• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能动态临床检查表提高了重症监护病房的检查表依从性。

Intelligent dynamic clinical checklists improved checklist compliance in the intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine.

Intensive Care Unit, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):231-238. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex129.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aex129
PMID:28854530
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Checklists can reduce medical errors. However, the effectiveness of checklists is hampered by lack of acceptance and compliance. Recently, a new type of checklist with dynamic properties has been created to provide more specific checklist items for each individual patient. Our purpose in this simulation-based study was to investigate a newly developed intelligent dynamic clinical checklist (DCC) for the intensive care unit (ICU) ward round.

METHODS

Eligible clinicians were invited to participate as volunteers. Highest achievable scores were established for six typical ICU scenarios to determine which items must be checked. The participants compared the DCC with the local standard of care. The primary outcomes were the caregiver satisfaction score and the percentages of checked items overall and of critical items requiring a direct intervention.

RESULTS

In total, 20 participants were included, who performed 116 scenarios. The median percentage of checked items was 100.0% with the DCC and 73.6% for the scenarios completed with local standard of care ( P <0.001). Critical items remained unchecked in 23.1% of the scenarios performed with local standard of care and 0.0% of the scenarios where the DCC was available ( P <0.001). The mean satisfaction score of the DCC was 4.13 out of 5.

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation study indicates that an intelligent DCC significantly increases compliance with best practice by reducing the percentage of unchecked items during ICU ward rounds, while the user satisfaction rate remains high. Real-life clinical research is required to evaluate this new type of checklist further.

摘要

背景

清单可以减少医疗错误。然而,由于缺乏接受度和依从性,清单的有效性受到了阻碍。最近,一种具有动态特性的新型清单被创建出来,以便为每个个体患者提供更具体的清单项目。我们在这项基于模拟的研究中的目的是调查一种新开发的智能动态临床清单(DCC)在重症监护病房(ICU)查房中的应用。

方法

邀请合格的临床医生作为志愿者参与。为六个典型的 ICU 场景确定了最高可达分数,以确定必须检查哪些项目。参与者将 DCC 与当地的护理标准进行了比较。主要结果是护理人员满意度评分以及总体检查项目的百分比和需要直接干预的关键项目的百分比。

结果

共有 20 名参与者参与,共进行了 116 个场景。使用 DCC 检查的项目百分比中位数为 100.0%,而使用当地标准护理完成的场景中为 73.6%(P<0.001)。在使用当地标准护理完成的场景中,23.1%的关键项目未被检查,而在有 DCC 可用的场景中则为 0.0%(P<0.001)。DCC 的平均满意度评分为 5 分制的 4.13 分。

结论

这项模拟研究表明,智能 DCC 通过减少 ICU 查房期间未检查项目的百分比,显著提高了最佳实践的依从性,而用户满意度仍然很高。需要进行真实的临床研究来进一步评估这种新型清单。

相似文献

1
Intelligent dynamic clinical checklists improved checklist compliance in the intensive care unit.智能动态临床检查表提高了重症监护病房的检查表依从性。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):231-238. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex129.
2
Intelligent checklists improve checklist compliance in the intensive care unit: a prospective before-and-after mixed-method study.智能检查表可提高重症监护病房检查表的依从性:一项前瞻性前后混合方法研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;126(2):404-414. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.044. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
The effectiveness of an intensive care quick reference checklist manual--a randomized simulation-based trial.重症监护快速参考检查表手册的有效性——一项基于模拟的随机试验。
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
Developing content for a process-of-care checklist for use in intensive care units: a dual-method approach to establishing construct validity.制定用于重症监护病房的护理流程检查表的内容:建立结构有效性的双重方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 3;13:380. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-380.
5
The Effect of an Electronic Checklist on Critical Care Provider Workload, Errors, and Performance.电子检查表对重症护理人员工作量、差错及绩效的影响
J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;31(3):205-12. doi: 10.1177/0885066614558015. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
6
Checklists change communication about key elements of patient care.清单改变了对患者护理关键要素的沟通方式。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2 Suppl 1):S75-82. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182606239.
7
Perceptions of rounding checklists in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study.在重症监护病房中对查房核对清单的认知:一项定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):836-843. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007218. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Testing the implementation of an electronic process-of-care checklist for use during morning medical rounds in a tertiary intensive care unit: a prospective before-after study.在三级重症监护病房晨间查房期间使用电子护理流程清单的实施效果测试:一项前瞻性前后对照研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0060-1. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
9
Intensive care unit rounding checklist implementation. Effect of accountability measures on physician compliance.重症监护病房查房清单的实施。问责措施对医生依从性的影响。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Apr;12(4):533-8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201410-494OC.
10
A pilot study to test the use of a checklist in a tertiary intensive care unit as a method of ensuring quality processes of care.一项试点研究,旨在测试在三级重症监护病房使用检查表作为确保优质护理流程的一种方法。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006 Jun;34(3):322-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0603400222.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Data Science in Closing the Implementation Gap.数据科学在弥合实施差距中的作用。
Crit Care Clin. 2023 Oct;39(4):701-716. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
2
Transitioning Cognitive Aids into Decision Support Platforms: Requirements and Design Guidelines.将认知辅助工具转变为决策支持平台:要求与设计指南
ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2023 Jun;30(3). doi: 10.1145/3582431. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
3
A voice-based digital assistant for intelligent prompting of evidence-based practices during ICU rounds.
一种基于语音的数字助理,用于在 ICU 查房期间智能提示基于证据的实践。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Oct;146:104483. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104483. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
Medical physics practice guideline 4.b: Development, implementation, use and maintenance of safety checklists.医学物理实践指南 4.b:安全检查表的制定、实施、使用和维护。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Mar;24(3):e13895. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13895. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
5
Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHADS-VASc Scores.术前评估中的质量改进:计算 CHADS-VASc 评分的自动化临床决策支持系统的准确性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 13;58(9):1269. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091269.
6
[Implementation of a checklist improves adherence to evidence-based practices in a pediatric intensive therapy unit].[实施检查表可提高儿科重症监护病房对循证实践的依从性]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2022 Jun 6;79(2):116-122. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n2.34210.
7
Designing Interactive Alerts to Improve Recognition of Critical Events in Medical Emergencies.设计交互式警报以提高对医疗紧急情况中关键事件的识别能力。
DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2021 Jun;2021:864-878. doi: 10.1145/3461778.3462051. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
8
Cognitive biases in diagnosis and decision making during anaesthesia and intensive care.麻醉与重症监护期间诊断和决策中的认知偏差
BJA Educ. 2021 Nov;21(11):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Hemoptysis associated with percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy: Development of critical events checklist and procedure outcomes.经皮经胸针吸活检相关咯血:关键事件清单的制定及操作结果
J Radiol Nurs. 2021 Sep;40(3):221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 25.
10
Reducing medical device alarms by an order of magnitude: A human factors approach.将医疗器械报警减少一个数量级:一种人为因素方法。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2021 Jan;49(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20968840. Epub 2021 Feb 2.