7% were misclassified as nonstatin users; and 14.9% were misclassified as new statin users. MPR was higher in the augmented P+ dataset versus the P+ dataset alone for all patients (79.4% vs. 76.7%, P < 0.001) and new users (61.4% vs. 58.7%, P < 0.001). Similarly, mean PDC was higher in the P+ dataset augmented with LRx versus the P+ dataset alone for all patients (76.0% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.001) and new users (58.5% vs. 56.5%, P < 0.001). Most patients received moderate-intensity statins; few changes in dose, intensity, or discontinuation of statins were observed when the P+ dataset was augmented. The most common reasons for missing data were payment by an alternate third-party program (66.3%) and use of cash, coupon, or discount cards (18.7%).
Augmenting commercial claims data with point-of-sale data provides a more accurate assessment of statin use than claims data alone.
This study was funded by Amgen, which contributed to data interpretation and manuscript preparation. Wade, Hill, and De are employees of QuintilesIMS, which received funding from Amgen for work on this study. Patel and Harrison are employees of Amgen and own Amgen stock/stock options. Study concept and design were contributed by Wade, Hill, Patel, and Harrison. De took the lead in data collection, along with the other authors, and all authors contributed to data analysis. The manuscript was written and revised by all the authors.
他汀类药物不依从与心血管疾病风险增加相关,对有发生动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险的患者的脂质管理构成挑战。许多研究已经根据行政索赔数据来评估他汀类药物的依从性;然而,这些数据可能会低估参与仿制药折扣计划或有替代保险的患者的他汀类药物使用情况。
估计索赔数据库中他汀类药物缺失索赔的患者比例,并确定缺失索赔如何影响常用的使用情况指标。
本回顾性队列研究使用 PharMetrics Plus(P+)索赔数据集的药房数据,该数据与 IMS 纵向药房销售点处方数据库(LRx)相关联,时间范围为 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日。在 P+和 LRx 数据集中都有代表性的合格患者,在两个数据库中都有≥1 次他汀类药物(索引索赔)的索赔,并且在 P+中连续参保≥24 个月。使用确定性方法将 P+和 LRx 中的患者进行链接。为了生成一个新数据集,从 LRx 和 P+中删除了重复的索赔。然后,在 P+中比较了他汀类药物的使用情况。评估的使用情况指标包括:P+中在 12 个月内有≥1 次他汀类药物缺失索赔的患者比例;在 P+中被错误归类为新用户的患者数量;在 P+中被错误归类为非他汀类药物使用者的患者数量;P+中 12 个月药物占有比(MPR)和比例的变化有遮蔽(PDC);P+与 LRx 之间他汀类药物治疗模式(他汀类药物强度和有治疗修改的患者)的分类比较;以及缺失他汀类药物索赔的支付状态。
分析了来自 PharMetrics Plus(P+)中 965785 名有他汀类药物索赔的患者的数据(平均年龄 56.6 岁;57%为男性)。在 P+中,20.1%的患者在索引后有≥1 次他汀类药物缺失索赔;13.7%被错误归类为非他汀类药物使用者;14.9%被错误归类为新的他汀类药物使用者。对于所有患者(79.4%比 76.7%,P<0.001)和新用户(61.4%比 58.7%,P<0.001),在 P+中添加 LRx 后的 MPR 更高。同样,对于所有患者(76.0%比 74.0%,P<0.001)和新用户(58.5%比 56.5%,P<0.001),在 P+中添加 LRx 后的平均 PDC 更高。大多数患者接受中等强度的他汀类药物治疗;当 P+数据集被扩充时,观察到剂量、强度或停止使用他汀类药物的变化很少。数据缺失的最常见原因是由替代第三方计划支付(66.3%)和使用现金、优惠券或折扣卡(18.7%)。
用销售点数据扩充商业索赔数据比仅使用索赔数据更能准确评估他汀类药物的使用情况。
本研究由安进公司资助,该公司对数据解释和手稿准备做出了贡献。Wade、Hill 和 De 是 QuintilesIMS 的员工,该公司因这项研究从安进公司获得了资金。Patel 和 Harrison 是安进公司的员工,拥有安进公司的股票/股票期权。研究概念和设计由 Wade、Hill、Patel 和 Harrison 提出。De 与其他作者一起主导了数据收集,所有作者都对数据分析做出了贡献。该手稿由所有作者撰写和修订。